在一项戒烟临床试验中,确定呼出一氧化碳和唾液可替宁的最佳截止值以识别韩裔美国人中的吸烟者。

IF 1.2 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2021-02-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/6678237
Sun S Kim, Seongho Kim, Philimon N Gona
{"title":"在一项戒烟临床试验中,确定呼出一氧化碳和唾液可替宁的最佳截止值以识别韩裔美国人中的吸烟者。","authors":"Sun S Kim,&nbsp;Seongho Kim,&nbsp;Philimon N Gona","doi":"10.1155/2021/6678237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is critical to accurately identify individuals who continue to smoke even after treatment, as this may prompt the use of more intensive and effective treatment strategies to help them attain complete abstinence.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study examined optimal cutoffs for exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and salivary cotinine to identify smokers among Korean Americans in a smoking cessation clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CO and cotinine were measured three to four times over 12 months from the quit day. Statistical analysis was conducted using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A CO cutoff of 5 parts per million provided robust sensitivity (80.8-98.3%) and perfect specificity (100%), and a salivary cotinine cutoff of level 2 (30-100 ng/ml) provided the best sensitivity (91.2-95.6%) and perfect specificity (100%). Using these cutoffs, the agreement between self-reports and the two biomarkers ranged from 88.6% to 97.7%. The areas under ROC curves (AUCs) of exhaled CO ranged from 0.90 to 0.99, all of which were significant (all <i>p</i> values < 0.001), and the AUCs of salivary cotinine ranged from 0.96 to 0.98 (all <i>p</i> values < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exhaled CO and salivary cotinine are complementary, and they should be used together to verify smoking abstinence for smokers in a clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":" ","pages":"6678237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279201/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining Optimal Cutoffs for Exhaled Carbon Monoxide and Salivary Cotinine to Identify Smokers among Korean Americans in a Smoking Cessation Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sun S Kim,&nbsp;Seongho Kim,&nbsp;Philimon N Gona\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/6678237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is critical to accurately identify individuals who continue to smoke even after treatment, as this may prompt the use of more intensive and effective treatment strategies to help them attain complete abstinence.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study examined optimal cutoffs for exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and salivary cotinine to identify smokers among Korean Americans in a smoking cessation clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CO and cotinine were measured three to four times over 12 months from the quit day. Statistical analysis was conducted using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A CO cutoff of 5 parts per million provided robust sensitivity (80.8-98.3%) and perfect specificity (100%), and a salivary cotinine cutoff of level 2 (30-100 ng/ml) provided the best sensitivity (91.2-95.6%) and perfect specificity (100%). Using these cutoffs, the agreement between self-reports and the two biomarkers ranged from 88.6% to 97.7%. The areas under ROC curves (AUCs) of exhaled CO ranged from 0.90 to 0.99, all of which were significant (all <i>p</i> values < 0.001), and the AUCs of salivary cotinine ranged from 0.96 to 0.98 (all <i>p</i> values < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exhaled CO and salivary cotinine are complementary, and they should be used together to verify smoking abstinence for smokers in a clinical trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6678237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279201/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6678237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6678237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

引言:准确识别治疗后仍继续吸烟的个体是至关重要的,因为这可能促使使用更密集和有效的治疗策略来帮助他们实现完全戒烟。目的:本研究考察了呼气一氧化碳(CO)和唾液可替宁的最佳临界值,以在戒烟临床试验中识别韩裔美国人中的吸烟者。方法:自戒烟日起12个月内测定CO和可替宁3 ~ 4次。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线进行统计学分析。结果:5 ppm的CO临界值灵敏度为80.8 ~ 98.3%,特异性为100%;2级的唾液可替宁临界值为30 ~ 100 ng/ml,灵敏度为91.2 ~ 95.6%,特异性为100%。使用这些截止点,自我报告和两种生物标志物之间的一致性在88.6%到97.7%之间。呼出CO的ROC曲线下面积(auc)在0.90 ~ 0.99之间,均有显著性差异(p值均< 0.001);唾液可替宁的auc在0.96 ~ 0.98之间,均有显著性差异(p值均< 0.001)。结论:呼出一氧化碳和唾液可替宁是互补的,在临床试验中应同时使用它们来验证吸烟者的戒烟效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Determining Optimal Cutoffs for Exhaled Carbon Monoxide and Salivary Cotinine to Identify Smokers among Korean Americans in a Smoking Cessation Clinical Trial.

Determining Optimal Cutoffs for Exhaled Carbon Monoxide and Salivary Cotinine to Identify Smokers among Korean Americans in a Smoking Cessation Clinical Trial.

Introduction: It is critical to accurately identify individuals who continue to smoke even after treatment, as this may prompt the use of more intensive and effective treatment strategies to help them attain complete abstinence.

Aims: This study examined optimal cutoffs for exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and salivary cotinine to identify smokers among Korean Americans in a smoking cessation clinical trial.

Methods: CO and cotinine were measured three to four times over 12 months from the quit day. Statistical analysis was conducted using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: A CO cutoff of 5 parts per million provided robust sensitivity (80.8-98.3%) and perfect specificity (100%), and a salivary cotinine cutoff of level 2 (30-100 ng/ml) provided the best sensitivity (91.2-95.6%) and perfect specificity (100%). Using these cutoffs, the agreement between self-reports and the two biomarkers ranged from 88.6% to 97.7%. The areas under ROC curves (AUCs) of exhaled CO ranged from 0.90 to 0.99, all of which were significant (all p values < 0.001), and the AUCs of salivary cotinine ranged from 0.96 to 0.98 (all p values < 0.001).

Conclusion: Exhaled CO and salivary cotinine are complementary, and they should be used together to verify smoking abstinence for smokers in a clinical trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信