Jennifer K Burton, Patricia Fearon, Anna H Noel-Storr, Rupert McShane, David J Stott, Terry J Quinn
{"title":"老年人认知能力下降问卷(IQCODE)用于在全科(初级保健)环境中检测痴呆症。","authors":"Jennifer K Burton, Patricia Fearon, Anna H Noel-Storr, Rupert McShane, David J Stott, Terry J Quinn","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD010771.pub3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The IQCODE (Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly) is a commonly used questionnaire based tool that uses collateral information to assess for cognitive decline and dementia. Brief tools that can be used for dementia \"screening\" or \"triage\" may have particular utility in primary care / general practice healthcare settings but only if they have suitable test accuracy. A synthesis of the available data regarding IQCODE accuracy in a primary care setting should help inform cognitive assessment strategies for clinical practice; research and policy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the accuracy of the informant-based questionnaire IQCODE, for detection of dementia in a primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>A search was performed in the following sources on the 28th of January 2013: ALOIS (Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group), MEDLINE (Ovid SP), EMBASE (Ovid SP), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), BIOSIS (Ovid SP), ISI Web of Science and Conference Proceedings (ISI Web of Knowledge), CINHAL (EBSCOhost) and LILACs (BIREME). We also searched sources specific to diagnostic test accuracy: MEDION (Universities of Maastricht and Leuven); DARE (York University); HTA Database (Health Technology Assessments Database via The Cochrane Library) and ARIF (Birmingham University). We developed a sensitive search strategy; search terms were designed to cover key concepts using several different approaches run in parallel and included terms relating to cognitive tests, cognitive screening and dementia. We used standardized database subject headings such as MeSH terms (in MEDLINE) and other standardized headings (controlled vocabulary) in other databases, as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We selected those studies performed in primary care settings, which included (not necessarily exclusively) IQCODE to assess for the presence of dementia and where dementia diagnosis was confirmed with clinical assessment. For the \"primary care\" setting, we included those healthcare settings where unselected patients, present for initial, non-specialist assessment of memory or non-memory related symptoms; often with a view to onward referral for more definitive assessment.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We screened all titles generated by electronic database searches and abstracts of all potentially relevant studies were reviewed. Full papers were assessed for eligibility and data extracted by two independent assessors. Quality assessment (risk of bias and applicability) was determined using the QUADAS-2 tool. Reporting quality was determined using the STARDdem extension to the STARD tool.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>From 71 papers describing IQCODE test accuracy, we included 1 paper, representing data from 230 individuals (n=16 [7%] with dementia). The paper described those patients consulting a primary care service who self-identified as Japanese-American. Dementia diagnosis was made using Benson & Cummings criteria and the IQCODE was recorded as part of a longer interview with the informant. IQCODE accuracy was assessed at various test thresholds, with a \"trade-off\" between sensitivity and specificity across these cutpoints. At an IQCODE threshold of 3.2 sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 76%; for IQCODE 3.7 sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 98%. Applying the QUADAS-2 assessments, the study was at high risk of bias in all categories. In particular degree of blinding was unclear and not all participants were included in the final analysis.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>It is not possible to give definitive guidance on the test accuracy of IQCODE for the diagnosis of dementia in a primary care setting based on the single study identified. We are surprised by the lack of research using the IQCODE in primary care as this is, arguably, the most appropriate setting for targeted case finding of those with undiagnosed dementia in order to maximise opportunities to intervene and provide support for the individual and their carers.</p>","PeriodicalId":515753,"journal":{"name":"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews","volume":" ","pages":"CD010771"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/14651858.CD010771.pub3","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) for the detection of dementia within a general practice (primary care) setting.