耳科特定结果测量的发展:耳结果调查-16 (EOS-16)

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Juha T. Laakso , Juha Silvola , Timo Hirvonen , Samuli Suutarla , Ilkka Kivekäs , Riitta Saarinen , Lotta Haavisto , Jaakko Laitakari , Antti A. Aarnisalo , Aarno Dietz , Jussi Jero , Maija Hytönen , Saku T. Sinkkonen
{"title":"耳科特定结果测量的发展:耳结果调查-16 (EOS-16)","authors":"Juha T. Laakso ,&nbsp;Juha Silvola ,&nbsp;Timo Hirvonen ,&nbsp;Samuli Suutarla ,&nbsp;Ilkka Kivekäs ,&nbsp;Riitta Saarinen ,&nbsp;Lotta Haavisto ,&nbsp;Jaakko Laitakari ,&nbsp;Antti A. Aarnisalo ,&nbsp;Aarno Dietz ,&nbsp;Jussi Jero ,&nbsp;Maija Hytönen ,&nbsp;Saku T. Sinkkonen","doi":"10.1016/j.joto.2021.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>An important outcome measure of patient care is the impact on the patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Current ear-specific HRQoL instruments are designed for one diagnosis and emphasize different subdivisions such as symptoms, hearing problems, psychosocial impact, and the need for care. The optimal length of the recall period has not been studied. For these reasons, a new survey is needed that would cover most chronic ear diseases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A preliminary 24-item survey (EOS-24) was created. Untreated adult patients (included n = 186) with one of seven different chronic otologic conditions from all university hospitals in Finland were recruited to respond to EOS-24 and the 15D general HRQoL instrument. The recruiting otologists evaluated the severity of the disease and the disability caused by it. A control group was recruited. Based on the patients’ responses in different diagnosis groups, the items were reduced according to pre-defined criteria. The resulting survey was validated using a thorough statistical analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The relevance and necessity of the original 24 items were thoroughly investigated, leading to the exclusion of 8 items and the modification of 1. The remaining 16 items were well-balanced between subdivisions and were useful in all seven diagnosis groups, thus constituting the final instrument, EOS-16. The most suitable recall period was three months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>EOS-16 has been created according to the HRQoL survey guidelines with a versatile nationwide patient population. The survey has been validated and can be used for a wide range of chronic ear diseases as a HRQoL instrument.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.joto.2021.01.003","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of otology specific outcome measure: Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16)\",\"authors\":\"Juha T. Laakso ,&nbsp;Juha Silvola ,&nbsp;Timo Hirvonen ,&nbsp;Samuli Suutarla ,&nbsp;Ilkka Kivekäs ,&nbsp;Riitta Saarinen ,&nbsp;Lotta Haavisto ,&nbsp;Jaakko Laitakari ,&nbsp;Antti A. Aarnisalo ,&nbsp;Aarno Dietz ,&nbsp;Jussi Jero ,&nbsp;Maija Hytönen ,&nbsp;Saku T. Sinkkonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joto.2021.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>An important outcome measure of patient care is the impact on the patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Current ear-specific HRQoL instruments are designed for one diagnosis and emphasize different subdivisions such as symptoms, hearing problems, psychosocial impact, and the need for care. The optimal length of the recall period has not been studied. For these reasons, a new survey is needed that would cover most chronic ear diseases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A preliminary 24-item survey (EOS-24) was created. Untreated adult patients (included n = 186) with one of seven different chronic otologic conditions from all university hospitals in Finland were recruited to respond to EOS-24 and the 15D general HRQoL instrument. The recruiting otologists evaluated the severity of the disease and the disability caused by it. A control group was recruited. Based on the patients’ responses in different diagnosis groups, the items were reduced according to pre-defined criteria. The resulting survey was validated using a thorough statistical analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The relevance and necessity of the original 24 items were thoroughly investigated, leading to the exclusion of 8 items and the modification of 1. The remaining 16 items were well-balanced between subdivisions and were useful in all seven diagnosis groups, thus constituting the final instrument, EOS-16. The most suitable recall period was three months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>EOS-16 has been created according to the HRQoL survey guidelines with a versatile nationwide patient population. The survey has been validated and can be used for a wide range of chronic ear diseases as a HRQoL instrument.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.joto.2021.01.003\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293021000039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293021000039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的患者护理的一个重要结局指标是对患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。目前针对耳朵的HRQoL仪器是为一种诊断而设计的,并强调不同的细分,如症状、听力问题、社会心理影响和护理需求。回忆期的最佳长度尚未得到研究。由于这些原因,需要进行一项新的调查,以涵盖大多数慢性耳部疾病。方法编制24项初步调查问卷(EOS-24)。从芬兰所有大学医院招募了患有七种不同慢性耳科疾病之一的未经治疗的成年患者(纳入n = 186),对EOS-24和15D通用HRQoL仪器做出反应。招募的耳科医生评估了疾病的严重程度及其引起的残疾。招募了一个对照组。根据不同诊断组患者的反应,按照预先设定的标准减少项目。调查结果通过全面的统计分析得到了验证。结果对原24项的相关性和必要性进行了深入调查,排除了8项,修改了1项。其余16个项目在细分之间平衡良好,在所有7个诊断组中都很有用,因此构成了最终的工具EOS-16。最合适的召回期为3个月。结论seos -16是根据HRQoL调查指南编制的,具有全国范围内的多种患者群体。该调查已得到验证,可作为HRQoL工具用于广泛的慢性耳部疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development of otology specific outcome measure: Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16)

Development of otology specific outcome measure: Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16)

Development of otology specific outcome measure: Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16)

Development of otology specific outcome measure: Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16)

Purpose

An important outcome measure of patient care is the impact on the patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Current ear-specific HRQoL instruments are designed for one diagnosis and emphasize different subdivisions such as symptoms, hearing problems, psychosocial impact, and the need for care. The optimal length of the recall period has not been studied. For these reasons, a new survey is needed that would cover most chronic ear diseases.

Methods

A preliminary 24-item survey (EOS-24) was created. Untreated adult patients (included n = 186) with one of seven different chronic otologic conditions from all university hospitals in Finland were recruited to respond to EOS-24 and the 15D general HRQoL instrument. The recruiting otologists evaluated the severity of the disease and the disability caused by it. A control group was recruited. Based on the patients’ responses in different diagnosis groups, the items were reduced according to pre-defined criteria. The resulting survey was validated using a thorough statistical analysis.

Results

The relevance and necessity of the original 24 items were thoroughly investigated, leading to the exclusion of 8 items and the modification of 1. The remaining 16 items were well-balanced between subdivisions and were useful in all seven diagnosis groups, thus constituting the final instrument, EOS-16. The most suitable recall period was three months.

Conclusions

EOS-16 has been created according to the HRQoL survey guidelines with a versatile nationwide patient population. The survey has been validated and can be used for a wide range of chronic ear diseases as a HRQoL instrument.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Otology
Journal of Otology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
461
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Otology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to both clinical and basic science aspects of auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal welcomes submissions describing original experimental research that may improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying problems of basic or clinical significance and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines. Journal of Otology welcomes contributions from scholars in all countries and regions across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信