原发性肩关节僵硬的治疗:意大利外科医生实践模式的调查结果。

Q1 Medicine
Joints Pub Date : 2021-06-18 eCollection Date: 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1730983
Davide Cucchi, Silvana De Giorgi, Maristella F Saccomanno, Francesco Uboldi, Alessandra Menon, Max J Friedrich, Sebastian G Walter, Laura de Girolamo
{"title":"原发性肩关节僵硬的治疗:意大利外科医生实践模式的调查结果。","authors":"Davide Cucchi,&nbsp;Silvana De Giorgi,&nbsp;Maristella F Saccomanno,&nbsp;Francesco Uboldi,&nbsp;Alessandra Menon,&nbsp;Max J Friedrich,&nbsp;Sebastian G Walter,&nbsp;Laura de Girolamo","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1730983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>  Shoulder stiffness is a condition of restricted glenohumeral range of motion (ROM), which can arise spontaneously or as consequence of a known cause. Several treatment options are available and currently no consensus has been obtained on which treatment algorithm represents the best choice for the patient. The aim of this study was to investigate surgeon practice patterns in Italy regarding treatment of primary shoulder stiffness. <b>Methods</b>  A literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials reporting results of shoulder stiffness treatment. The following controversial or critical points in the treatment of primary shoulder stiffness were identified: modalities of physical therapy; indication for oral corticosteroid; indication and frequency for injective corticosteroid; technique and site of injection; and indication, timing, and technique for surgery. A survey composed by 14 questions was created and administrated to the members of a national association specialized in orthopaedics and sports traumatology (SIGASCOT at the time of survey completion, recently renamed SIAGASCOT after the fusion of the societies SIGASCOT and SIA). <b>Results</b>  A total of 204 completed questionnaires were collected. Physical therapy was recommended by 98% of the interviewed. The use of oral corticosteroids was considered by 51%, and injections of corticosteroids by 72%. The posterior injection approach was the one preferred and a number of three was considered the upper limit for repeated injections. Injective therapy with local anesthetics and hyaluronic acid was considered by more than 20% of the interviewed. Thirty percent of the interviewed did not treat shoulder stiffness surgically. <b>Conclusion</b>  Several approaches to shoulder stiffness have been proposed and high-level evidence is available to analyze and discuss their results. Several controversial points emerged both from a literature review and from this national survey. Treatment of shoulder stiffness should be tailored to the patient's clinical situation and the stage of its pathology and should aim at pain reduction, ROM restoration, functional regain, and shortening of symptoms duration, with conservative therapy remaining the mainstay of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":37852,"journal":{"name":"Joints","volume":"7 4","pages":"165-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0041-1730983","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of Primary Shoulder Stiffness: Results of a Survey on Surgeon Practice Patterns in Italy.\",\"authors\":\"Davide Cucchi,&nbsp;Silvana De Giorgi,&nbsp;Maristella F Saccomanno,&nbsp;Francesco Uboldi,&nbsp;Alessandra Menon,&nbsp;Max J Friedrich,&nbsp;Sebastian G Walter,&nbsp;Laura de Girolamo\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1730983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>  Shoulder stiffness is a condition of restricted glenohumeral range of motion (ROM), which can arise spontaneously or as consequence of a known cause. Several treatment options are available and currently no consensus has been obtained on which treatment algorithm represents the best choice for the patient. The aim of this study was to investigate surgeon practice patterns in Italy regarding treatment of primary shoulder stiffness. <b>Methods</b>  A literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials reporting results of shoulder stiffness treatment. The following controversial or critical points in the treatment of primary shoulder stiffness were identified: modalities of physical therapy; indication for oral corticosteroid; indication and frequency for injective corticosteroid; technique and site of injection; and indication, timing, and technique for surgery. A survey composed by 14 questions was created and administrated to the members of a national association specialized in orthopaedics and sports traumatology (SIGASCOT at the time of survey completion, recently renamed SIAGASCOT after the fusion of the societies SIGASCOT and SIA). <b>Results</b>  A total of 204 completed questionnaires were collected. Physical therapy was recommended by 98% of the interviewed. The use of oral corticosteroids was considered by 51%, and injections of corticosteroids by 72%. The posterior injection approach was the one preferred and a number of three was considered the upper limit for repeated injections. Injective therapy with local anesthetics and hyaluronic acid was considered by more than 20% of the interviewed. Thirty percent of the interviewed did not treat shoulder stiffness surgically. <b>Conclusion</b>  Several approaches to shoulder stiffness have been proposed and high-level evidence is available to analyze and discuss their results. Several controversial points emerged both from a literature review and from this national survey. Treatment of shoulder stiffness should be tailored to the patient's clinical situation and the stage of its pathology and should aim at pain reduction, ROM restoration, functional regain, and shortening of symptoms duration, with conservative therapy remaining the mainstay of treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joints\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"165-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0041-1730983\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joints\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730983\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joints","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肩关节僵硬是肩关节活动范围受限的一种情况,它可以自发产生,也可以是已知原因的结果。有几种治疗方案可供选择,目前尚未就哪种治疗算法代表患者的最佳选择达成共识。本研究的目的是调查意大利外科医生治疗原发性肩关节僵硬的实践模式。方法对报道肩关节僵硬治疗结果的随机对照试验进行文献回顾。确定了原发性肩关节僵硬治疗中的以下争议或关键点:物理治疗的方式;口服皮质类固醇的适应症;注射皮质类固醇的适应症和频率;注射方法及部位;以及手术的适应症,时机和技术。一项由14个问题组成的调查由一个专门从事骨科和运动创伤学的国家协会(调查完成时为SIGASCOT,最近在SIGASCOT和SIA学会合并后更名为SIAGASCOT)的成员组成。结果共回收问卷204份。98%的受访者建议进行物理治疗。51%的人考虑使用口服糖皮质激素,72%的人考虑注射糖皮质激素。后路注射入路是首选,3次被认为是重复注射的上限。超过20%的受访者考虑局部麻醉剂和透明质酸的注射治疗。30%的受访者没有通过手术治疗肩关节僵硬。结论提出了几种治疗肩部僵硬的方法,并有高水平的证据来分析和讨论其结果。从文献综述和这次全国调查中出现了几个有争议的观点。肩关节僵硬的治疗应根据患者的临床情况和病理阶段进行调整,以减轻疼痛、恢复活动空间、恢复功能、缩短症状持续时间为目标,以保守治疗为主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Treatment of Primary Shoulder Stiffness: Results of a Survey on Surgeon Practice Patterns in Italy.

