PICU重症细支气管炎评分的推导和验证。

Michael C Mount, Xinge Ji, Michael W Kattan, Katherine N Slain, Jason A Clayton, Alexandre T Rotta, Steven L Shein
{"title":"PICU重症细支气管炎评分的推导和验证。","authors":"Michael C Mount,&nbsp;Xinge Ji,&nbsp;Michael W Kattan,&nbsp;Katherine N Slain,&nbsp;Jason A Clayton,&nbsp;Alexandre T Rotta,&nbsp;Steven L Shein","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000002808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To derive and internally validate a bronchiolitis-specific illness severity score (the Critical Bronchiolitis Score) that out-performs mortality-based illness severity scores (e.g., Pediatric Risk of Mortality) in measuring expected duration of respiratory support and PICU length of stay for critically ill children with bronchiolitis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective database study using the Virtual Pediatric Systems (VPS, LLC; Los Angeles, CA) database.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>One-hundred twenty-eight North-American PICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Fourteen-thousand four-hundred seven children less than 2 years old admitted to a contributing PICU with primary diagnosis of bronchiolitis and use of ICU-level respiratory support (defined as high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, or negative pressure ventilation) at 12 hours after PICU admission.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patient-level variables available at 12 hours from PICU admission, duration of ICU-level respiratory support, and PICU length of stay data were extracted for analysis. After randomly dividing the cohort into derivation and validation groups, patient-level variables that were significantly associated with the study outcomes were selected in a stepwise backward fashion for inclusion in the final score. Score performance in the validation cohort was assessed using root mean squared error and mean absolute error, and performance was compared with that of existing PICU illness severity scores.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Twelve commonly available patient-level variables were included in the Critical Bronchiolitis Score. Outcomes calculated with the score were similar to actual outcomes in the validation cohort. The Critical Bronchiolitis Score demonstrated a statistically significantly stronger association with duration of ICU-level respiratory support and PICU length of stay than mortality-based scores as measured by root mean squared error and mean absolute error.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Critical Bronchiolitis Score performed better than PICU mortality-based scores in measuring expected duration of ICU-level respiratory support and ICU length of stay. This score may have utility to enrich interventional trials and adjust for illness severity in observational studies in this very common PICU condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":520744,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies","volume":" ","pages":"e45-e54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivation and Validation of the Critical Bronchiolitis Score for the PICU.\",\"authors\":\"Michael C Mount,&nbsp;Xinge Ji,&nbsp;Michael W Kattan,&nbsp;Katherine N Slain,&nbsp;Jason A Clayton,&nbsp;Alexandre T Rotta,&nbsp;Steven L Shein\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PCC.0000000000002808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To derive and internally validate a bronchiolitis-specific illness severity score (the Critical Bronchiolitis Score) that out-performs mortality-based illness severity scores (e.g., Pediatric Risk of Mortality) in measuring expected duration of respiratory support and PICU length of stay for critically ill children with bronchiolitis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective database study using the Virtual Pediatric Systems (VPS, LLC; Los Angeles, CA) database.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>One-hundred twenty-eight North-American PICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Fourteen-thousand four-hundred seven children less than 2 years old admitted to a contributing PICU with primary diagnosis of bronchiolitis and use of ICU-level respiratory support (defined as high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, or negative pressure ventilation) at 12 hours after PICU admission.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patient-level variables available at 12 hours from PICU admission, duration of ICU-level respiratory support, and PICU length of stay data were extracted for analysis. After randomly dividing the cohort into derivation and validation groups, patient-level variables that were significantly associated with the study outcomes were selected in a stepwise backward fashion for inclusion in the final score. Score performance in the validation cohort was assessed using root mean squared error and mean absolute error, and performance was compared with that of existing PICU illness severity scores.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Twelve commonly available patient-level variables were included in the Critical Bronchiolitis Score. Outcomes calculated with the score were similar to actual outcomes in the validation cohort. The Critical Bronchiolitis Score demonstrated a statistically significantly stronger association with duration of ICU-level respiratory support and PICU length of stay than mortality-based scores as measured by root mean squared error and mean absolute error.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Critical Bronchiolitis Score performed better than PICU mortality-based scores in measuring expected duration of ICU-level respiratory support and ICU length of stay. This score may have utility to enrich interventional trials and adjust for illness severity in observational studies in this very common PICU condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e45-e54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目的:推导并内部验证毛细支气管炎特异性疾病严重程度评分(重症毛细支气管炎评分),该评分优于基于死亡率的疾病严重程度评分(例如,儿科死亡风险),用于测量毛细支气管炎危重患儿的预期呼吸支持持续时间和PICU住院时间。设计:使用虚拟儿科系统(VPS, LLC)进行回顾性数据库研究;洛杉矶,加州)数据库。设置:128个北美picu。患者:在PICU入院12小时后,14447名2岁以下的儿童因初步诊断为细支气管炎并使用icu级别的呼吸支持(定义为高流量鼻插管、无创通气、有创机械通气或负压通气)而入住PICU。干预措施:提取PICU入院后12小时的患者水平变量、icu级别呼吸支持持续时间和PICU住院时间数据进行分析。在将队列随机分为衍生组和验证组后,以逐步向后的方式选择与研究结果显著相关的患者水平变量纳入最终评分。使用均方根误差和平均绝对误差评估验证队列中的评分表现,并将其与现有PICU疾病严重程度评分进行比较。测量和主要结果:12个常见的患者水平变量被纳入临界细支气管炎评分。用该评分计算的结果与验证队列中的实际结果相似。通过均方根误差和平均绝对误差测量,重症细支气管炎评分与icu级别呼吸支持持续时间和PICU住院时间的相关性在统计学上显著高于基于死亡率的评分。结论:重症细支气管炎评分在衡量ICU级别呼吸支持的预期持续时间和ICU住院时间方面优于PICU基于死亡率的评分。该评分可能有助于丰富介入试验,并在观察性研究中调整这种非常常见的PICU疾病的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Derivation and Validation of the Critical Bronchiolitis Score for the PICU.

