德国机器人辅助手术的现状——一项在线调查。

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Chirurg Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-25 DOI:10.1007/s00104-021-01404-x
C M Krüger, O Rückbeil, U Sebestyen, T Schlick, J Kürbis, H Riediger
{"title":"德国机器人辅助手术的现状——一项在线调查。","authors":"C M Krüger,&nbsp;O Rückbeil,&nbsp;U Sebestyen,&nbsp;T Schlick,&nbsp;J Kürbis,&nbsp;H Riediger","doi":"10.1007/s00104-021-01404-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic assistance has become established in surgery but is not yet a standard procedure. The current status of clinical dissemination in Germany remains unclear. Industry independent sources are scarce.</p><p><strong>Aim of the work: </strong>The aim of this survey was to investigate the current status of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) across specialties in Germany from 2014 to 2018.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An internet search was used to identify hospitals and departments (DP) with access to RAS. The DPs were asked to share their data from 2014-2018. In addition to clinical data, data on utilization, implementation, training, and funding were requested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of 31 December 2018 RAS was offered at 121 hospitals in Germany, 383 DPs with access to RAS were identified and 26% (n = 98) of DPs responded. On average each DP had two consultant surgeons, 10% of DPs had more than one RAS system and 100% of the RAS systems recorded were from Intuitive Surgical Inc., CA, USA. RAS was implemented in 65% in urology and in 12% in visceral surgery (VS). 21% of programs were interdisciplinary and 4% multidisciplinary (> 3). 83% of systems were purchased and 17% otherwise funded. For additional operating room costs, 74% of hospitals reported paying for them themselves. 14% chose pay as you go. Since 2014, procedures increased by a factor of 4 to approximately 8000. The proportion of VS increased by a factor of 5 since 2016.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RAS in Germany experienced strong growth through 2018. The range of procedures is similar to that of laparoscopy. With a current lack of reimbursement for the additional technical effort, RAS is predominantly used in the medium and high complexity range. The online survey is a good method to collect independent data without high administrative effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":50700,"journal":{"name":"Chirurg","volume":"92 12","pages":"1107-1113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00104-021-01404-x","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[DeRAS I-German situation of robotic-assisted surgery-an online survey].\",\"authors\":\"C M Krüger,&nbsp;O Rückbeil,&nbsp;U Sebestyen,&nbsp;T Schlick,&nbsp;J Kürbis,&nbsp;H Riediger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00104-021-01404-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic assistance has become established in surgery but is not yet a standard procedure. The current status of clinical dissemination in Germany remains unclear. Industry independent sources are scarce.</p><p><strong>Aim of the work: </strong>The aim of this survey was to investigate the current status of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) across specialties in Germany from 2014 to 2018.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An internet search was used to identify hospitals and departments (DP) with access to RAS. The DPs were asked to share their data from 2014-2018. In addition to clinical data, data on utilization, implementation, training, and funding were requested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of 31 December 2018 RAS was offered at 121 hospitals in Germany, 383 DPs with access to RAS were identified and 26% (n = 98) of DPs responded. On average each DP had two consultant surgeons, 10% of DPs had more than one RAS system and 100% of the RAS systems recorded were from Intuitive Surgical Inc., CA, USA. RAS was implemented in 65% in urology and in 12% in visceral surgery (VS). 21% of programs were interdisciplinary and 4% multidisciplinary (> 3). 83% of systems were purchased and 17% otherwise funded. For additional operating room costs, 74% of hospitals reported paying for them themselves. 14% chose pay as you go. Since 2014, procedures increased by a factor of 4 to approximately 8000. The proportion of VS increased by a factor of 5 since 2016.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RAS in Germany experienced strong growth through 2018. The range of procedures is similar to that of laparoscopy. With a current lack of reimbursement for the additional technical effort, RAS is predominantly used in the medium and high complexity range. The online survey is a good method to collect independent data without high administrative effort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurg\",\"volume\":\"92 12\",\"pages\":\"1107-1113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00104-021-01404-x\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurg\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-021-01404-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurg","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-021-01404-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:机器人辅助已经在外科手术中建立,但尚未成为标准程序。目前在德国的临床传播状况尚不清楚。行业独立的消息来源很少。工作目的:本调查的目的是调查2014年至2018年德国各专业机器人辅助手术(RAS)的现状。材料和方法:使用互联网搜索来确定可以访问RAS的医院和部门(DP)。他们被要求分享2014-2018年的数据。除了临床数据外,还要求提供关于利用、实施、培训和资金的数据。结果:截至2018年12月31日,德国121家医院提供RAS服务,确定了383名可获得RAS服务的住院医生,26% (n = 98)的住院医生做出了回应。平均每位DP有两名顾问外科医生,10%的DP有一个以上的RAS系统,100%的RAS系统记录来自Intuitive Surgical Inc., CA, USA。泌尿外科有65%、内脏外科有12%采用RAS。21%的项目是跨学科的,4%是多学科的(> 3)。83%的系统是购买的,17%是其他资金。对于额外的手术室费用,74%的医院报告自己支付。14%的人选择了现收现付。自2014年以来,手术数量增加了4倍,达到约8000例。自2016年以来,VS的比例增加了5倍。结论:德国RAS在2018年经历了强劲增长。手术的范围与腹腔镜相似。由于目前缺乏对额外技术工作的补偿,RAS主要用于中等和高复杂性范围。在线调查是一种收集独立数据的好方法,不需要大量的管理工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

[DeRAS I-German situation of robotic-assisted surgery-an online survey].

[DeRAS I-German situation of robotic-assisted surgery-an online survey].

[DeRAS I-German situation of robotic-assisted surgery-an online survey].

[DeRAS I-German situation of robotic-assisted surgery-an online survey].

Background: Robotic assistance has become established in surgery but is not yet a standard procedure. The current status of clinical dissemination in Germany remains unclear. Industry independent sources are scarce.

Aim of the work: The aim of this survey was to investigate the current status of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) across specialties in Germany from 2014 to 2018.

Material and methods: An internet search was used to identify hospitals and departments (DP) with access to RAS. The DPs were asked to share their data from 2014-2018. In addition to clinical data, data on utilization, implementation, training, and funding were requested.

Results: As of 31 December 2018 RAS was offered at 121 hospitals in Germany, 383 DPs with access to RAS were identified and 26% (n = 98) of DPs responded. On average each DP had two consultant surgeons, 10% of DPs had more than one RAS system and 100% of the RAS systems recorded were from Intuitive Surgical Inc., CA, USA. RAS was implemented in 65% in urology and in 12% in visceral surgery (VS). 21% of programs were interdisciplinary and 4% multidisciplinary (> 3). 83% of systems were purchased and 17% otherwise funded. For additional operating room costs, 74% of hospitals reported paying for them themselves. 14% chose pay as you go. Since 2014, procedures increased by a factor of 4 to approximately 8000. The proportion of VS increased by a factor of 5 since 2016.

Conclusion: RAS in Germany experienced strong growth through 2018. The range of procedures is similar to that of laparoscopy. With a current lack of reimbursement for the additional technical effort, RAS is predominantly used in the medium and high complexity range. The online survey is a good method to collect independent data without high administrative effort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chirurg
Chirurg 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen The magazine is intended for surgeons in hospitals, clinics and research. Each issue includes a comprehensive theme: Practical summaries access to selected topics and provide the reader with a compilation of current knowledge in all fields of surgery. Besides imparting relevant background knowledge, the emphasis is on the review of scientific results and practical experience. The reader will find concrete recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信