Treatment of Primary Shoulder Stiffness: Results of a Survey on Surgeon Practice Patterns in Italy.

Treatment of Primary Shoulder Stiffness: Results of a Survey on Surgeon Practice Patterns in Italy.

Treatment of Primary Shoulder Stiffness: Results of a Survey on Surgeon Practice Patterns in Italy.

Objectives  Shoulder stiffness is a condition of restricted glenohumeral range of motion (ROM), which can arise spontaneously or as consequence of a known cause. Several treatment options are available and currently no consensus has been obtained on which treatment algorithm represents the best choice for the patient. The aim of this study was to investigate surgeon practice patterns in Italy regarding treatment of primary shoulder stiffness. Methods  A literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials reporting results of shoulder stiffness treatment. The following controversial or critical points in the treatment of primary shoulder stiffness were identified: modalities of physical therapy; indication for oral corticosteroid; indication and frequency for injective corticosteroid; technique and site of injection; and indication, timing, and technique for surgery. A survey composed by 14 questions was created and administrated to the members of a national association specialized in orthopaedics and sports traumatology (SIGASCOT at the time of survey completion, recently renamed SIAGASCOT after the fusion of the societies SIGASCOT and SIA). Results  A total of 204 completed questionnaires were collected. Physical therapy was recommended by 98% of the interviewed. The use of oral corticosteroids was considered by 51%, and injections of corticosteroids by 72%. The posterior injection approach was the one preferred and a number of three was considered the upper limit for repeated injections. Injective therapy with local anesthetics and hyaluronic acid was considered by more than 20% of the interviewed. Thirty percent of the interviewed did not treat shoulder stiffness surgically. Conclusion  Several approaches to shoulder stiffness have been proposed and high-level evidence is available to analyze and discuss their results. Several controversial points emerged both from a literature review and from this national survey. Treatment of shoulder stiffness should be tailored to the patient's clinical situation and the stage of its pathology and should aim at pain reduction, ROM restoration, functional regain, and shortening of symptoms duration, with conservative therapy remaining the mainstay of treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Joints
Joints Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Joints is the official publication of SIGASCOT (Italian Society of the Knee, Arthroscopy, Sports Traumatology, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technology). As an Open Acccess journal, it publishes papers on clinical and basic research, review articles, technical notes, case reports, and editorials about the latest developments in knee surgery, arthroscopy, sports traumatology, cartilage, orthopaedic technology, upper limb, and related rehabilitation. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal''s content are always welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信