比较一种草药泻药(Goleghand®)和聚乙二醇对儿童功能性便秘的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2021-05-13 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_20_133
Hosein Saneian, Saeedeh Ghaedi, Fatemeh Famouri, Majid Khademian, Najmeh Ahmadi, Mohammadreza Memarzadeh, Somayeh Sadeghi, Peiman Nasri
{"title":"比较一种草药泻药(Goleghand®)和聚乙二醇对儿童功能性便秘的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Hosein Saneian,&nbsp;Saeedeh Ghaedi,&nbsp;Fatemeh Famouri,&nbsp;Majid Khademian,&nbsp;Najmeh Ahmadi,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Memarzadeh,&nbsp;Somayeh Sadeghi,&nbsp;Peiman Nasri","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_20_133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and document the reported adverse effect of a herbal-based laxative (Goleghand<sup>®</sup>) for the maintenance treatment of functional constipation in young children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized clinical trial from April 2019 to September 2020. Children aged 2-15 years with functional constipation defined according to the Rome IV criteria were eligible for study inclusion. Eligible children were randomly allocated to receive polyethylene glycol (PEG) or Goleghand<sup>®</sup>. The number and consistency of stools per day, painful defecation, abdominal pain, and fecal incontinence were reported weekly by parents. The statistical analyses were performed by determining means and standard deviations, <i>t</i>-test, Chi-square test, ANOVA repeated measures, and Fisher's exact test, with significance, accepted at the 5% level.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Sixty patients have been enrolled in the study. Parental satisfaction scores did not change significantly in either group or over the follow-up period. Our results showed that the effect of time (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and also the effect of group type (<i>P</i> = 0.01) on the number of fecal defecations was significant. The mean number of defecations increased first and then decreased significantly over time, but this decrease was more significant in the PEG group than in the Goleghand<sup>®</sup> group (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Furthermore, the effect of time on the fecal consistency score was significant (<i>P</i> = 0.047). The mean score of fecal consistency in both groups decreased over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Goleghand<sup>®</sup> was similar in efficacy to PEG for 8 weeks of pediatric functional constipation treatment in this randomized clinical trial. Goleghand<sup>®</sup> can be considered as a new herbal laxative drug for pediatric functional constipation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"10 1","pages":"43-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9f/8e/JRPP-10-43.PMC8259596.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Effect of a Herbal-based Laxative (Goleghand®) and Polyethylene Glycol on Functional Constipation among Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hosein Saneian,&nbsp;Saeedeh Ghaedi,&nbsp;Fatemeh Famouri,&nbsp;Majid Khademian,&nbsp;Najmeh Ahmadi,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Memarzadeh,&nbsp;Somayeh Sadeghi,&nbsp;Peiman Nasri\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_20_133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and document the reported adverse effect of a herbal-based laxative (Goleghand<sup>®</sup>) for the maintenance treatment of functional constipation in young children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized clinical trial from April 2019 to September 2020. Children aged 2-15 years with functional constipation defined according to the Rome IV criteria were eligible for study inclusion. Eligible children were randomly allocated to receive polyethylene glycol (PEG) or Goleghand<sup>®</sup>. The number and consistency of stools per day, painful defecation, abdominal pain, and fecal incontinence were reported weekly by parents. The statistical analyses were performed by determining means and standard deviations, <i>t</i>-test, Chi-square test, ANOVA repeated measures, and Fisher's exact test, with significance, accepted at the 5% level.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Sixty patients have been enrolled in the study. Parental satisfaction scores did not change significantly in either group or over the follow-up period. Our results showed that the effect of time (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and also the effect of group type (<i>P</i> = 0.01) on the number of fecal defecations was significant. The mean number of defecations increased first and then decreased significantly over time, but this decrease was more significant in the PEG group than in the Goleghand<sup>®</sup> group (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Furthermore, the effect of time on the fecal consistency score was significant (<i>P</i> = 0.047). The mean score of fecal consistency in both groups decreased over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Goleghand<sup>®</sup> was similar in efficacy to PEG for 8 weeks of pediatric functional constipation treatment in this randomized clinical trial. Goleghand<sup>®</sup> can be considered as a new herbal laxative drug for pediatric functional constipation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"43-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9f/8e/JRPP-10-43.PMC8259596.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_20_133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_20_133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估一种草药泻药(Goleghand®)用于幼儿功能性便秘维持治疗的有效性、安全性,并记录其报道的不良反应。方法:于2019年4月至2020年9月进行随机临床试验。2-15岁的儿童,根据Rome IV标准定义功能性便秘,符合纳入研究的条件。符合条件的儿童随机分配接受聚乙二醇(PEG)或Goleghand®治疗。父母每周报告每天大便的数量和稠度、排便疼痛、腹痛和大便失禁。统计分析通过确定均数和标准差、t检验、卡方检验、方差分析重复测量和Fisher精确检验进行,显著性在5%水平上接受。研究结果:60名患者参加了这项研究。父母满意度得分在两组和随访期间都没有显著变化。结果显示,时间对排便次数的影响显著(P < 0.001),组型对排便次数的影响显著(P = 0.01)。随着时间的推移,平均排便次数先增加后显著减少,但PEG组的减少比Goleghand®组更显著(P = 0.001)。此外,时间对粪便一致性评分的影响有统计学意义(P = 0.047)。两组的粪便稠度平均评分均随时间下降。结论:在这项随机临床试验中,Goleghand®在8周儿童功能性便秘治疗中的疗效与PEG相似。Goleghand®是一种治疗小儿功能性便秘的新型草药泻药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparing the Effect of a Herbal-based Laxative (Goleghand®) and Polyethylene Glycol on Functional Constipation among Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Comparing the Effect of a Herbal-based Laxative (Goleghand®) and Polyethylene Glycol on Functional Constipation among Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Comparing the Effect of a Herbal-based Laxative (Goleghand®) and Polyethylene Glycol on Functional Constipation among Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Comparing the Effect of a Herbal-based Laxative (Goleghand®) and Polyethylene Glycol on Functional Constipation among Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and document the reported adverse effect of a herbal-based laxative (Goleghand®) for the maintenance treatment of functional constipation in young children.

Methods: We conducted a randomized clinical trial from April 2019 to September 2020. Children aged 2-15 years with functional constipation defined according to the Rome IV criteria were eligible for study inclusion. Eligible children were randomly allocated to receive polyethylene glycol (PEG) or Goleghand®. The number and consistency of stools per day, painful defecation, abdominal pain, and fecal incontinence were reported weekly by parents. The statistical analyses were performed by determining means and standard deviations, t-test, Chi-square test, ANOVA repeated measures, and Fisher's exact test, with significance, accepted at the 5% level.

Findings: Sixty patients have been enrolled in the study. Parental satisfaction scores did not change significantly in either group or over the follow-up period. Our results showed that the effect of time (P < 0.001) and also the effect of group type (P = 0.01) on the number of fecal defecations was significant. The mean number of defecations increased first and then decreased significantly over time, but this decrease was more significant in the PEG group than in the Goleghand® group (P = 0.001). Furthermore, the effect of time on the fecal consistency score was significant (P = 0.047). The mean score of fecal consistency in both groups decreased over time.

Conclusion: Goleghand® was similar in efficacy to PEG for 8 weeks of pediatric functional constipation treatment in this randomized clinical trial. Goleghand® can be considered as a new herbal laxative drug for pediatric functional constipation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信