准直器在铅笔束扫描质子治疗中的应用与创新。

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Particle Therapy Pub Date : 2021-06-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.14338/IJPT-20-00039.1
Daniel E Hyer, Laura C Bennett, Theodore J Geoghegan, Martin Bues, Blake R Smith
{"title":"准直器在铅笔束扫描质子治疗中的应用与创新。","authors":"Daniel E Hyer,&nbsp;Laura C Bennett,&nbsp;Theodore J Geoghegan,&nbsp;Martin Bues,&nbsp;Blake R Smith","doi":"10.14338/IJPT-20-00039.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The development of collimating technologies has become a recent focus in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy to improve the target conformity and healthy tissue sparing through field-specific or energy-layer-specific collimation. Given the growing popularity of collimators for low-energy treatments, the purpose of this work was to summarize the recent literature that has focused on the efficacy of collimators for PBS and highlight the development of clinical and preclinical collimators.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The collimators presented in this work were organized into 3 categories: per-field apertures, multileaf collimators (MLCs), and sliding-bar collimators. For each case, the system design and planning methodologies are summarized and intercompared from their existing literature. Energy-specific collimation is still a new paradigm in PBS and the 2 specific collimators tailored toward PBS are presented including the dynamic collimation system (DCS) and the Mevion Adaptive Aperture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collimation during PBS can improve the target conformity and associated healthy tissue and critical structure avoidance. Between energy-specific collimators and static apertures, static apertures have the poorest dose conformity owing to collimating only the largest projection of a target in the beam's eye view but still provide an improvement over uncollimated treatments. While an external collimator increases secondary neutron production, the benefit of collimating the primary beam appears to outweigh the risk. The greatest benefit has been observed for low- energy treatment sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The consensus from current literature supports the use of external collimators in PBS under certain conditions, namely low-energy treatments or where the nominal spot size is large. While many recent studies paint a supportive picture, it is also important to understand the limitations of collimation in PBS that are specific to each collimator type. The emergence and paradigm of energy-specific collimation holds many promises for PBS proton therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":36923,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"73-83"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270095/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovations and the Use of Collimators in the Delivery of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel E Hyer,&nbsp;Laura C Bennett,&nbsp;Theodore J Geoghegan,&nbsp;Martin Bues,&nbsp;Blake R Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.14338/IJPT-20-00039.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The development of collimating technologies has become a recent focus in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy to improve the target conformity and healthy tissue sparing through field-specific or energy-layer-specific collimation. Given the growing popularity of collimators for low-energy treatments, the purpose of this work was to summarize the recent literature that has focused on the efficacy of collimators for PBS and highlight the development of clinical and preclinical collimators.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The collimators presented in this work were organized into 3 categories: per-field apertures, multileaf collimators (MLCs), and sliding-bar collimators. For each case, the system design and planning methodologies are summarized and intercompared from their existing literature. Energy-specific collimation is still a new paradigm in PBS and the 2 specific collimators tailored toward PBS are presented including the dynamic collimation system (DCS) and the Mevion Adaptive Aperture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collimation during PBS can improve the target conformity and associated healthy tissue and critical structure avoidance. Between energy-specific collimators and static apertures, static apertures have the poorest dose conformity owing to collimating only the largest projection of a target in the beam's eye view but still provide an improvement over uncollimated treatments. While an external collimator increases secondary neutron production, the benefit of collimating the primary beam appears to outweigh the risk. The greatest benefit has been observed for low- energy treatment sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The consensus from current literature supports the use of external collimators in PBS under certain conditions, namely low-energy treatments or where the nominal spot size is large. While many recent studies paint a supportive picture, it is also important to understand the limitations of collimation in PBS that are specific to each collimator type. The emergence and paradigm of energy-specific collimation holds many promises for PBS proton therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Particle Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"73-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8270095/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Particle Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-20-00039.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-20-00039.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:在铅笔束扫描(PBS)质子治疗中,准直技术的发展已成为近年来关注的焦点,通过场特异性或能量层特异性准直来提高靶的一致性和健康组织的保护。鉴于准直器用于低能治疗的日益普及,本工作的目的是总结最近关于准直器用于PBS疗效的文献,并强调临床和临床前准直器的发展。材料和方法:本文提出的准直器分为三大类:逐场孔径准直器、多叶准直器和滑动杆准直器。对于每个案例,系统设计和规划方法进行了总结,并从现有文献中进行了相互比较。能量专用准直在PBS中仍然是一种新的准直模式,本文介绍了两种针对PBS的专用准直器,包括动态准直系统(DCS)和Mevion自适应光圈。结果:PBS过程中的准直可提高靶的符合性和相关的健康组织和关键结构的回避。在能量专用准直器和静态孔径之间,静态孔径的剂量一致性最差,因为它只准直了光束视野中目标的最大投影,但仍然比未准直的处理提供了改进。虽然外部准直器增加了二次中子的产生,但准直主光束的好处似乎大于风险。在低能处理地点观察到最大的效益。结论:目前文献一致支持在一定条件下,即低能量治疗或标称光斑尺寸较大的情况下,在PBS中使用外准直器。虽然许多最近的研究描绘了一幅支持性的画面,但了解每种准直器类型特定的PBS准直限制也很重要。能量特异性准直的出现和范式为PBS质子治疗带来了许多希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Innovations and the Use of Collimators in the Delivery of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.

Innovations and the Use of Collimators in the Delivery of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.

Innovations and the Use of Collimators in the Delivery of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.

Innovations and the Use of Collimators in the Delivery of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.

Purpose: The development of collimating technologies has become a recent focus in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy to improve the target conformity and healthy tissue sparing through field-specific or energy-layer-specific collimation. Given the growing popularity of collimators for low-energy treatments, the purpose of this work was to summarize the recent literature that has focused on the efficacy of collimators for PBS and highlight the development of clinical and preclinical collimators.

Materials and methods: The collimators presented in this work were organized into 3 categories: per-field apertures, multileaf collimators (MLCs), and sliding-bar collimators. For each case, the system design and planning methodologies are summarized and intercompared from their existing literature. Energy-specific collimation is still a new paradigm in PBS and the 2 specific collimators tailored toward PBS are presented including the dynamic collimation system (DCS) and the Mevion Adaptive Aperture.

Results: Collimation during PBS can improve the target conformity and associated healthy tissue and critical structure avoidance. Between energy-specific collimators and static apertures, static apertures have the poorest dose conformity owing to collimating only the largest projection of a target in the beam's eye view but still provide an improvement over uncollimated treatments. While an external collimator increases secondary neutron production, the benefit of collimating the primary beam appears to outweigh the risk. The greatest benefit has been observed for low- energy treatment sites.

Conclusion: The consensus from current literature supports the use of external collimators in PBS under certain conditions, namely low-energy treatments or where the nominal spot size is large. While many recent studies paint a supportive picture, it is also important to understand the limitations of collimation in PBS that are specific to each collimator type. The emergence and paradigm of energy-specific collimation holds many promises for PBS proton therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Particle Therapy
International Journal of Particle Therapy Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
23
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信