良心的考虑。

IF 1.3 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Hec Forum Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-15 DOI:10.1007/s10730-021-09457-5
Bryan Pilkington
{"title":"良心的考虑。","authors":"Bryan Pilkington","doi":"10.1007/s10730-021-09457-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The proper role of conscience in healthcare continues to be a topic of deep interest for bioethicists, healthcare professionals, and health policy experts. This issue of HEC Forum brings together a collection of articles about features of these ongoing discussions of conscience, advancing the conversations about conscience in healthcare from a variety of perspectives and on a variety of fronts. Some articles in this issue take up particularly challenging cases of conscientious objection in practice, such as Fleming, Frith, and Ramsayer's contextually rich piece on midwives in Scotland or Harter's professionally grounded analysis; others engage the changing institutional landscapes which impact considerations of conscience, such as Cummins' work on the role of employers in institutional policies about conscience and Ben Moshe's discussion of publicity and institutional committees. Pieces by Howard and Pilkington both raise conceptual considerations about how we think about the role of conscience in medicine, questioning the use of \"conscientious objection\" in these discussions, and Byrnes pushes back on the most influential work in this area by Mark Wicclair. The issue concludes with a piece by Wicclair, which engages each of these distinct offerings, further extending the discussions of conscience in healthcare and helpfully connecting key themes discussed by authors in this issue to his contributions and to the longer tradition of discussions of conscience in medicine. This issue challenges readers to engage different arguments from different perspectives and asks them-in some cases-to be open to revising how they think about the role of conscience and the existence of and justification for conscientious objection in the dynamic, interdisciplinary fields of healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":46160,"journal":{"name":"Hec Forum","volume":"33 3","pages":"165-174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10730-021-09457-5","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations of Conscience.\",\"authors\":\"Bryan Pilkington\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10730-021-09457-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The proper role of conscience in healthcare continues to be a topic of deep interest for bioethicists, healthcare professionals, and health policy experts. This issue of HEC Forum brings together a collection of articles about features of these ongoing discussions of conscience, advancing the conversations about conscience in healthcare from a variety of perspectives and on a variety of fronts. Some articles in this issue take up particularly challenging cases of conscientious objection in practice, such as Fleming, Frith, and Ramsayer's contextually rich piece on midwives in Scotland or Harter's professionally grounded analysis; others engage the changing institutional landscapes which impact considerations of conscience, such as Cummins' work on the role of employers in institutional policies about conscience and Ben Moshe's discussion of publicity and institutional committees. Pieces by Howard and Pilkington both raise conceptual considerations about how we think about the role of conscience in medicine, questioning the use of \\\"conscientious objection\\\" in these discussions, and Byrnes pushes back on the most influential work in this area by Mark Wicclair. The issue concludes with a piece by Wicclair, which engages each of these distinct offerings, further extending the discussions of conscience in healthcare and helpfully connecting key themes discussed by authors in this issue to his contributions and to the longer tradition of discussions of conscience in medicine. This issue challenges readers to engage different arguments from different perspectives and asks them-in some cases-to be open to revising how they think about the role of conscience and the existence of and justification for conscientious objection in the dynamic, interdisciplinary fields of healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hec Forum\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"165-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10730-021-09457-5\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hec Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-021-09457-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hec Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-021-09457-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

良心在医疗保健中的适当作用仍然是生物伦理学家,医疗保健专业人员和卫生政策专家深感兴趣的话题。本期《HEC论坛》汇集了一系列关于这些正在进行的良心讨论的特点的文章,从不同的角度和不同的方面推进了关于医疗保健良知的对话。本刊的一些文章在实践中特别具有挑战性的良心反对案例,如弗莱明,弗里思和拉姆塞耶关于苏格兰助产士的背景丰富的文章或哈特的专业基础分析;其他人则关注影响良心考虑的不断变化的制度格局,例如康明斯关于雇主在有关良心的制度政策中的作用的研究,以及本·摩西关于宣传和制度委员会的讨论。霍华德(Howard)和皮尔金顿(Pilkington)的文章都提出了概念性的思考,即我们如何看待良心在医学中的作用,质疑在这些讨论中“良心反对”的使用,伯恩斯(Byrnes)反驳了马克·威克莱尔(Mark Wicclair)在这一领域最有影响力的作品。这期杂志以Wicclair的一篇文章作为结尾处,这篇文章涉及了这些不同的内容,进一步扩展了对医疗保健中的良心的讨论,并将本期作者讨论的关键主题与他的贡献以及医学中关于良心的讨论的更悠久的传统联系起来。这个问题向读者提出挑战,要求他们从不同的角度进行不同的争论,并要求他们在某些情况下,以开放的态度修改他们对良心的作用的看法,以及在动态的、跨学科的医疗保健领域中良心反对的存在和理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Considerations of Conscience.

The proper role of conscience in healthcare continues to be a topic of deep interest for bioethicists, healthcare professionals, and health policy experts. This issue of HEC Forum brings together a collection of articles about features of these ongoing discussions of conscience, advancing the conversations about conscience in healthcare from a variety of perspectives and on a variety of fronts. Some articles in this issue take up particularly challenging cases of conscientious objection in practice, such as Fleming, Frith, and Ramsayer's contextually rich piece on midwives in Scotland or Harter's professionally grounded analysis; others engage the changing institutional landscapes which impact considerations of conscience, such as Cummins' work on the role of employers in institutional policies about conscience and Ben Moshe's discussion of publicity and institutional committees. Pieces by Howard and Pilkington both raise conceptual considerations about how we think about the role of conscience in medicine, questioning the use of "conscientious objection" in these discussions, and Byrnes pushes back on the most influential work in this area by Mark Wicclair. The issue concludes with a piece by Wicclair, which engages each of these distinct offerings, further extending the discussions of conscience in healthcare and helpfully connecting key themes discussed by authors in this issue to his contributions and to the longer tradition of discussions of conscience in medicine. This issue challenges readers to engage different arguments from different perspectives and asks them-in some cases-to be open to revising how they think about the role of conscience and the existence of and justification for conscientious objection in the dynamic, interdisciplinary fields of healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hec Forum
Hec Forum ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: HEC Forum is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to practicing physicians, nurses, social workers, risk managers, attorneys, ethicists, and other HEC committee members. Contributions are welcomed from any pertinent source, but the text should be written to be appreciated by HEC members and lay readers. HEC Forum publishes essays, research papers, and features the following sections:Essays on Substantive Bioethical/Health Law Issues Analyses of Procedural or Operational Committee Issues Document Exchange Special Articles International Perspectives Mt./St. Anonymous: Cases and Institutional Policies Point/Counterpoint Argumentation Case Reviews, Analyses, and Resolutions Chairperson''s Section `Tough Spot'' Critical Annotations Health Law Alert Network News Letters to the Editors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信