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer K Burton, Patricia Fearon, Anna H Noel-Storr, Rupert McShane, David J Stott, Terry J Quinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/14651858.CD010771.pub3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The IQCODE (Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly) is a commonly used questionnaire based tool that uses collateral information to assess for cognitive decline and dementia. Brief tools that can be used for dementia \\\"screening\\\" or \\\"triage\\\" may have particular utility in primary care / general practice healthcare settings but only if they have suitable test accuracy. A synthesis of the available data regarding IQCODE accuracy in a primary care setting should help inform cognitive assessment strategies for clinical practice; research and policy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the accuracy of the informant-based questionnaire IQCODE, for detection of dementia in a primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>A search was performed in the following sources on the 28th of January 2013: ALOIS (Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group), MEDLINE (Ovid SP), EMBASE (Ovid SP), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), BIOSIS (Ovid SP), ISI Web of Science and Conference Proceedings (ISI Web of Knowledge), CINHAL (EBSCOhost) and LILACs (BIREME). We also searched sources specific to diagnostic test accuracy: MEDION (Universities of Maastricht and Leuven); DARE (York University); HTA Database (Health Technology Assessments Database via The Cochrane Library) and ARIF (Birmingham University). We developed a sensitive search strategy; search terms were designed to cover key concepts using several different approaches run in parallel and included terms relating to cognitive tests, cognitive screening and dementia. We used standardized database subject headings such as MeSH terms (in MEDLINE) and other standardized headings (controlled vocabulary) in other databases, as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We selected those studies performed in primary care settings, which included (not necessarily exclusively) IQCODE to assess for the presence of dementia and where dementia diagnosis was confirmed with clinical assessment. For the \\\"primary care\\\" setting, we included those healthcare settings where unselected patients, present for initial, non-specialist assessment of memory or non-memory related symptoms; often with a view to onward referral for more definitive assessment.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We screened all titles generated by electronic database searches and abstracts of all potentially relevant studies were reviewed. Full papers were assessed for eligibility and data extracted by two independent assessors. Quality assessment (risk of bias and applicability) was determined using the QUADAS-2 tool. Reporting quality was determined using the STARDdem extension to the STARD tool.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>From 71 papers describing IQCODE test accuracy, we included 1 paper, representing data from 230 individuals (n=16 [7%] with dementia). The paper described those patients consulting a primary care service who self-identified as Japanese-American. Dementia diagnosis was made using Benson & Cummings criteria and the IQCODE was recorded as part of a longer interview with the informant. IQCODE accuracy was assessed at various test thresholds, with a \\\"trade-off\\\" between sensitivity and specificity across these cutpoints. At an IQCODE threshold of 3.2 sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 76%; for IQCODE 3.7 sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 98%. Applying the QUADAS-2 assessments, the study was at high risk of bias in all categories. In particular degree of blinding was unclear and not all participants were included in the final analysis.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>It is not possible to give definitive guidance on the test accuracy of IQCODE for the diagnosis of dementia in a primary care setting based on the single study identified. We are surprised by the lack of research using the IQCODE in primary care as this is, arguably, the most appropriate setting for targeted case finding of those with undiagnosed dementia in order to maximise opportunities to intervene and provide support for the individual and their carers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":515753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"CD010771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/14651858.CD010771.pub3\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010771.pub3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010771.pub3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
