EDTA灌洗液对纤维桩into根管与通用粘接剂粘接的影响。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Yançanã Luizy Gruber, Thaís Emanuelle Bakaus, Alessandra Reis, Osnara Maria Mongruel Gomes, João Carlos Gomes, Giovana Mongruel Gomes
{"title":"EDTA灌洗液对纤维桩into根管与通用粘接剂粘接的影响。","authors":"Yançanã Luizy Gruber,&nbsp;Thaís Emanuelle Bakaus,&nbsp;Alessandra Reis,&nbsp;Osnara Maria Mongruel Gomes,&nbsp;João Carlos Gomes,&nbsp;Giovana Mongruel Gomes","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b1650173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of different concentrations of ethylene-diamine-tetra acetic acid (EDTA) on bond strength (BS) and nanoleakage (NL) of fiber posts bonded into root canals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy-two single roots were endodontically treated and divided into six groups (n = 12), according to the combination of the following factors: surface treatment (no irrigation [control], 17% EDTA, or 24% EDTA), and composite cement applied with an adhesive used in a self-etch mode (Single Bond Universal/RelyX Ultimate [SB], 3M Oral Care; Ambar Universal/Allcem [AM], FGM). After fiber post cementation, six 1-mm-thick disks were obtained for each root. Push-out bond strength (BS) was evaluated using 8 specimens per group, and the other 4 specimens were used to examine nanoleakage (NL). Data from BS and NL of each adhesive were evaluated by two-way ANOVA (surface treatment vs root region) and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The application of 17% and 24% EDTA did not influence the bond strengths of either adhesive. In general, the application of 17% and 24% EDTA increased NL values for both adhesives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-treatment with different concentrations of EDTA was not able to improve the adhesion of fiber posts into root canals with universal adhesives..</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"23 4","pages":"347-356"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of EDTA Concentrations as Irrigation Solution on Bonding of Fiber Posts into Root Canals with Universal Adhesives.\",\"authors\":\"Yançanã Luizy Gruber,&nbsp;Thaís Emanuelle Bakaus,&nbsp;Alessandra Reis,&nbsp;Osnara Maria Mongruel Gomes,&nbsp;João Carlos Gomes,&nbsp;Giovana Mongruel Gomes\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.jad.b1650173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of different concentrations of ethylene-diamine-tetra acetic acid (EDTA) on bond strength (BS) and nanoleakage (NL) of fiber posts bonded into root canals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy-two single roots were endodontically treated and divided into six groups (n = 12), according to the combination of the following factors: surface treatment (no irrigation [control], 17% EDTA, or 24% EDTA), and composite cement applied with an adhesive used in a self-etch mode (Single Bond Universal/RelyX Ultimate [SB], 3M Oral Care; Ambar Universal/Allcem [AM], FGM). After fiber post cementation, six 1-mm-thick disks were obtained for each root. Push-out bond strength (BS) was evaluated using 8 specimens per group, and the other 4 specimens were used to examine nanoleakage (NL). Data from BS and NL of each adhesive were evaluated by two-way ANOVA (surface treatment vs root region) and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The application of 17% and 24% EDTA did not influence the bond strengths of either adhesive. In general, the application of 17% and 24% EDTA increased NL values for both adhesives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-treatment with different concentrations of EDTA was not able to improve the adhesion of fiber posts into root canals with universal adhesives..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"347-356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b1650173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b1650173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价不同浓度的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)对纤维桩粘结into根canals的粘结强度(BS)和纳米渗漏(NL)的影响。材料和方法:对72根单根进行根管治疗,根据以下因素的组合分为6组(n = 12):表面处理(无冲洗[对照],17% EDTA,或24% EDTA),复合胶合剂应用于自蚀刻模式的粘合剂(single Bond Universal/RelyX Ultimate [SB], 3M Oral Care;Ambar Universal/Allcem [AM] [, FGM]]。纤维桩胶结后,每个根获得6个1 mm厚的盘。每组取8个试件进行推出粘结强度(BS)评估,其余4个试件进行纳米渗漏(NL)检测。采用双因素方差分析(表面处理vs根区)和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)对各胶粘剂的BS和NL数据进行评估。结果:应用17%和24% EDTA对两种胶粘剂的粘接强度of均无影响。总的来说,17%和24%的EDTA的应用增加了两种胶粘剂的NL值。结论:不同浓度的EDTA预处理均不能改善纤维桩into root canals与通用adhesives.的粘连性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of EDTA Concentrations as Irrigation Solution on Bonding of Fiber Posts into Root Canals with Universal Adhesives.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different concentrations of ethylene-diamine-tetra acetic acid (EDTA) on bond strength (BS) and nanoleakage (NL) of fiber posts bonded into root canals.

Materials and methods: Seventy-two single roots were endodontically treated and divided into six groups (n = 12), according to the combination of the following factors: surface treatment (no irrigation [control], 17% EDTA, or 24% EDTA), and composite cement applied with an adhesive used in a self-etch mode (Single Bond Universal/RelyX Ultimate [SB], 3M Oral Care; Ambar Universal/Allcem [AM], FGM). After fiber post cementation, six 1-mm-thick disks were obtained for each root. Push-out bond strength (BS) was evaluated using 8 specimens per group, and the other 4 specimens were used to examine nanoleakage (NL). Data from BS and NL of each adhesive were evaluated by two-way ANOVA (surface treatment vs root region) and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

Results: The application of 17% and 24% EDTA did not influence the bond strengths of either adhesive. In general, the application of 17% and 24% EDTA increased NL values for both adhesives.

Conclusion: Pre-treatment with different concentrations of EDTA was not able to improve the adhesion of fiber posts into root canals with universal adhesives..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信