额外的周末和节假日物理治疗对老年髋部骨折患者有益吗?- 病例-历史对照研究。

Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-16 DOI:10.1142/S1013702521500104
Dennis Kim Chung Mo, Ken Kin Ming Lau, Donna Mei Yee Fung, Bosco Hon Ming Ma, Titanic Fuk On Lau, Sheung Wai Law
{"title":"额外的周末和节假日物理治疗对老年髋部骨折患者有益吗?- 病例-历史对照研究。","authors":"Dennis Kim Chung Mo, Ken Kin Ming Lau, Donna Mei Yee Fung, Bosco Hon Ming Ma, Titanic Fuk On Lau, Sheung Wai Law","doi":"10.1142/S1013702521500104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the new service model of additional weekend and holiday physiotherapy (PT) by comparing functional outcomes and hospital length of stay between a group of geriatric patients with hip fracture receiving daily PT training and a group of geriatric patients with hip fracture receiving weekdays PT training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-historical control chart review was conducted and a total of 355 patients were identified. Between-group comparisons were done on functional outcomes including Modified Functional Ambulation Classification (MFAC), Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and process outcome in terms of length of stay (LOS) in hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With similar characteristics, patients who received weekend and holiday PT training had a significant higher percentage of MFAC Category III and a significant lower percentage of MFAC Category II ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>015</mn></math> ) and significant higher MBI scores ( <math><mstyle><mtext>mean</mtext></mstyle> <mo>±</mo> <mstyle><mtext>standard</mtext></mstyle> </math> deviation, median; Study group: <math><mn>47</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>19</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>6</mn></math> points, 51 points; Control group: <math><mn>43</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>20</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0</mn></math> points, 43 points; <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>042</mn></math> ) upon admission to rehabilitation hospital. A similar trend in EMS scores (Study group: <math><mn>8</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>5</mn></math> points, 7 points; Control group: <math><mn>8</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>6</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>1</mn></math> points, 6 points; <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>998</mn></math> ) and MBI scores (Study group: <math><mn>63</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>23</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>4</mn></math> points, 68 points; Control group: <math><mn>61</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>26</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>1</mn></math> points, 64 points; <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>743</mn></math> ) were observed upon discharge from the rehabilitation hospital. The average LOS in acute hospitals remained static (Study group: <math><mn>7</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>7</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>9</mn></math> days, 7 days; Control group: <math><mn>7</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0</mn></math> days, 6 days; <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>192</mn></math> ). The average LOS in rehabilitation hospital (Study group: <math><mn>20</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>5</mn></math> days, 20 days; Control group: <math><mn>24</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>9</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>9</mn></math> days, 23 days; <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) and total in-patient LOS (Study group: <math><mn>26</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>7</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>6</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>4</mn></math> days, 26 days; Control group: <math><mn>30</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>7</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>11</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>2</mn></math> days, 28 days; <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) were significantly reduced. A higher percentage of days having PT training during hospitalization in rehabilitation hospital was shown with the implementation of new service (Study group: 89.1%; Control group: 65.9%, <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional weekend and holiday PT training in post-operative acute and rehabilitation hospitalization benefits geriatric patients with hip fracture in terms of improved training efficiency, where hospital LOS was shortened with more PT sessions, without any significant impacts on functional outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/91/dc/hkpj-41-109.PMC8221979.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does additional weekend and holiday physiotherapy benefit geriatric patients with hip fracture? - A case-historical control study.\",\"authors\":\"Dennis Kim Chung Mo, Ken Kin Ming Lau, Donna Mei Yee Fung, Bosco Hon Ming Ma, Titanic Fuk On Lau, Sheung Wai Law\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S1013702521500104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the new service model of additional weekend and holiday physiotherapy (PT) by comparing functional outcomes and hospital length of stay between a group of geriatric patients with hip fracture receiving daily PT training and a group of geriatric patients with hip fracture receiving weekdays PT training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-historical control chart review was conducted and a total of 355 patients were identified. Between-group comparisons were done on functional outcomes including Modified Functional Ambulation Classification (MFAC), Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and process outcome in terms of length of stay (LOS) in hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With similar characteristics, patients who received weekend and holiday PT training had a significant higher percentage of MFAC Category III and a significant lower percentage of MFAC Category II ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>015</mn></math> ) and significant higher MBI scores ( <math><mstyle><mtext>mean</mtext></mstyle> <mo>±</mo> <mstyle><mtext>standard</mtext></mstyle> </math> deviation, median; Study group: <math><mn>47</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>19</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>6</mn></math> points, 51 points; Control group: <math><mn>43</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>20</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0</mn></math> points, 43 points; <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>042</mn></math> ) upon admission to rehabilitation hospital. A similar trend in EMS scores (Study group: <math><mn>8</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>5</mn></math> points, 7 points; Control group: <math><mn>8</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>6</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>1</mn></math> points, 6 points; <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>998</mn></math> ) and MBI scores (Study group: <math><mn>63</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>23</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>4</mn></math> points, 68 points; Control group: <math><mn>61</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>26</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>1</mn></math> points, 64 points; <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>743</mn></math> ) were observed upon discharge from the rehabilitation hospital. The average LOS in acute hospitals remained static (Study group: <math><mn>7</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>7</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>9</mn></math> days, 7 days; Control group: <math><mn>7</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0</mn></math> days, 6 days; <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>192</mn></math> ). The average LOS in rehabilitation hospital (Study group: <math><mn>20</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>5</mn></math> days, 20 days; Control group: <math><mn>24</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>9</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>9</mn></math> days, 23 days; <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) and total in-patient LOS (Study group: <math><mn>26</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>7</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>6</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>4</mn></math> days, 26 days; Control group: <math><mn>30</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>7</mn> <mo>±</mo> <mn>11</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>2</mn></math> days, 28 days; <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ) were significantly reduced. A higher percentage of days having PT training during hospitalization in rehabilitation hospital was shown with the implementation of new service (Study group: 89.1%; Control group: 65.9%, <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>001</mn></math> ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional weekend and holiday PT training in post-operative acute and rehabilitation hospitalization benefits geriatric patients with hip fracture in terms of improved training efficiency, where hospital LOS was shortened with more PT sessions, without any significant impacts on functional outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/91/dc/hkpj-41-109.PMC8221979.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702521500104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702521500104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过比较一组每天接受物理治疗训练的老年髋部骨折患者和一组平日接受物理治疗训练的老年髋部骨折患者的功能结果和住院时间,评估周末和节假日额外物理治疗(PT)的新服务模式:方法:对病例历史对照病历进行了回顾性分析,共确定了 355 名患者。方法:对病例-历史对照病历进行了回顾性分析,共确定了 355 名患者,并对各组间的功能结果进行了比较,包括改良功能活动度分级(MFAC)、老年人活动度量表(EMS)、改良巴特尔指数(MBI)以及住院时间(LOS)等过程结果:在特征相似的情况下,接受周末和节假日康复训练的患者中,MFAC III 类患者的比例明显较高,MFAC II 类患者的比例明显较低 ( p = 0 . 015 ) ,MBI 评分也明显较高 ( 平均值 ± 标准差,中位数;研究组:47 :47 .4 ± 19 .6 分,对照组 51 分:43 .0 ± 20 .0 分,43 分;P = 0 .042 )。EMS 评分也呈类似趋势(研究组:8 :8 . 2 ± 5 .5 分,7 分;对照组:8 :8 .4 ± 6 .1 分,6 分;P = 0 . 998 )和 MBI 评分(研究组:63 :63 .0 ± 23 .4 分,68 分;对照组:61 :61 .2 ± 26 .1 分,64 分;P = 0 . 743 )。急性病医院的平均住院时间保持不变(研究组:7 :7 .7 ± 3 .9 天,7 天;对照组:7 :7 .4 ± 5 .0 天,6 天;P = 0 .192 ).康复医院的平均住院时间(研究组:20 .0 ± 5 .5 天,20 天;对照组:24 .3 ± 9 .9 天,23 天;P 0 .001 )和总住院时间(研究组:26 .7 ± 6 .4 天,26 天;对照组:30 :30 .7 ± 11 .2 天,28 天;P 0 .001 )明显减少。实施新服务后,康复医院住院期间接受康复训练的天数比例更高(研究组:89.1%;对照组:65.9%,P 0 :结论:髋部骨折老年患者在术后急性期和康复期住院期间接受额外的周末和节假日康复训练,有利于提高训练效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Does additional weekend and holiday physiotherapy benefit geriatric patients with hip fracture? - A case-historical control study.