Objectives: To derive and internally validate a bronchiolitis-specific illness severity score (the Critical Bronchiolitis Score) that out-performs mortality-based illness severity scores (e.g., Pediatric Risk of Mortality) in measuring expected duration of respiratory support and PICU length of stay for critically ill children with bronchiolitis.

Design: Retrospective database study using the Virtual Pediatric Systems (VPS, LLC; Los Angeles, CA) database.

Setting: One-hundred twenty-eight North-American PICUs.

Patients: Fourteen-thousand four-hundred seven children less than 2 years old admitted to a contributing PICU with primary diagnosis of bronchiolitis and use of ICU-level respiratory support (defined as high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, or negative pressure ventilation) at 12 hours after PICU admission.

Interventions: Patient-level variables available at 12 hours from PICU admission, duration of ICU-level respiratory support, and PICU length of stay data were extracted for analysis. After randomly dividing the cohort into derivation and validation groups, patient-level variables that were significantly associated with the study outcomes were selected in a stepwise backward fashion for inclusion in the final score. Score performance in the validation cohort was assessed using root mean squared error and mean absolute error, and performance was compared with that of existing PICU illness severity scores.

Measurements and main results: Twelve commonly available patient-level variables were included in the Critical Bronchiolitis Score. Outcomes calculated with the score were similar to actual outcomes in the validation cohort. The Critical Bronchiolitis Score demonstrated a statistically significantly stronger association with duration of ICU-level respiratory support and PICU length of stay than mortality-based scores as measured by root mean squared error and mean absolute error.

Conclusions: The Critical Bronchiolitis Score performed better than PICU mortality-based scores in measuring expected duration of ICU-level respiratory support and ICU length of stay. This score may have utility to enrich interventional trials and adjust for illness severity in observational studies in this very common PICU condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信