André Azul Freitas , Rui Baptista , Valdirene Gonçalves , Cátia Ferreira , James Milner , Carolina Lourenço , Susana Costa , Fátima Franco , Sílvia Monteiro , Francisco Gonçalves , Lino Gonçalves
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2大流行对葡萄牙初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心st段抬高型心肌梗死入院率和结局的影响:初步数据","authors":"André Azul Freitas , Rui Baptista , Valdirene Gonçalves , Cátia Ferreira , James Milner , Carolina Lourenço , Susana Costa , Fátima Franco , Sílvia Monteiro , Francisco Gonçalves , Lino Gonçalves","doi":"10.1016/j.repce.2021.07.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has led to significant changes in healthcare systems and its impact on the treatment of cardiovascular conditions, such as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), is unknown in countries where the healthcare systems were not saturated, as was the case in Portugal. As such, we aimed to assess the effect on STEMI admissions and outcomes in Portuguese centers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a single-center, observational, retrospective study including all patients admitted to our hospital due to STEMI between the date of the first SARS-CoV-2 case diagnosed in Portugal and the end of the state of emergency (March and April 2020). Patient characteristics and outcomes were assessed and compared with the same period of 2019.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 104 STEMI patients were assessed, 55 in 2019 and 49 in 2020 (-11%). There were no significant differences between groups regarding age (62±12 vs. 65±14 years, p=0.308), gender (84.8% vs. 77.6% males, p=0.295) or comorbidities. In the 2020 group, there was a significant decrease in the proportion of patients transported to the hospital in pre-hospital emergency medical transportation (38.2% vs. 20.4%, p=0.038), an increase in system delay (49 [30-110.25] vs. 140 [90-180] minutes, p=0.019), a higher Killip-Kimball class, with a decrease in class I (74.5% vs. 51%) and an increase in class III (1.8% vs. 8.2%) and IV (5.5% vs. 18.4%) (p=0.038), a greater incidence of vasoactive support (3.7% vs. 26.5%, p=0.001), invasive mechanic ventilation usage (3.6% vs. 14.3%, p=0.056), and an increase in severe left ventricular dysfunction at hospital discharge (3.6% vs. 16.3%, p=0.03). In-hospital mortality was 14.3% in the 2020 group and 7.3% in the 2019 group p=0.200).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite a lack of significant variation in the absolute number of STEMI admissions, there was an increase in STEMI clinical severity and significantly worse outcomes during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. An increase in system delay, impaired pre-hospital care and patient fear of in-hospital infection can partially justify these results and should be the target of future actions in further waves of the pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101121,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition)","volume":"40 7","pages":"Pages 465-471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.repce.2021.07.014","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on ST-elevation myocardial infarction admissions and outcomes in a Portuguese primary percutaneous coronary intervention center: Preliminary Data\",\"authors\":\"André Azul Freitas , Rui Baptista , Valdirene Gonçalves , Cátia Ferreira , James Milner , Carolina Lourenço , Susana Costa , Fátima Franco , Sílvia Monteiro , Francisco Gonçalves , Lino Gonçalves\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.repce.2021.07.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has led to significant changes in healthcare systems and its impact on the treatment of cardiovascular conditions, such as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), is unknown in countries where the healthcare systems were not saturated, as was the case in Portugal. As such, we aimed to assess the effect on STEMI admissions and outcomes in Portuguese centers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a single-center, observational, retrospective study including all patients admitted to our hospital due to STEMI between the date of the first SARS-CoV-2 case diagnosed in Portugal and the end of the state of emergency (March and April 2020). Patient characteristics and outcomes were assessed and compared with the same period of 2019.