根据跨多州卫生系统合成的真实证据,fda批准的mRNA COVID-19疫苗是有效的。

Med (New York, N.y.) Pub Date : 2021-08-13 Epub Date: 2021-06-29 DOI:10.1016/j.medj.2021.06.007
Colin Pawlowski, Patrick Lenehan, Arjun Puranik, Vineet Agarwal, A J Venkatakrishnan, Michiel J M Niesen, John C O'Horo, Abinash Virk, Melanie D Swift, Andrew D Badley, John Halamka, Venky Soundararajan
{"title":"根据跨多州卫生系统合成的真实证据,fda批准的mRNA COVID-19疫苗是有效的。","authors":"Colin Pawlowski,&nbsp;Patrick Lenehan,&nbsp;Arjun Puranik,&nbsp;Vineet Agarwal,&nbsp;A J Venkatakrishnan,&nbsp;Michiel J M Niesen,&nbsp;John C O'Horo,&nbsp;Abinash Virk,&nbsp;Melanie D Swift,&nbsp;Andrew D Badley,&nbsp;John Halamka,&nbsp;Venky Soundararajan","doi":"10.1016/j.medj.2021.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-authorized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines, BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna), have demonstrated high efficacy in large phase 3 randomized clinical trials. It is important to assess their effectiveness in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of 136,532 individuals in the Mayo Clinic health system (Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) with PCR testing data between December 1, 2020 and April 20, 2021. We compared clinical outcomes for a vaccinated cohort of 68,266 individuals who received at least one dose of either vaccine (n<sub>BNT162b2</sub> = 51,795; n<sub>mRNA-1273</sub> = 16,471) and an unvaccinated control cohort of 68,266 individuals propensity matched based on relevant demographic, clinical, and geographic features. We estimated real-world vaccine effectiveness by comparing incidence rates of positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR testing and COVID-19-associated hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) admission starting 7 days after the second vaccine dose.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The real-world vaccine effectiveness of preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection was 86.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.4%-89.1%) for BNT162b2 and 93.3% (95% CI: 85.7%-97.4%) for mRNA-1273. BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 were 88.8% (95% CI: 75.5%-95.7%) and 86.0% (95% CI: 71.6%-93.9%) effective in preventing COVID-19-associated hospitalization. Both vaccines were 100% effective (95% CI<sub>BNT162b2</sub>: 51.4%-100%; 95% CI<sub>mRNA-1273</sub>: 43.3%-100%) in preventing COVID-19-associated ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are effective in a real-world setting and are associated with reduced rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection and decreased burden of COVID-19 on the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This study was funded by nference.</p>","PeriodicalId":272244,"journal":{"name":"Med (New York, N.y.)","volume":" ","pages":"979-992.e8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medj.2021.06.007","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FDA-authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective per real-world evidence synthesized across a multi-state health system.\",\"authors\":\"Colin Pawlowski,&nbsp;Patrick Lenehan,&nbsp;Arjun Puranik,&nbsp;Vineet Agarwal,&nbsp;A J Venkatakrishnan,&nbsp;Michiel J M Niesen,&nbsp;John C O'Horo,&nbsp;Abinash Virk,&nbsp;Melanie D Swift,&nbsp;Andrew D Badley,&nbsp;John Halamka,&nbsp;Venky Soundararajan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medj.2021.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-authorized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines, BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna), have demonstrated high efficacy in large phase 3 randomized clinical trials. It is important to assess their effectiveness in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of 136,532 individuals in the Mayo Clinic health system (Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) with PCR testing data between December 1, 2020 and April 20, 2021. We compared clinical outcomes for a vaccinated cohort of 68,266 individuals who received at least one dose of either vaccine (n<sub>BNT162b2</sub> = 51,795; n<sub>mRNA-1273</sub> = 16,471) and an unvaccinated control cohort of 68,266 individuals propensity matched based on relevant demographic, clinical, and geographic features. We estimated real-world vaccine effectiveness by comparing incidence rates of positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR testing and COVID-19-associated hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) admission starting 7 days after the second vaccine dose.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The real-world vaccine effectiveness of preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection was 86.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.4%-89.1%) for BNT162b2 and 93.3% (95% CI: 85.7%-97.4%) for mRNA-1273. BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 were 88.8% (95% CI: 75.5%-95.7%) and 86.0% (95% CI: 71.6%-93.9%) effective in preventing COVID-19-associated hospitalization. Both vaccines were 100% effective (95% CI<sub>BNT162b2</sub>: 51.4%-100%; 95% CI<sub>mRNA-1273</sub>: 43.3%-100%) in preventing COVID-19-associated ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are effective in a real-world setting and are associated with reduced rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection and decreased burden of COVID-19 on the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This study was funded by nference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":272244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Med (New York, N.y.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"979-992.e8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medj.2021.06.007\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Med (New York, N.y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2021.06.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Med (New York, N.y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2021.06.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的两种冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19) mRNA疫苗BNT162b2(辉瑞/BioNTech)和mRNA-1273 (Moderna)在大型3期随机临床试验中显示出很高的疗效。评估它们在现实世界中的有效性是很重要的。方法:对梅奥诊所卫生系统(亚利桑那州、佛罗里达州、爱荷华州、明尼苏达州和威斯康星州)的136532人进行回顾性分析,分析了2020年12月1日至2021年4月20日期间的PCR检测数据。我们比较了接种疫苗的68,266人的临床结果,这些人至少接种了一剂疫苗(nBNT162b2 = 51,795;nmRNA-1273 = 16,471)和未接种疫苗的68,266人的对照队列基于相关的人口学、临床和地理特征进行倾向匹配。我们通过比较严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR检测阳性的发生率和第二次疫苗剂量后7天开始的covid -19相关住院和重症监护病房(ICU)入院率,来估计真实世界疫苗的有效性。结果:实际疫苗预防SARS-CoV-2感染的有效性,BNT162b2为86.1%(95%可信区间[CI]: 82.4%-89.1%), mRNA-1273为93.3%(95%可信区间:85.7%-97.4%)。BNT162b2和mRNA-1273预防covid -19相关住院的有效率分别为88.8% (95% CI: 75.5% ~ 95.7%)和86.0% (95% CI: 71.6% ~ 93.9%)。两种疫苗均为100%有效(95% CIBNT162b2: 51.4%-100%;95% CImRNA-1273: 43.3%-100%)预防covid -19相关ICU住院。结论:BNT162b2和mRNA-1273在现实环境中是有效的,并且与降低SARS-CoV-2感染率和降低COVID-19对医疗系统的负担有关。经费:本研究由委员会资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

