后续掩蔽噪声对言语回忆的影响:实验2的重复。

Auditory perception & cognition Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-15 DOI:10.1080/25742442.2021.1896908
Claire Guang, Emmett Lefkowitz, Naseem Dillman-Hasso, Violet A Brown, Julia F Strand
{"title":"后续掩蔽噪声对言语回忆的影响:实验2的重复。","authors":"Claire Guang,&nbsp;Emmett Lefkowitz,&nbsp;Naseem Dillman-Hasso,&nbsp;Violet A Brown,&nbsp;Julia F Strand","doi":"10.1080/25742442.2021.1896908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The presence of masking noise can impair speech intelligibility and increase the attentional and cognitive resources necessary to understand speech. The first study to demonstrate the negative cognitive effects of noisy speech found that participants had poorer recall for aurally-presented digits early in a list when later digits were presented in noise relative to quiet (Rabbitt, 1968). However, despite being cited nearly 500 times and providing the foundation for a wealth of subsequent research on the topic, the original study has never been directly replicated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study replicated Rabbitt (1968) with a large online sample and tested its robustness to a variety of analytical and scoring techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We replicated Rabbitt's key finding that listening to speech in noise impairs recall for items that came earlier in the list. The results were consistent when we used the original analytical technique (an ANOVA) and a more powerful analytical technique (generalized linear mixed effects models) that was not available when the original paper was published.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings support the claim that effortful listening can interfere with encoding or rehearsal of previously presented information.</p>","PeriodicalId":72332,"journal":{"name":"Auditory perception & cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25742442.2021.1896908","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recall of Speech is Impaired by Subsequent Masking Noise: A Replication of Experiment 2.\",\"authors\":\"Claire Guang,&nbsp;Emmett Lefkowitz,&nbsp;Naseem Dillman-Hasso,&nbsp;Violet A Brown,&nbsp;Julia F Strand\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25742442.2021.1896908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The presence of masking noise can impair speech intelligibility and increase the attentional and cognitive resources necessary to understand speech. The first study to demonstrate the negative cognitive effects of noisy speech found that participants had poorer recall for aurally-presented digits early in a list when later digits were presented in noise relative to quiet (Rabbitt, 1968). However, despite being cited nearly 500 times and providing the foundation for a wealth of subsequent research on the topic, the original study has never been directly replicated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study replicated Rabbitt (1968) with a large online sample and tested its robustness to a variety of analytical and scoring techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We replicated Rabbitt's key finding that listening to speech in noise impairs recall for items that came earlier in the list. The results were consistent when we used the original analytical technique (an ANOVA) and a more powerful analytical technique (generalized linear mixed effects models) that was not available when the original paper was published.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings support the claim that effortful listening can interfere with encoding or rehearsal of previously presented information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditory perception & cognition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25742442.2021.1896908\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditory perception & cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2021.1896908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory perception & cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2021.1896908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

掩蔽噪声的存在会损害语音的可理解性,增加理解语音所必需的注意力和认知资源。第一个证明嘈杂言语的负面认知影响的研究发现,当参与者在嘈杂中呈现较晚的数字时,他们对列表中较早的数字的记忆力较差(rabbit, 1968)。然而,尽管该研究被引用了近500次,并为后续关于该主题的大量研究提供了基础,但最初的研究从未被直接复制。方法:本研究使用大量在线样本复制rabbit(1968),并测试其对各种分析和评分技术的稳健性。结果:我们重复了rabbit的关键发现,即在噪音中听讲话会损害对列表中较早出现的项目的回忆。当我们使用原始分析技术(方差分析)和更强大的分析技术(广义线性混合效应模型)时,结果是一致的,这在原始论文发表时是不可用的。讨论:这些发现支持了一种说法,即努力倾听会干扰对先前呈现信息的编码或排练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recall of Speech is Impaired by Subsequent Masking Noise: A Replication of Experiment 2.

Introduction: The presence of masking noise can impair speech intelligibility and increase the attentional and cognitive resources necessary to understand speech. The first study to demonstrate the negative cognitive effects of noisy speech found that participants had poorer recall for aurally-presented digits early in a list when later digits were presented in noise relative to quiet (Rabbitt, 1968). However, despite being cited nearly 500 times and providing the foundation for a wealth of subsequent research on the topic, the original study has never been directly replicated.

Methods: This study replicated Rabbitt (1968) with a large online sample and tested its robustness to a variety of analytical and scoring techniques.

Results: We replicated Rabbitt's key finding that listening to speech in noise impairs recall for items that came earlier in the list. The results were consistent when we used the original analytical technique (an ANOVA) and a more powerful analytical technique (generalized linear mixed effects models) that was not available when the original paper was published.

Discussion: These findings support the claim that effortful listening can interfere with encoding or rehearsal of previously presented information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信