背景:IQCODE(老年人认知能力下降问卷)是一种常用的基于问卷的工具,它使用附带信息来评估认知能力下降和痴呆。可用于痴呆症“筛查”或“分诊”的简短工具可能在初级保健/全科医疗保健环境中具有特殊效用,但前提是它们具有适当的测试准确性。关于初级保健环境中IQCODE准确性的现有数据的综合应有助于告知临床实践的认知评估策略;研究和政策。目的:确定基于信息者的问卷IQCODE在初级保健机构中检测痴呆的准确性。检索方法:于2013年1月28日在以下来源进行检索:ALOIS (Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group)、MEDLINE (Ovid SP)、EMBASE (Ovid SP)、PsycINFO (Ovid SP)、BIOSIS (Ovid SP)、ISI Web of Science and Conference Proceedings (ISI Web of Knowledge)、CINHAL (EBSCOhost)和LILACs (BIREME)。我们还搜索了诊断测试准确性的特定来源:MEDION(马斯特里赫特大学和鲁汶大学);DARE(约克大学);HTA数据库(通过Cochrane图书馆的健康技术评估数据库)和ARIF(伯明翰大学)。我们制定了一个敏感的搜索策略;搜索词被设计成使用几种并行运行的不同方法来涵盖关键概念,包括与认知测试、认知筛查和痴呆症有关的术语。我们使用标准化的数据库主题标题,如MeSH术语(在MEDLINE中)和其他数据库中的其他标准化标题(受控词汇表),视情况而定。选择标准:我们选择了那些在初级保健机构进行的研究,其中包括(不一定是唯一的)IQCODE来评估痴呆的存在,以及痴呆诊断通过临床评估得到证实。对于“初级保健”设置,我们纳入了那些未选择的患者,对记忆或非记忆相关症状进行初始,非专业评估的医疗保健设置;通常是为了进一步转介进行更明确的评估。数据收集和分析:我们筛选了电子数据库检索产生的所有标题,并审查了所有可能相关的研究摘要。论文全文的合格性和数据提取由两名独立评估员进行评估。使用QUADAS-2工具确定质量评估(偏倚风险和适用性)。报告质量是通过使用STARD工具的扩展来确定的。主要结果:从71篇描述IQCODE测试准确性的论文中,我们纳入了1篇论文,代表了230名痴呆症患者(n=16[7%])的数据。这篇论文描述了那些自我认定为日裔美国人的初级保健服务咨询患者。痴呆诊断采用Benson & Cummings标准,IQCODE被记录为与被试者的长时间访谈的一部分。在不同的测试阈值下评估IQCODE的准确性,并在这些切点上的敏感性和特异性之间进行“权衡”。IQCODE阈值为3.2时,灵敏度为100%,特异性为76%;对于IQCODE 3.7,灵敏度为75%,特异性为98%。应用QUADAS-2评估,该研究在所有类别中均存在高偏倚风险。特别是,盲法的程度尚不清楚,并非所有参与者都被纳入最终分析。作者的结论是:基于所确定的单一研究,不可能对IQCODE在初级保健环境中诊断痴呆的测试准确性给出明确的指导。我们对缺乏在初级保健中使用IQCODE的研究感到惊讶,因为这可以说是针对未确诊痴呆症患者的目标病例发现的最合适的设置,以便最大限度地进行干预并为个人及其护理人员提供支持。
Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) for the detection of dementia within a general practice (primary care) setting.
Background: The IQCODE (Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly) is a commonly used questionnaire based tool that uses collateral information to assess for cognitive decline and dementia. Brief tools that can be used for dementia "screening" or "triage" may have particular utility in primary care / general practice healthcare settings but only if they have suitable test accuracy. A synthesis of the available data regarding IQCODE accuracy in a primary care setting should help inform cognitive assessment strategies for clinical practice; research and policy.
Objectives: To determine the accuracy of the informant-based questionnaire IQCODE, for detection of dementia in a primary care setting.
Search methods: A search was performed in the following sources on the 28th of January 2013: ALOIS (Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group), MEDLINE (Ovid SP), EMBASE (Ovid SP), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), BIOSIS (Ovid SP), ISI Web of Science and Conference Proceedings (ISI Web of Knowledge), CINHAL (EBSCOhost) and LILACs (BIREME). We also searched sources specific to diagnostic test accuracy: MEDION (Universities of Maastricht and Leuven); DARE (York University); HTA Database (Health Technology Assessments Database via The Cochrane Library) and ARIF (Birmingham University). We developed a sensitive search strategy; search terms were designed to cover key concepts using several different approaches run in parallel and included terms relating to cognitive tests, cognitive screening and dementia. We used standardized database subject headings such as MeSH terms (in MEDLINE) and other standardized headings (controlled vocabulary) in other databases, as appropriate.
Selection criteria: We selected those studies performed in primary care settings, which included (not necessarily exclusively) IQCODE to assess for the presence of dementia and where dementia diagnosis was confirmed with clinical assessment. For the "primary care" setting, we included those healthcare settings where unselected patients, present for initial, non-specialist assessment of memory or non-memory related symptoms; often with a view to onward referral for more definitive assessment.
Data collection and analysis: We screened all titles generated by electronic database searches and abstracts of all potentially relevant studies were reviewed. Full papers were assessed for eligibility and data extracted by two independent assessors. Quality assessment (risk of bias and applicability) was determined using the QUADAS-2 tool. Reporting quality was determined using the STARDdem extension to the STARD tool.
Main results: From 71 papers describing IQCODE test accuracy, we included 1 paper, representing data from 230 individuals (n=16 [7%] with dementia). The paper described those patients consulting a primary care service who self-identified as Japanese-American. Dementia diagnosis was made using Benson & Cummings criteria and the IQCODE was recorded as part of a longer interview with the informant. IQCODE accuracy was assessed at various test thresholds, with a "trade-off" between sensitivity and specificity across these cutpoints. At an IQCODE threshold of 3.2 sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 76%; for IQCODE 3.7 sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 98%. Applying the QUADAS-2 assessments, the study was at high risk of bias in all categories. In particular degree of blinding was unclear and not all participants were included in the final analysis.
Authors' conclusions: It is not possible to give definitive guidance on the test accuracy of IQCODE for the diagnosis of dementia in a primary care setting based on the single study identified. We are surprised by the lack of research using the IQCODE in primary care as this is, arguably, the most appropriate setting for targeted case finding of those with undiagnosed dementia in order to maximise opportunities to intervene and provide support for the individual and their carers.