FDA-authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective per real-world evidence synthesized across a multi-state health system.

FDA-authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective per real-world evidence synthesized across a multi-state health system.

FDA-authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective per real-world evidence synthesized across a multi-state health system.

FDA-authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective per real-world evidence synthesized across a multi-state health system.

Background: Two US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-authorized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines, BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna), have demonstrated high efficacy in large phase 3 randomized clinical trials. It is important to assess their effectiveness in a real-world setting.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 136,532 individuals in the Mayo Clinic health system (Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) with PCR testing data between December 1, 2020 and April 20, 2021. We compared clinical outcomes for a vaccinated cohort of 68,266 individuals who received at least one dose of either vaccine (nBNT162b2 = 51,795; nmRNA-1273 = 16,471) and an unvaccinated control cohort of 68,266 individuals propensity matched based on relevant demographic, clinical, and geographic features. We estimated real-world vaccine effectiveness by comparing incidence rates of positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR testing and COVID-19-associated hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) admission starting 7 days after the second vaccine dose.

Findings: The real-world vaccine effectiveness of preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection was 86.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.4%-89.1%) for BNT162b2 and 93.3% (95% CI: 85.7%-97.4%) for mRNA-1273. BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 were 88.8% (95% CI: 75.5%-95.7%) and 86.0% (95% CI: 71.6%-93.9%) effective in preventing COVID-19-associated hospitalization. Both vaccines were 100% effective (95% CIBNT162b2: 51.4%-100%; 95% CImRNA-1273: 43.3%-100%) in preventing COVID-19-associated ICU admission.

Conclusions: BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are effective in a real-world setting and are associated with reduced rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection and decreased burden of COVID-19 on the healthcare system.

Funding: This study was funded by nference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信