巴基斯坦开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省一家三级保健公立医院“2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行”期间的数字x线片排斥分析

Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-07 DOI:10.1007/s42058-021-00070-6
Amir Ali, Muhammad Yaseen
{"title":"巴基斯坦开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省一家三级保健公立医院“2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行”期间的数字x线片排斥分析","authors":"Amir Ali,&nbsp;Muhammad Yaseen","doi":"10.1007/s42058-021-00070-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of X-ray reject analysis is an important quality parameter in diagnostic facility. The aim of this study was to find out the radiograph rejection and its causes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemics as there was fear of coronavirus disease infection among the technical staff from the incoming patients in a busy, high volume public sector tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>This descriptive study was conducted at Radiology Department, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar from August to November, 2020. The rejected radiographs and their causes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15,000 X-ray procedures were conducted during study period out of which 2550 cases were repeated making the total rejection 17%. Rejection in male and female were 74.3 and 25.7%, respectively, while rejection in adults was (80.1%) and (19.9%) in pediatric age group of the total rejection. The main cause of rejection was positioning (30.5%) followed by artifacts (22.4%), motion (12.1%), improper collimation (10%), wrong labeling (8.4%), exposure errors (6.9%), detector errors (3.7%), machine faults (2.8%), re-request from referring physician (1.7%), and PACS issues (1.5%). In terms of body anatomical parts, the highest rejection was observed in extremities (44.1%), followed by chest radiography (23.3%), spine (11.4%), abdomen (6.4%), skull (5.9%), pelvis (4.7%), KUB (3.7%), and neck (0.6%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiograph rejection is common problem in every diagnostic facility but significant reduction can be achieved by implementing rejection analysis as basic quality indicator, and conducting technologist/s specific training programs for their knowledge and skill enhancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":10059,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology","volume":"4 2","pages":"133-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s42058-021-00070-6","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital radiograph rejection analysis during \\\"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic\\\" in a tertiary care public sector hospital in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Ali,&nbsp;Muhammad Yaseen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42058-021-00070-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of X-ray reject analysis is an important quality parameter in diagnostic facility. The aim of this study was to find out the radiograph rejection and its causes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemics as there was fear of coronavirus disease infection among the technical staff from the incoming patients in a busy, high volume public sector tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>This descriptive study was conducted at Radiology Department, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar from August to November, 2020. The rejected radiographs and their causes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15,000 X-ray procedures were conducted during study period out of which 2550 cases were repeated making the total rejection 17%. Rejection in male and female were 74.3 and 25.7%, respectively, while rejection in adults was (80.1%) and (19.9%) in pediatric age group of the total rejection. The main cause of rejection was positioning (30.5%) followed by artifacts (22.4%), motion (12.1%), improper collimation (10%), wrong labeling (8.4%), exposure errors (6.9%), detector errors (3.7%), machine faults (2.8%), re-request from referring physician (1.7%), and PACS issues (1.5%). In terms of body anatomical parts, the highest rejection was observed in extremities (44.1%), followed by chest radiography (23.3%), spine (11.4%), abdomen (6.4%), skull (5.9%), pelvis (4.7%), KUB (3.7%), and neck (0.6%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiograph rejection is common problem in every diagnostic facility but significant reduction can be achieved by implementing rejection analysis as basic quality indicator, and conducting technologist/s specific training programs for their knowledge and skill enhancement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"133-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s42058-021-00070-6\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42058-021-00070-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42058-021-00070-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:x射线废品率分析的评价是诊断设备中重要的质量参数。本研究的目的是找出2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的x线排斥反应及其原因,因为在一家繁忙的、大容量的公立三级医疗医院,技术人员害怕新来的患者感染冠状病毒病。材料和方法:本描述性研究于2020年8月至11月在白沙瓦雷丁夫人医院放射科进行。分析了拒收x线片的原因。结果:研究期间共进行了15,000次x线检查,其中2550例重复检查,总排异率为17%。男性和女性排斥反应分别为74.3%和25.7%,儿童年龄组成人排斥反应分别为80.1%和19.9%。拒收的主要原因是定位(30.5%),其次是伪影(22.4%)、运动(12.1%)、准直不当(10%)、标签错误(8.4%)、曝光错误(6.9%)、检测器错误(3.7%)、机器故障(2.8%)、转诊医师重新要求(1.7%)和PACS问题(1.5%)。从人体解剖部位来看,排异反应最高的部位是四肢(44.1%),其次是胸片(23.3%)、脊柱(11.4%)、腹部(6.4%)、颅骨(5.9%)、骨盆(4.7%)、KUB(3.7%)和颈部(0.6%)。结论:x线片拒收是各诊断机构常见的问题,但通过实施拒收分析作为基本质量指标,并对技术人员进行针对性培训,提高其知识和技能,可以显著减少拒收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Digital radiograph rejection analysis during "Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic" in a tertiary care public sector hospital in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan.

Digital radiograph rejection analysis during "Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic" in a tertiary care public sector hospital in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan.

Digital radiograph rejection analysis during "Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic" in a tertiary care public sector hospital in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan.

Digital radiograph rejection analysis during "Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic" in a tertiary care public sector hospital in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan.

Background: Evaluation of X-ray reject analysis is an important quality parameter in diagnostic facility. The aim of this study was to find out the radiograph rejection and its causes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemics as there was fear of coronavirus disease infection among the technical staff from the incoming patients in a busy, high volume public sector tertiary care hospital.

Materials and method: This descriptive study was conducted at Radiology Department, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar from August to November, 2020. The rejected radiographs and their causes were analyzed.

Results: A total of 15,000 X-ray procedures were conducted during study period out of which 2550 cases were repeated making the total rejection 17%. Rejection in male and female were 74.3 and 25.7%, respectively, while rejection in adults was (80.1%) and (19.9%) in pediatric age group of the total rejection. The main cause of rejection was positioning (30.5%) followed by artifacts (22.4%), motion (12.1%), improper collimation (10%), wrong labeling (8.4%), exposure errors (6.9%), detector errors (3.7%), machine faults (2.8%), re-request from referring physician (1.7%), and PACS issues (1.5%). In terms of body anatomical parts, the highest rejection was observed in extremities (44.1%), followed by chest radiography (23.3%), spine (11.4%), abdomen (6.4%), skull (5.9%), pelvis (4.7%), KUB (3.7%), and neck (0.6%), respectively.

Conclusion: Radiograph rejection is common problem in every diagnostic facility but significant reduction can be achieved by implementing rejection analysis as basic quality indicator, and conducting technologist/s specific training programs for their knowledge and skill enhancement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信