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 104 STEMI patients were assessed, 55 in 2019 and 49 in 2020 (-11%). There were no significant differences between groups regarding age (62±12 vs. 65±14 years, p=0.308), gender (84.8% vs. 77.6% males, p=0.295) or comorbidities. In the 2020 group, there was a significant decrease in the proportion of patients transported to the hospital in pre-hospital emergency medical transportation (38.2% vs. 20.4%, p=0.038), an increase in system delay (49 [30-110.25] vs. 140 [90-180] minutes, p=0.019), a higher Killip-Kimball class, with a decrease in class I (74.5% vs. 51%) and an increase in class III (1.8% vs. 8.2%) and IV (5.5% vs. 18.4%) (p=0.038), a greater incidence of vasoactive support (3.7% vs. 26.5%, p=0.001), invasive mechanic ventilation usage (3.6% vs. 14.3%, p=0.056), and an increase in severe left ventricular dysfunction at hospital discharge (3.6% vs. 16.3%, p=0.03). In-hospital mortality was 14.3% in the 2020 group and 7.3% in the 2019 group p=0.200).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite a lack of significant variation in the absolute number of STEMI admissions, there was an increase in STEMI clinical severity and significantly worse outcomes during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. An increase in system delay, impaired pre-hospital care and patient fear of in-hospital infection can partially justify these results and should be the target of future actions in further waves of the pandemic.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"40 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 465-471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.repce.2021.07.014\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2174204921001835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2174204921001835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
冠状病毒病(COVID-19)导致卫生保健系统发生重大变化,其对st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)等心血管疾病治疗的影响,在卫生保健系统不饱和的国家(如葡萄牙)尚不清楚。因此,我们的目的是评估对葡萄牙语中心STEMI入学和结果的影响。方法我们开展了一项单中心、观察性、回顾性研究,纳入了在葡萄牙确诊首例SARS-CoV-2病例之日至紧急状态结束(2020年3月至4月)期间因STEMI入院的所有患者。评估患者特征和结果,并与2019年同期进行比较。结果共评估了104例STEMI患者,2019年55例,2020年49例(-11%)。在年龄(62±12岁vs. 65±14岁,p=0.308)、性别(男性84.8% vs. 77.6%, p=0.295)和合共病方面,两组间无显著差异。在2020组中,院前紧急医疗转运患者送往医院的比例显著下降(38.2%比20.4%,p=0.038),系统延迟增加(49[30-110.25]比140[90-180]分钟,p=0.019), Killip-Kimball分级更高,其中I级降低(74.5%比51%),III级增加(1.8%比8.2%)和IV级增加(5.5%比18.4%)(p=0.038),血管活性支持发生率更高(3.7%比26.5%,p=0.001)。有创机械通气的使用(3.6%对14.3%,p=0.056),出院时严重左心室功能障碍的增加(3.6%对16.3%,p=0.03)。2020年组住院死亡率为14.3%,2019年组为7.3% (p=0.200)。结论:尽管STEMI入院的绝对数量没有显著变化,但在SARS-CoV-2大流行期间,STEMI的临床严重程度有所增加,预后明显较差。系统延迟的增加、院前护理的受损和患者对院内感染的恐惧可以部分证明这些结果是合理的,并应成为未来大流行浪潮中采取行动的目标。
Impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on ST-elevation myocardial infarction admissions and outcomes in a Portuguese primary percutaneous coronary intervention center: Preliminary Data
Introduction
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has led to significant changes in healthcare systems and its impact on the treatment of cardiovascular conditions, such as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), is unknown in countries where the healthcare systems were not saturated, as was the case in Portugal. As such, we aimed to assess the effect on STEMI admissions and outcomes in Portuguese centers.
Methods
We conducted a single-center, observational, retrospective study including all patients admitted to our hospital due to STEMI between the date of the first SARS-CoV-2 case diagnosed in Portugal and the end of the state of emergency (March and April 2020). Patient characteristics and outcomes were assessed and compared with the same period of 2019.
Results
A total of 104 STEMI patients were assessed, 55 in 2019 and 49 in 2020 (-11%). There were no significant differences between groups regarding age (62±12 vs. 65±14 years, p=0.308), gender (84.8% vs. 77.6% males, p=0.295) or comorbidities. In the 2020 group, there was a significant decrease in the proportion of patients transported to the hospital in pre-hospital emergency medical transportation (38.2% vs. 20.4%, p=0.038), an increase in system delay (49 [30-110.25] vs. 140 [90-180] minutes, p=0.019), a higher Killip-Kimball class, with a decrease in class I (74.5% vs. 51%) and an increase in class III (1.8% vs. 8.2%) and IV (5.5% vs. 18.4%) (p=0.038), a greater incidence of vasoactive support (3.7% vs. 26.5%, p=0.001), invasive mechanic ventilation usage (3.6% vs. 14.3%, p=0.056), and an increase in severe left ventricular dysfunction at hospital discharge (3.6% vs. 16.3%, p=0.03). In-hospital mortality was 14.3% in the 2020 group and 7.3% in the 2019 group p=0.200).
Conclusion
Despite a lack of significant variation in the absolute number of STEMI admissions, there was an increase in STEMI clinical severity and significantly worse outcomes during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. An increase in system delay, impaired pre-hospital care and patient fear of in-hospital infection can partially justify these results and should be the target of future actions in further waves of the pandemic.