Leonel Briozzo, Giselle Tomasso, Stephanie Viroga, Hugo Selma, Virginia Cardozo, Clara Niz, Fernanda Nozar, Ana Bianchi
{"title":"covid-19大流行缓解措施对乌拉圭公立产科不利母胎环境的影响","authors":"Leonel Briozzo, Giselle Tomasso, Stephanie Viroga, Hugo Selma, Virginia Cardozo, Clara Niz, Fernanda Nozar, Ana Bianchi","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2021.1946791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The mitigation measures to face the health emergency due to the COVID 19 pandemic generated a deep economic, social, and psychological crisis at the community level. This effect is greater in the people, who are the most violated in their rights. In relation to the social crisis and gender perspective, women are particularly affected by the pandemic. Given the disadvantaged situation of women socially, economically, and politically, their self-care is diminished.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify whether there is an association between the classic risk factors for prematurity and fetal growth restriction and the increase in these pathologies in the period March-September 2020, in a maternity hospital that assists women from low resources.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study, with a comparative analysis of the periods between 15 March and 30 September 2019 and the same period in 2020. The data were obtained from an electronic clinical database. The prevalence of preterm birth and small-for-gestational age newborn was analyzed. Indicators available in the database that reflect maternal conditions that lead to an unfavorable maternal environment were selected and they were classified into categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the period of 2019, 3225 births were registered and in the period of 2020, 3036 births. In the 2019 period, 12.2% of prematurity was evidenced, while in the 2020 period, 14.5% (RR = 1.19, IC 95% = 1.05-1.35, <i>p</i> = .005). In relation to PEG 5.5% in the first period versus 6.9% in the second (RR = 1.26, CI 95% = 1.04-1.53, <i>p</i> = .01). No increases were found in the indicators that are traditionally related to the etiologies proposed to explain the increase in prematurity and small-for-age gestational, there was no evidence of an increase in inflammatory or vascular conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The economic, psychological and social crises, in the 1st semester of the health emergency, seriously affected the social determinants of the health of pregnant women who use the Public Maternity of reference in Uruguay. This situation is at the base of the poor perinatal results in the period of the maximum mediated mitigation of the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":520807,"journal":{"name":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","volume":" ","pages":"7312-7315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1946791","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the unfavorable maternal-fetal environment cause by mitigation measures of the covid-19 pandemic in the public maternity of reference of Uruguay.\",\"authors\":\"Leonel Briozzo, Giselle Tomasso, Stephanie Viroga, Hugo Selma, Virginia Cardozo, Clara Niz, Fernanda Nozar, Ana Bianchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2021.1946791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The mitigation measures to face the health emergency due to the COVID 19 pandemic generated a deep economic, social, and psychological crisis at the community level. This effect is greater in the people, who are the most violated in their rights. In relation to the social crisis and gender perspective, women are particularly affected by the pandemic. Given the disadvantaged situation of women socially, economically, and politically, their self-care is diminished.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify whether there is an association between the classic risk factors for prematurity and fetal growth restriction and the increase in these pathologies in the period March-September 2020, in a maternity hospital that assists women from low resources.