老年门诊患者降压治疗强化与去强化的相关因素

Q4 Medicine
Carole E. Aubert , Jin-Kyung Ha , Eve A. Kerr , Timothy P. Hofer , Lillian Min
{"title":"老年门诊患者降压治疗强化与去强化的相关因素","authors":"Carole E. Aubert ,&nbsp;Jin-Kyung Ha ,&nbsp;Eve A. Kerr ,&nbsp;Timothy P. Hofer ,&nbsp;Lillian Min","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchy.2021.100098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>New hypertension performance measures encourage more intensive treatment in older adults. Treatment intensification includes starting new medications and increasing the dose of old ones. Medication dose is particularly important to older adults, given their vulnerability to dose-related side effects. We previously validated a standardized measure of beneficial doses tested in hypertension trials, Hypertension Daily Dose (HDD).</p></div><div><h3>Aim of the study</h3><p>To test whether changes in treatment intensity using HDD was associated with systolic blood pressure (SBP) and patient characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Longitudinal study of all Veterans aged ≥65 years with a diagnosis of hypertension. We defined 3 groups of risk: 1) cardiovascular risk; 2) geriatric/frail; 3) low-risk (comparator). Using multinomial regression, we assessed the probability of deintensification, intensification, vs. stable treatment, according to SBP and group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 1,331,111 Veterans, 19.9% had deintensification, and 29.6% intensification. Deintensification decreased, while intensification increased, with SBP. Compared to low-risk patients, cardiovascular risk patients had 1.11 (95% CI 1.10–1.13) times the odds of intensifying, and geriatric/frail patients 1.45 (95%CI 1.43–1.47) times the odds of deintensifying.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Patient-level HDD change was consistent with an expected association with cardiovascular risk and geriatric/frail conditions, suggesting that HDD can be used longitudinally to assess hypertension treatment modification in large health systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36839,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100098"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijchy.2021.100098","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with antihypertensive treatment intensification and deintensification in older outpatients\",\"authors\":\"Carole E. Aubert ,&nbsp;Jin-Kyung Ha ,&nbsp;Eve A. Kerr ,&nbsp;Timothy P. Hofer ,&nbsp;Lillian Min\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijchy.2021.100098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>New hypertension performance measures encourage more intensive treatment in older adults. Treatment intensification includes starting new medications and increasing the dose of old ones. Medication dose is particularly important to older adults, given their vulnerability to dose-related side effects. We previously validated a standardized measure of beneficial doses tested in hypertension trials, Hypertension Daily Dose (HDD).</p></div><div><h3>Aim of the study</h3><p>To test whether changes in treatment intensity using HDD was associated with systolic blood pressure (SBP) and patient characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Longitudinal study of all Veterans aged ≥65 years with a diagnosis of hypertension. We defined 3 groups of risk: 1) cardiovascular risk; 2) geriatric/frail; 3) low-risk (comparator). Using multinomial regression, we assessed the probability of deintensification, intensification, vs. stable treatment, according to SBP and group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 1,331,111 Veterans, 19.9% had deintensification, and 29.6% intensification. Deintensification decreased, while intensification increased, with SBP. Compared to low-risk patients, cardiovascular risk patients had 1.11 (95% CI 1.10–1.13) times the odds of intensifying, and geriatric/frail patients 1.45 (95%CI 1.43–1.47) times the odds of deintensifying.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Patient-level HDD change was consistent with an expected association with cardiovascular risk and geriatric/frail conditions, suggesting that HDD can be used longitudinally to assess hypertension treatment modification in large health systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100098\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijchy.2021.100098\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590086221000173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590086221000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新的高血压表现指标鼓励老年人进行更强化的治疗。治疗强化包括开始使用新药物和增加旧药物的剂量。药物剂量对老年人尤其重要,因为他们容易受到剂量相关副作用的影响。我们之前验证了在高血压试验中测试的有益剂量的标准化测量,高血压日剂量(HDD)。研究的目的是测试HDD治疗强度的变化是否与收缩压(SBP)和患者特征相关。方法对所有年龄≥65岁、诊断为高血压的退伍军人进行纵向研究。我们定义了3组风险:1)心血管风险;2)老年/虚弱;3)低风险(比较者)。使用多项回归,我们根据收缩压和组评估去强化、强化和稳定治疗的概率。结果13331111名退伍军人中,去强化率为19.9%,强化率为29.6%。随着收缩压的增加,去强化减弱,强化增强。与低风险患者相比,心血管风险患者强化的几率为1.11倍(95%CI 1.10-1.13),老年/体弱患者去强化的几率为1.45倍(95%CI 1.43-1.47)。患者水平的HDD变化与心血管风险和老年/虚弱状况的预期关联是一致的,这表明HDD可以纵向用于评估大型卫生系统中高血压治疗的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Factors associated with antihypertensive treatment intensification and deintensification in older outpatients

Factors associated with antihypertensive treatment intensification and deintensification in older outpatients

Factors associated with antihypertensive treatment intensification and deintensification in older outpatients

Background

New hypertension performance measures encourage more intensive treatment in older adults. Treatment intensification includes starting new medications and increasing the dose of old ones. Medication dose is particularly important to older adults, given their vulnerability to dose-related side effects. We previously validated a standardized measure of beneficial doses tested in hypertension trials, Hypertension Daily Dose (HDD).

Aim of the study

To test whether changes in treatment intensity using HDD was associated with systolic blood pressure (SBP) and patient characteristics.

Methods

Longitudinal study of all Veterans aged ≥65 years with a diagnosis of hypertension. We defined 3 groups of risk: 1) cardiovascular risk; 2) geriatric/frail; 3) low-risk (comparator). Using multinomial regression, we assessed the probability of deintensification, intensification, vs. stable treatment, according to SBP and group.

Results

Among 1,331,111 Veterans, 19.9% had deintensification, and 29.6% intensification. Deintensification decreased, while intensification increased, with SBP. Compared to low-risk patients, cardiovascular risk patients had 1.11 (95% CI 1.10–1.13) times the odds of intensifying, and geriatric/frail patients 1.45 (95%CI 1.43–1.47) times the odds of deintensifying.

Discussion

Patient-level HDD change was consistent with an expected association with cardiovascular risk and geriatric/frail conditions, suggesting that HDD can be used longitudinally to assess hypertension treatment modification in large health systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension
International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信