贝尔法斯特女王大学毕业生在核心和专业应用方面的表现。

Q3 Medicine
Ulster Medical Journal Pub Date : 2021-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-08
Joshua McKenna, Jeremy Chan, Alexander P Maxwell
{"title":"贝尔法斯特女王大学毕业生在核心和专业应用方面的表现。","authors":"Joshua McKenna,&nbsp;Jeremy Chan,&nbsp;Alexander P Maxwell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The general medical council (GMC) conducts the National Training Survey (NTS) annually. Part of the survey illustrates the statistics of United Kingdom medical school graduates in core and speciality application. We aimed to review the speciality training application and performance of graduates of Queen's University Belfast (QUB), and compared with graduates of medical schools in England, Scotland, and Wales.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The progression reports from the GMC NTS 2016-2019 were accessed on the GMC website. All data available were extracted in April 2020. The mean results for all graduates of 33 UK medical schools in Northern Ireland, England, Scotland, and Wales were collated from the NTS. Applications to the seven specialities with the greatest number of posts available across the UK were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were noted in the majority of the application stages when comparing graduates from QUB with other UK medical school graduates. However, QUB graduates were less likely to be invited for an interview when applying for core surgical training AND receive an offer for Core Anaesthetic and ACCS Training. QUB graduates were less likely to apply for General Practice training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study evaluates the performance of QUB graduates compared to other UK medical graduates in core/speciality application. Based on our findings, QUB and postgraduate deaneries may consider focussing on strengthening applications for aspiring surgeons, improving interview performance for anaesthetics and ACCS applicants, and attracting trainees to pursue a career in General Practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":38815,"journal":{"name":"Ulster Medical Journal","volume":"90 2","pages":"101-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/aa/3c/umj-90-02-101.PMC8278950.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Queen's University Belfast graduates at core and speciality application.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua McKenna,&nbsp;Jeremy Chan,&nbsp;Alexander P Maxwell\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The general medical council (GMC) conducts the National Training Survey (NTS) annually. Part of the survey illustrates the statistics of United Kingdom medical school graduates in core and speciality application. We aimed to review the speciality training application and performance of graduates of Queen's University Belfast (QUB), and compared with graduates of medical schools in England, Scotland, and Wales.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The progression reports from the GMC NTS 2016-2019 were accessed on the GMC website. All data available were extracted in April 2020. The mean results for all graduates of 33 UK medical schools in Northern Ireland, England, Scotland, and Wales were collated from the NTS. Applications to the seven specialities with the greatest number of posts available across the UK were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were noted in the majority of the application stages when comparing graduates from QUB with other UK medical school graduates. However, QUB graduates were less likely to be invited for an interview when applying for core surgical training AND receive an offer for Core Anaesthetic and ACCS Training. QUB graduates were less likely to apply for General Practice training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study evaluates the performance of QUB graduates compared to other UK medical graduates in core/speciality application. Based on our findings, QUB and postgraduate deaneries may consider focussing on strengthening applications for aspiring surgeons, improving interview performance for anaesthetics and ACCS applicants, and attracting trainees to pursue a career in General Practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulster Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"90 2\",\"pages\":\"101-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/aa/3c/umj-90-02-101.PMC8278950.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulster Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulster Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:英国医学总会(GMC)每年进行一次全国培训调查(NTS)。调查的一部分说明了英国医学院毕业生在核心和专业应用方面的统计数据。我们的目的是回顾贝尔法斯特女王大学(QUB)毕业生的专业培训申请和表现,并与英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士医学院的毕业生进行比较。方法:在GMC网站上查阅GMC NTS 2016-2019的进展报告。所有可用数据均于2020年4月提取。来自北爱尔兰、英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士的33所英国医学院的所有毕业生的平均结果都是从NTS中整理出来的。我们分析了英国七个职位数量最多的专业的申请情况。结果:昆士兰昆士兰大学的毕业生与其他英国医学院的毕业生相比,在大多数申请阶段没有差异。然而,昆士兰大学毕业生在申请核心外科培训和获得核心麻醉和ACCS培训的机会时,被邀请参加面试的可能性较小。昆士兰大学毕业生不太可能申请全科医生培训。结论:我们的研究评估了昆士兰大学毕业生与其他英国医学毕业生在核心/专业应用方面的表现。根据我们的研究结果,昆士兰大学和研究生学院可以考虑加强对有抱负的外科医生的申请,提高麻醉学和ACCS申请人的面试表现,并吸引实习生从事全科医生的职业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of Queen's University Belfast graduates at core and speciality application.

Introduction: The general medical council (GMC) conducts the National Training Survey (NTS) annually. Part of the survey illustrates the statistics of United Kingdom medical school graduates in core and speciality application. We aimed to review the speciality training application and performance of graduates of Queen's University Belfast (QUB), and compared with graduates of medical schools in England, Scotland, and Wales.

Method: The progression reports from the GMC NTS 2016-2019 were accessed on the GMC website. All data available were extracted in April 2020. The mean results for all graduates of 33 UK medical schools in Northern Ireland, England, Scotland, and Wales were collated from the NTS. Applications to the seven specialities with the greatest number of posts available across the UK were analysed.

Results: No differences were noted in the majority of the application stages when comparing graduates from QUB with other UK medical school graduates. However, QUB graduates were less likely to be invited for an interview when applying for core surgical training AND receive an offer for Core Anaesthetic and ACCS Training. QUB graduates were less likely to apply for General Practice training.

Conclusion: Our study evaluates the performance of QUB graduates compared to other UK medical graduates in core/speciality application. Based on our findings, QUB and postgraduate deaneries may consider focussing on strengthening applications for aspiring surgeons, improving interview performance for anaesthetics and ACCS applicants, and attracting trainees to pursue a career in General Practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ulster Medical Journal
Ulster Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信