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study, with a comparative analysis of the periods between 15 March and 30 September 2019 and the same period in 2020. The data were obtained from an electronic clinical database. The prevalence of preterm birth and small-for-gestational age newborn was analyzed. Indicators available in the database that reflect maternal conditions that lead to an unfavorable maternal environment were selected and they were classified into categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the period of 2019, 3225 births were registered and in the period of 2020, 3036 births. In the 2019 period, 12.2% of prematurity was evidenced, while in the 2020 period, 14.5% (RR = 1.19, IC 95% = 1.05-1.35, <i>p</i> = .005). In relation to PEG 5.5% in the first period versus 6.9% in the second (RR = 1.26, CI 95% = 1.04-1.53, <i>p</i> = .01). No increases were found in the indicators that are traditionally related to the etiologies proposed to explain the increase in prematurity and small-for-age gestational, there was no evidence of an increase in inflammatory or vascular conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The economic, psychological and social crises, in the 1st semester of the health emergency, seriously affected the social determinants of the health of pregnant women who use the Public Maternity of reference in Uruguay. This situation is at the base of the poor perinatal results in the period of the maximum mediated mitigation of the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7312-7315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1946791\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1946791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1946791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
导语:面对新冠肺炎疫情引发的突发卫生事件,应对措施在社区层面产生了深刻的经济、社会和心理危机。这种影响对那些权利受到最严重侵犯的人来说更大。在社会危机和性别观点方面,妇女尤其受到这一大流行病的影响。鉴于妇女在社会、经济和政治上的不利处境,她们的自我照顾减少了。目的:确定2020年3月至9月期间,在一家帮助低资源妇女的妇产医院,早产和胎儿生长受限的经典危险因素与这些病理的增加之间是否存在关联。材料和方法:回顾性研究,对2019年3月15日至9月30日与2020年同期进行比较分析。数据来源于电子临床数据库。分析早产儿和小胎龄新生儿的患病率。数据库中现有的反映导致不利孕产环境的孕产条件的指标被挑选出来并加以分类。结果:2019年登记出生3225人,2020年登记出生3036人。2019年期间早产率为12.2%,2020年期间为14.5% (RR = 1.19, IC 95% = 1.05 ~ 1.35, p = 0.005)。与PEG相比,第一期为5.5%,第二期为6.9% (RR = 1.26, CI 95% = 1.04-1.53, p = 0.01)。在传统上被认为与病因相关的指标中没有发现增加,这些指标被用来解释早产和小龄妊娠的增加,没有证据表明炎症或血管状况增加。结论:在卫生紧急情况的第一学期,经济、心理和社会危机严重影响了在乌拉圭公共产科就诊的孕妇健康的社会决定因素。这种情况是在最大限度地缓解该流行病期间围产期结果不佳的根本原因。
Effect of the unfavorable maternal-fetal environment cause by mitigation measures of the covid-19 pandemic in the public maternity of reference of Uruguay.
Introduction: The mitigation measures to face the health emergency due to the COVID 19 pandemic generated a deep economic, social, and psychological crisis at the community level. This effect is greater in the people, who are the most violated in their rights. In relation to the social crisis and gender perspective, women are particularly affected by the pandemic. Given the disadvantaged situation of women socially, economically, and politically, their self-care is diminished.
Objective: To identify whether there is an association between the classic risk factors for prematurity and fetal growth restriction and the increase in these pathologies in the period March-September 2020, in a maternity hospital that assists women from low resources.
Materials and methods: A retrospective study, with a comparative analysis of the periods between 15 March and 30 September 2019 and the same period in 2020. The data were obtained from an electronic clinical database. The prevalence of preterm birth and small-for-gestational age newborn was analyzed. Indicators available in the database that reflect maternal conditions that lead to an unfavorable maternal environment were selected and they were classified into categories.
Results: In the period of 2019, 3225 births were registered and in the period of 2020, 3036 births. In the 2019 period, 12.2% of prematurity was evidenced, while in the 2020 period, 14.5% (RR = 1.19, IC 95% = 1.05-1.35, p = .005). In relation to PEG 5.5% in the first period versus 6.9% in the second (RR = 1.26, CI 95% = 1.04-1.53, p = .01). No increases were found in the indicators that are traditionally related to the etiologies proposed to explain the increase in prematurity and small-for-age gestational, there was no evidence of an increase in inflammatory or vascular conditions.
Conclusion: The economic, psychological and social crises, in the 1st semester of the health emergency, seriously affected the social determinants of the health of pregnant women who use the Public Maternity of reference in Uruguay. This situation is at the base of the poor perinatal results in the period of the maximum mediated mitigation of the pandemic.