文化适应性医疗保健教育干预:制定一项协议,对理论依据、内容、教学方法和有效性衡量标准进行系统性审查。

Margarita Echeverri, Aleda M H Chen
{"title":"文化适应性医疗保健教育干预:制定一项协议,对理论依据、内容、教学方法和有效性衡量标准进行系统性审查。","authors":"Margarita Echeverri, Aleda M H Chen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Educational programs in cultural competence have become an important strategy to prepare healthcare providers to better address the needs of an increasingly diverse society and to decrease health disparities. However, a literature review found little information on best practices in teaching cultural competence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create a protocol for conducting an effectiveness review of the literature to evaluate best practices in teaching methods, assessment, and interventions in cultural competence for health-related professions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol followed guidelines from the BEME (Best Evidence Medical Education) collaborative. Inclusion criteria, preliminary terms, and databases for searching were established. A modified version of the 6 QUESTS and the Kirkpatrick model were chosen to appraise and synthesize the information from studies included in the review. Finally, recommendations and the final report follow the adapted PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) checklist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policymakers, researchers, and teachers can use the evidence from a comprehensive systematic review to revise or develop educational interventions, assessment methods, and accreditation requirements for academic programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73614,"journal":{"name":"Journal of best practices in health professions diversity : research, education and policy","volume":"9 1","pages":"1160-1177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294596/pdf/nihms-1625713.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational Interventions for Culturally Competent Healthcare: Developing a Protocol to Conduct a Systematic Review of the Rationale, Content, Teaching Methods, and Measures of Effectiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Margarita Echeverri, Aleda M H Chen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Educational programs in cultural competence have become an important strategy to prepare healthcare providers to better address the needs of an increasingly diverse society and to decrease health disparities. However, a literature review found little information on best practices in teaching cultural competence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create a protocol for conducting an effectiveness review of the literature to evaluate best practices in teaching methods, assessment, and interventions in cultural competence for health-related professions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol followed guidelines from the BEME (Best Evidence Medical Education) collaborative. Inclusion criteria, preliminary terms, and databases for searching were established. A modified version of the 6 QUESTS and the Kirkpatrick model were chosen to appraise and synthesize the information from studies included in the review. Finally, recommendations and the final report follow the adapted PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) checklist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policymakers, researchers, and teachers can use the evidence from a comprehensive systematic review to revise or develop educational interventions, assessment methods, and accreditation requirements for academic programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of best practices in health professions diversity : research, education and policy\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1160-1177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8294596/pdf/nihms-1625713.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of best practices in health professions diversity : research, education and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of best practices in health professions diversity : research, education and policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文化胜任力教育计划已成为一项重要战略,旨在培养医疗服务提供者更好地满足日益多元化的社会需求,并减少健康差异。然而,一项文献综述发现,有关文化素养教学最佳实践的信息很少:目的:制定一个对文献进行有效性审查的方案,以评估健康相关专业文化能力的教学方法、评估和干预的最佳实践:方法:该方案遵循 BEME(最佳证据医学教育)合作组织的指导方针。制定了纳入标准、初步术语和检索数据库。选择了 6 个问题的修订版和 Kirkpatrick 模型来评估和综合纳入综述的研究信息。最后,建议和最终报告遵循了经过改编的 PRISMA(系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目)清单:政策制定者、研究人员和教师可以利用全面系统综述中的证据来修订或制定教育干预措施、评估方法和学术项目的认证要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educational Interventions for Culturally Competent Healthcare: Developing a Protocol to Conduct a Systematic Review of the Rationale, Content, Teaching Methods, and Measures of Effectiveness.

Educational programs in cultural competence have become an important strategy to prepare healthcare providers to better address the needs of an increasingly diverse society and to decrease health disparities. However, a literature review found little information on best practices in teaching cultural competence.

Objective: To create a protocol for conducting an effectiveness review of the literature to evaluate best practices in teaching methods, assessment, and interventions in cultural competence for health-related professions.

Methods: The protocol followed guidelines from the BEME (Best Evidence Medical Education) collaborative. Inclusion criteria, preliminary terms, and databases for searching were established. A modified version of the 6 QUESTS and the Kirkpatrick model were chosen to appraise and synthesize the information from studies included in the review. Finally, recommendations and the final report follow the adapted PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) checklist.

Conclusions: Policymakers, researchers, and teachers can use the evidence from a comprehensive systematic review to revise or develop educational interventions, assessment methods, and accreditation requirements for academic programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信