Does additional weekend and holiday physiotherapy benefit geriatric patients with hip fracture? - A case-historical control study.

Does additional weekend and holiday physiotherapy benefit geriatric patients with hip fracture? - A case-historical control study.

分享
查看原文
Does additional weekend and holiday physiotherapy benefit geriatric patients with hip fracture? - A case-historical control study.

Objective: To evaluate the new service model of additional weekend and holiday physiotherapy (PT) by comparing functional outcomes and hospital length of stay between a group of geriatric patients with hip fracture receiving daily PT training and a group of geriatric patients with hip fracture receiving weekdays PT training.

Methods: A retrospective case-historical control chart review was conducted and a total of 355 patients were identified. Between-group comparisons were done on functional outcomes including Modified Functional Ambulation Classification (MFAC), Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and process outcome in terms of length of stay (LOS) in hospitals.

Results: With similar characteristics, patients who received weekend and holiday PT training had a significant higher percentage of MFAC Category III and a significant lower percentage of MFAC Category II ( p = 0 . 015 ) and significant higher MBI scores ( mean ± standard deviation, median; Study group: 47 . 4 ± 19 . 6 points, 51 points; Control group: 43 . 0 ± 20 . 0 points, 43 points; p = 0 . 042 ) upon admission to rehabilitation hospital. A similar trend in EMS scores (Study group: 8 . 2 ± 5 . 5 points, 7 points; Control group: 8 . 4 ± 6 . 1 points, 6 points; p = 0 . 998 ) and MBI scores (Study group: 63 . 0 ± 23 . 4 points, 68 points; Control group: 61 . 2 ± 26 . 1 points, 64 points; p = 0 . 743 ) were observed upon discharge from the rehabilitation hospital. The average LOS in acute hospitals remained static (Study group: 7 . 7 ± 3 . 9 days, 7 days; Control group: 7 . 4 ± 5 . 0 days, 6 days; p = 0 . 192 ). The average LOS in rehabilitation hospital (Study group: 20 . 0 ± 5 . 5 days, 20 days; Control group: 24 . 3 ± 9 . 9 days, 23 days; p < 0 . 001 ) and total in-patient LOS (Study group: 26 . 7 ± 6 . 4 days, 26 days; Control group: 30 . 7 ± 11 . 2 days, 28 days; p < 0 . 001 ) were significantly reduced. A higher percentage of days having PT training during hospitalization in rehabilitation hospital was shown with the implementation of new service (Study group: 89.1%; Control group: 65.9%, p < 0 . 001 ).

Conclusion: Additional weekend and holiday PT training in post-operative acute and rehabilitation hospitalization benefits geriatric patients with hip fracture in terms of improved training efficiency, where hospital LOS was shortened with more PT sessions, without any significant impacts on functional outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信