{"title":"溃疡性结肠炎相关瘤样病变的内镜下粘膜下解剖的实际经验。","authors":"Akira Matsui, Shu Hoteya, Junnosuke Hayasaka, Satoshi Yamashita, Yorinari Ochiai, Yugo Suzuki, Yumiko Fukuma, Takayuki Okamura, Yutaka Mitsunaga, Masami Tanaka, Kousuke Nomura, Nobuhiro Dan, Hiroyuki Odagiri, Daisuke Kikuchi","doi":"10.1159/000512292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Some studies have recently investigated endoscopic resection of UC-associated neoplasia (UCAN), but the indications for endoscopic resection of UCAN remain controversial. This study sought to clarify the problems encountered in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for UCAN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen lesions in 12 patients with UCAN (UCAN group) and 913 epithelial lesions in 824 control patients without UC (non-UC group) were evaluated. Both groups underwent ESD between January 2010 and December 2017 at Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Treatment outcomes of the 2 groups were compared retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariate analysis showed that the mean tumor size was significantly smaller in the UCAN group than in the non-UC group (25.1 ± 26.7 mm vs. 31.9 ± 19.0; <i>p</i> = 0.0023); however, the R0 resection rate was significantly lower in the UCAN group (70.6 vs. 92.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a significantly lower negative horizontal margin rate in the UCAN group (odds ratio 11.3, 95% confidence interval 3.588-34.525; <i>p</i> = 0.000).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>ESD for UCAN is associated with a low-negative horizontal margin rate. When performing ESD for UCAN, it is important to evaluate the accuracy of the UCAN demarcation line, especially for flat lesions, using white-light imaging and chromoendoscopy as well as other modalities, including biopsy of surrounding tissues.</p>","PeriodicalId":13605,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases","volume":"6 2","pages":"70-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000512292","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Experience of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Ulcerative Colitis-Associated Neoplasia.\",\"authors\":\"Akira Matsui, Shu Hoteya, Junnosuke Hayasaka, Satoshi Yamashita, Yorinari Ochiai, Yugo Suzuki, Yumiko Fukuma, Takayuki Okamura, Yutaka Mitsunaga, Masami Tanaka, Kousuke Nomura, Nobuhiro Dan, Hiroyuki Odagiri, Daisuke Kikuchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000512292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Some studies have recently investigated endoscopic resection of UC-associated neoplasia (UCAN), but the indications for endoscopic resection of UCAN remain controversial. This study sought to clarify the problems encountered in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for UCAN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen lesions in 12 patients with UCAN (UCAN group) and 913 epithelial lesions in 824 control patients without UC (non-UC group) were evaluated. Both groups underwent ESD between January 2010 and December 2017 at Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Treatment outcomes of the 2 groups were compared retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariate analysis showed that the mean tumor size was significantly smaller in the UCAN group than in the non-UC group (25.1 ± 26.7 mm vs. 31.9 ± 19.0; <i>p</i> = 0.0023); however, the R0 resection rate was significantly lower in the UCAN group (70.6 vs. 92.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a significantly lower negative horizontal margin rate in the UCAN group (odds ratio 11.3, 95% confidence interval 3.588-34.525; <i>p</i> = 0.000).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>ESD for UCAN is associated with a low-negative horizontal margin rate. When performing ESD for UCAN, it is important to evaluate the accuracy of the UCAN demarcation line, especially for flat lesions, using white-light imaging and chromoendoscopy as well as other modalities, including biopsy of surrounding tissues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"70-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000512292\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000512292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000512292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者患结直肠癌的风险增加。最近有一些研究探讨了内镜下uc相关肿瘤(UCAN)的切除术,但内镜下UCAN切除术的适应症仍存在争议。本研究旨在澄清内镜下粘膜下剥离(ESD)治疗UCAN时遇到的问题。方法:对12例UCAN患者的17个病变(UCAN组)和824例非UC患者的913个上皮病变(非UC组)进行评估。两组患者均于2010年1月至2017年12月在日本东京Toranomon医院接受ESD治疗。回顾性比较两组治疗结果。结果:单因素分析显示,UCAN组的平均肿瘤大小明显小于非uc组(25.1±26.7 mm vs. 31.9±19.0;P = 0.0023);然而,UCAN组的R0切除率明显较低(70.6 vs 92.9%;P = 0.001)。多因素分析显示,UCAN组的负水平边际率显著低于对照组(优势比11.3,95%可信区间3.588-34.525;P = 0.000)。讨论/结论:UCAN的ESD与低负水平切缘率相关。当对UCAN进行ESD时,评估UCAN分界线的准确性是很重要的,特别是对于扁平病变,使用白光成像和色内窥镜以及其他方式,包括周围组织活检。
Real-World Experience of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Ulcerative Colitis-Associated Neoplasia.
Introduction: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Some studies have recently investigated endoscopic resection of UC-associated neoplasia (UCAN), but the indications for endoscopic resection of UCAN remain controversial. This study sought to clarify the problems encountered in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for UCAN.
Methods: Seventeen lesions in 12 patients with UCAN (UCAN group) and 913 epithelial lesions in 824 control patients without UC (non-UC group) were evaluated. Both groups underwent ESD between January 2010 and December 2017 at Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Treatment outcomes of the 2 groups were compared retrospectively.
Results: Univariate analysis showed that the mean tumor size was significantly smaller in the UCAN group than in the non-UC group (25.1 ± 26.7 mm vs. 31.9 ± 19.0; p = 0.0023); however, the R0 resection rate was significantly lower in the UCAN group (70.6 vs. 92.9%; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a significantly lower negative horizontal margin rate in the UCAN group (odds ratio 11.3, 95% confidence interval 3.588-34.525; p = 0.000).
Discussion/conclusion: ESD for UCAN is associated with a low-negative horizontal margin rate. When performing ESD for UCAN, it is important to evaluate the accuracy of the UCAN demarcation line, especially for flat lesions, using white-light imaging and chromoendoscopy as well as other modalities, including biopsy of surrounding tissues.