S.L. Hungerford , A.I. Adji , N.K. Bart , L. Lin , N. Song , A. Jabbour , M.F. O'Rourke , C.S. Hayward , D.W.M. Muller
{"title":"老化,高血压和主动脉瓣狭窄-了解使用心脏磁共振和压扁式血压计的系列电路","authors":"S.L. Hungerford , A.I. Adji , N.K. Bart , L. Lin , N. Song , A. Jabbour , M.F. O'Rourke , C.S. Hayward , D.W.M. Muller","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchy.2021.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Aortic stenosis (AS) is no longer considered to be a disease of fixed left ventricular (LV) afterload, but rather, functions as a series circuit, with important contributions from both the valve and vasculature. Patients with AS are typically elderly, with hypertension and a markedly remodelled aorta. The arterial component is sizeable, and yet, quantifying this to-date has been difficult to determine. We compared measurement of aortic pressure, flow and global LV load using a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)/applanation tonometry (AT) technique to uncouple ventriculo-arterial (VA) interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>20 healthy elderly patients and 20 with AS underwent a CMR/AT protocol. CMR provided LV volume and aortic flow simultaneously with AT pressure acquisition. Aortic pressure was derived by transformation of the AT waveform. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and global LV load were determined as the relationship of pressure to flow in the frequency domain. Values from both cohorts were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>AS patients were older (p < 0.01) albeit with no significant difference in brachial or central aortic pressure. SVR (14228 vs 19906 dyne s.cm<sup>−3</sup>; p = 0.02) and load (740 vs 946 dyne s.cm<sup>−3</sup>; p = 0.02) were higher in patients with AS, whilst aortic peak flow velocity was lower (38 vs 58 cm/s; p < 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Quantification of aortic pressure, flow velocity and global LV load using a simultaneous CMR/AT technique is able to demonstrate the progressive effects of hypertension and aortic stiffening with advanced age and valvular stenosis. This technique may help to better identify future patients at risk of VA coupling mismatch after correction of AS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36839,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100087"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijchy.2021.100087","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ageing, hypertension and aortic valve stenosis – Understanding the series circuit using cardiac magnetic resonance and applanation tonometry\",\"authors\":\"S.L. Hungerford , A.I. Adji , N.K. Bart , L. Lin , N. Song , A. Jabbour , M.F. O'Rourke , C.S. Hayward , D.W.M. Muller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijchy.2021.100087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Aortic stenosis (AS) is no longer considered to be a disease of fixed left ventricular (LV) afterload, but rather, functions as a series circuit, with important contributions from both the valve and vasculature. Patients with AS are typically elderly, with hypertension and a markedly remodelled aorta. The arterial component is sizeable, and yet, quantifying this to-date has been difficult to determine. We compared measurement of aortic pressure, flow and global LV load using a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)/applanation tonometry (AT) technique to uncouple ventriculo-arterial (VA) interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>20 healthy elderly patients and 20 with AS underwent a CMR/AT protocol. CMR provided LV volume and aortic flow simultaneously with AT pressure acquisition. Aortic pressure was derived by transformation of the AT waveform. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and global LV load were determined as the relationship of pressure to flow in the frequency domain. Values from both cohorts were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>AS patients were older (p < 0.01) albeit with no significant difference in brachial or central aortic pressure. SVR (14228 vs 19906 dyne s.cm<sup>−3</sup>; p = 0.02) and load (740 vs 946 dyne s.cm<sup>−3</sup>; p = 0.02) were higher in patients with AS, whilst aortic peak flow velocity was lower (38 vs 58 cm/s; p < 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Quantification of aortic pressure, flow velocity and global LV load using a simultaneous CMR/AT technique is able to demonstrate the progressive effects of hypertension and aortic stiffening with advanced age and valvular stenosis. This technique may help to better identify future patients at risk of VA coupling mismatch after correction of AS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijchy.2021.100087\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590086221000124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590086221000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
主动脉狭窄(daortic stenosis, AS)不再被认为是一种固定左心室(LV)后负荷疾病,而是一个串联回路,瓣膜和脉管系统都有重要贡献。AS患者通常为老年人,伴有高血压和主动脉明显重构。动脉成分是相当大的,然而,到目前为止,量化它还很难确定。我们比较了使用心脏磁共振(CMR)/压平血压计(AT)技术来解耦心室-动脉(VA)相互作用的主动脉压、血流和整体左室负荷的测量结果。方法20例健康老年人和20例AS患者采用CMR/AT方案。CMR同时提供左室容积和主动脉流量,同时获得AT压力。主动脉压由AT波形变换得到。系统血管阻力(SVR)和整体左室负荷在频域中被确定为压力与流量的关系。比较两个队列的值。结果as患者年龄较大(p <0.01),但肱动脉压和中央主动脉压无显著差异。SVR (14228 vs 19906);P = 0.02)和负载(740 vs 946 dyne s.cm−3;p = 0.02),而主动脉峰值血流速度较低(38 vs 58 cm/s;p & lt;0.01)。结论采用同步CMR/AT技术量化主动脉压力、血流速度和整体左室负荷能够显示高血压和主动脉硬化随高龄和瓣膜狭窄的进行性影响。这项技术可能有助于更好地识别AS矫正后存在VA偶联不匹配风险的患者。
Ageing, hypertension and aortic valve stenosis – Understanding the series circuit using cardiac magnetic resonance and applanation tonometry
Background
Aortic stenosis (AS) is no longer considered to be a disease of fixed left ventricular (LV) afterload, but rather, functions as a series circuit, with important contributions from both the valve and vasculature. Patients with AS are typically elderly, with hypertension and a markedly remodelled aorta. The arterial component is sizeable, and yet, quantifying this to-date has been difficult to determine. We compared measurement of aortic pressure, flow and global LV load using a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)/applanation tonometry (AT) technique to uncouple ventriculo-arterial (VA) interactions.
Methods
20 healthy elderly patients and 20 with AS underwent a CMR/AT protocol. CMR provided LV volume and aortic flow simultaneously with AT pressure acquisition. Aortic pressure was derived by transformation of the AT waveform. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and global LV load were determined as the relationship of pressure to flow in the frequency domain. Values from both cohorts were compared.
Results
AS patients were older (p < 0.01) albeit with no significant difference in brachial or central aortic pressure. SVR (14228 vs 19906 dyne s.cm−3; p = 0.02) and load (740 vs 946 dyne s.cm−3; p = 0.02) were higher in patients with AS, whilst aortic peak flow velocity was lower (38 vs 58 cm/s; p < 0.01).
Conclusions
Quantification of aortic pressure, flow velocity and global LV load using a simultaneous CMR/AT technique is able to demonstrate the progressive effects of hypertension and aortic stiffening with advanced age and valvular stenosis. This technique may help to better identify future patients at risk of VA coupling mismatch after correction of AS.