人子宫内膜液在自然循环中的抗菌和抗真菌活性。

Q2 Medicine
Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology Pub Date : 2021-06-16 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/8849664
Marta Bregón-Villahoz, Maria-Dolores Moragues, Inés Arrieta-Aguirre, Mikel Azkargorta, Lucía Lainz, Miren Diez-Zapirain, Maria Iglesias, Maria-Begoña Prieto, Ana Matorras, Antonia Exposito, Felix Elortza, Roberto Matorras
{"title":"人子宫内膜液在自然循环中的抗菌和抗真菌活性。","authors":"Marta Bregón-Villahoz,&nbsp;Maria-Dolores Moragues,&nbsp;Inés Arrieta-Aguirre,&nbsp;Mikel Azkargorta,&nbsp;Lucía Lainz,&nbsp;Miren Diez-Zapirain,&nbsp;Maria Iglesias,&nbsp;Maria-Begoña Prieto,&nbsp;Ana Matorras,&nbsp;Antonia Exposito,&nbsp;Felix Elortza,&nbsp;Roberto Matorras","doi":"10.1155/2021/8849664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Some microbiota patterns have been associated with favorable IVF prognosis and others with pathological conditions. The endometrial fluid aspirate (EFA) contains antibacterial proteins that are enriched in implantative IVF cycles, but the antimicrobial effect of EFA has not been addressed. We aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the human endometrial fluid during the natural cycle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EFA was obtained through an embryo transfer catheter in 38 women, aged 18-40 years, with regular cycles attending to a fertility clinic. The antimicrobial activity of EFAs was tested against two strains of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>; one strain each of <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i>, <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, <i>Escherichia coli</i>, and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>; and three yeasts (<i>Candida albicans</i>, <i>Candida glabrata</i>, and <i>Candida krusei</i>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All samples exhibited antibacterial activity against <i>S. aureus</i>. In addition, 32.4% of EFAs were active against one of the other microorganisms assayed, 16.2% against two, and 5.4% against four of them. In contrast, none exhibited antibacterial activity against <i>E. coli</i> or <i>K. pneumoniae</i>. The antimicrobial activity differs considerably between EFA samples, and we failed to observe a cycle-related pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EFA presented two antimicrobial activity patterns: (a) one common to all the samples, exhibiting activity against <i>S. aureus</i> and lack of activity against <i>E. coli</i> and <i>K. pneumoniae</i>, and (b) an individualized pattern, showing activity against some of the other microorganisms tested. The intensity of antibacterial activity differs between EFA samples. Our data suggest that the uterine microbiota is controlled by means of endometrial fluid components.</p>","PeriodicalId":13546,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"2021 ","pages":"8849664"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221874/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity of the Human Endometrial Fluid during the Natural Cycle.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Bregón-Villahoz,&nbsp;Maria-Dolores Moragues,&nbsp;Inés Arrieta-Aguirre,&nbsp;Mikel Azkargorta,&nbsp;Lucía Lainz,&nbsp;Miren Diez-Zapirain,&nbsp;Maria Iglesias,&nbsp;Maria-Begoña Prieto,&nbsp;Ana Matorras,&nbsp;Antonia Exposito,&nbsp;Felix Elortza,&nbsp;Roberto Matorras\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/8849664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Some microbiota patterns have been associated with favorable IVF prognosis and others with pathological conditions. The endometrial fluid aspirate (EFA) contains antibacterial proteins that are enriched in implantative IVF cycles, but the antimicrobial effect of EFA has not been addressed. We aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the human endometrial fluid during the natural cycle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EFA was obtained through an embryo transfer catheter in 38 women, aged 18-40 years, with regular cycles attending to a fertility clinic. The antimicrobial activity of EFAs was tested against two strains of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>; one strain each of <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i>, <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, <i>Escherichia coli</i>, and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>; and three yeasts (<i>Candida albicans</i>, <i>Candida glabrata</i>, and <i>Candida krusei</i>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All samples exhibited antibacterial activity against <i>S. aureus</i>. In addition, 32.4% of EFAs were active against one of the other microorganisms assayed, 16.2% against two, and 5.4% against four of them. In contrast, none exhibited antibacterial activity against <i>E. coli</i> or <i>K. pneumoniae</i>. The antimicrobial activity differs considerably between EFA samples, and we failed to observe a cycle-related pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EFA presented two antimicrobial activity patterns: (a) one common to all the samples, exhibiting activity against <i>S. aureus</i> and lack of activity against <i>E. coli</i> and <i>K. pneumoniae</i>, and (b) an individualized pattern, showing activity against some of the other microorganisms tested. The intensity of antibacterial activity differs between EFA samples. Our data suggest that the uterine microbiota is controlled by means of endometrial fluid components.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"2021 \",\"pages\":\"8849664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8221874/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8849664\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8849664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:一些微生物群模式与试管婴儿的良好预后有关,而另一些则与病理状况有关。子宫内膜液(EFA)含有抗菌蛋白,在植入IVF周期中富集,但EFA的抗菌作用尚未得到解决。我们的目的是评价人子宫内膜液在自然循环中的抗菌活性。方法:38名年龄在18-40岁、月经周期规律的女性通过胚胎移植导管获得EFA。研究了EFAs对两株金黄色葡萄球菌的抑菌活性;无乳链球菌、粪肠球菌、大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌各1株;三种酵母菌(白色念珠菌、光秃念珠菌和克鲁西念珠菌)。结果:所有样品均表现出对金黄色葡萄球菌的抗菌活性。此外,32.4%的EFAs对一种微生物有活性,对两种微生物有16.2%的活性,对四种微生物有5.4%的活性。相比之下,没有显示出对大肠杆菌或肺炎克雷伯菌的抗菌活性。EFA样品的抗菌活性差异很大,我们没有观察到周期相关的模式。结论:EFA呈现出两种抗菌活性模式:(a)所有样品共有的一种模式,对金黄色葡萄球菌有活性,对大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌缺乏活性;(b)个别化模式,对其他一些被测微生物有活性。不同EFA样品的抗菌活性强度不同。我们的数据表明,子宫微生物群是由子宫内膜液成分控制的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity of the Human Endometrial Fluid during the Natural Cycle.

Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity of the Human Endometrial Fluid during the Natural Cycle.

Purpose: Some microbiota patterns have been associated with favorable IVF prognosis and others with pathological conditions. The endometrial fluid aspirate (EFA) contains antibacterial proteins that are enriched in implantative IVF cycles, but the antimicrobial effect of EFA has not been addressed. We aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the human endometrial fluid during the natural cycle.

Methods: EFA was obtained through an embryo transfer catheter in 38 women, aged 18-40 years, with regular cycles attending to a fertility clinic. The antimicrobial activity of EFAs was tested against two strains of Staphylococcus aureus; one strain each of Streptococcus agalactiae, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae; and three yeasts (Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Candida krusei).

Results: All samples exhibited antibacterial activity against S. aureus. In addition, 32.4% of EFAs were active against one of the other microorganisms assayed, 16.2% against two, and 5.4% against four of them. In contrast, none exhibited antibacterial activity against E. coli or K. pneumoniae. The antimicrobial activity differs considerably between EFA samples, and we failed to observe a cycle-related pattern.

Conclusions: EFA presented two antimicrobial activity patterns: (a) one common to all the samples, exhibiting activity against S. aureus and lack of activity against E. coli and K. pneumoniae, and (b) an individualized pattern, showing activity against some of the other microorganisms tested. The intensity of antibacterial activity differs between EFA samples. Our data suggest that the uterine microbiota is controlled by means of endometrial fluid components.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology aims to disseminate new and important information to clinicians and other health care providers, scientists, and researchers involved in the study or treatment of infectious diseases, especially those affecting the female patient. Its ultimate aim is to advance knowledge and encourage research, thereby improving the prevention or diagnosis and treatment of patients affected by such diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信