阿片类药物成瘾药物辅助治疗方案的比较:文献综述。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Amanda Spayde-Baker, Jennifer Patek
{"title":"阿片类药物成瘾药物辅助治疗方案的比较:文献综述。","authors":"Amanda Spayde-Baker, Jennifer Patek","doi":"10.1097/JAN.0000000000000392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In individuals in the United States with opioid addiction, what is the effect of a medication-assisted treatment (MAT) in reducing the relapse and harm reduction when comparing the use of buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone? In 2017, it was estimated that 1.7 million individuals suffer from overuse of prescription opiates, 652,000 individuals suffer from heroin use disorder, and greater than 130 individuals die from opiate overdose daily (National Institutes of Health, 2019). Using a systematic literature review, the following results were found. Buprenorphine is currently the second most effective MAT in harm reduction and relapse prevention, can be initiated and maintained through primary care, has a low risk for overdose, but needs to be started only when moderate withdrawals have begun. Methadone is currently the gold standard in MAT and can be started in any stage of withdrawal; however, titrating to effective dose is a lengthy process, and it must be administered at a specialty clinic. Naltrexone in oral form has not been shown to be effective because of lack of adherence; however, the extended-release intramuscular injection form has been shown to reduce relapse and increase the quality of life before initiation individuals must be opioid free for 7-14 days. Choosing the proper MAT is highly individualized. It is recommended that more research be conducted in comparing all MAT options, looking at the quality of life on each MAT, researching motivations to stay on MAT and remain opioid free, and looking at the impact of external reward on adherence to the MAT program.</p>","PeriodicalId":54892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictions Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"E189-E194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Medication-Assisted Treatment Options for Opioid Addiction: A Review of the Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Spayde-Baker, Jennifer Patek\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JAN.0000000000000392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In individuals in the United States with opioid addiction, what is the effect of a medication-assisted treatment (MAT) in reducing the relapse and harm reduction when comparing the use of buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone? In 2017, it was estimated that 1.7 million individuals suffer from overuse of prescription opiates, 652,000 individuals suffer from heroin use disorder, and greater than 130 individuals die from opiate overdose daily (National Institutes of Health, 2019). Using a systematic literature review, the following results were found. Buprenorphine is currently the second most effective MAT in harm reduction and relapse prevention, can be initiated and maintained through primary care, has a low risk for overdose, but needs to be started only when moderate withdrawals have begun. Methadone is currently the gold standard in MAT and can be started in any stage of withdrawal; however, titrating to effective dose is a lengthy process, and it must be administered at a specialty clinic. Naltrexone in oral form has not been shown to be effective because of lack of adherence; however, the extended-release intramuscular injection form has been shown to reduce relapse and increase the quality of life before initiation individuals must be opioid free for 7-14 days. Choosing the proper MAT is highly individualized. It is recommended that more research be conducted in comparing all MAT options, looking at the quality of life on each MAT, researching motivations to stay on MAT and remain opioid free, and looking at the impact of external reward on adherence to the MAT program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Addictions Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E189-E194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Addictions Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000392\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictions Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:在美国阿片类药物成瘾个体中,与丁丙诺啡、美沙酮和纳曲酮的使用相比,药物辅助治疗(MAT)在减少复发和减少危害方面的效果如何?2017年,估计有170万人过度使用处方阿片类药物,65.2万人患有海洛因使用障碍,每天有130多人死于阿片类药物过量(美国国立卫生研究院,2019年)。通过系统的文献回顾,发现以下结果。丁丙诺啡是目前在减少危害和预防复发方面第二有效的MAT,可通过初级保健开始并维持,过量风险低,但只有在开始适度停药时才需要开始。美沙酮目前是MAT的金标准,可以在停药的任何阶段开始使用;然而,滴定到有效剂量是一个漫长的过程,必须在专业诊所进行。口服纳曲酮没有被证明是有效的,因为缺乏依从性;然而,肌内注射缓释形式已被证明可以减少复发并提高生活质量,在开始之前,个体必须在7-14天内不使用阿片类药物。选择合适的MAT是高度个性化的。建议进行更多的研究来比较所有MAT选项,查看每个MAT的生活质量,研究继续使用MAT和保持无阿片类药物的动机,并查看外部奖励对遵守MAT计划的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Medication-Assisted Treatment Options for Opioid Addiction: A Review of the Literature.

Abstract: In individuals in the United States with opioid addiction, what is the effect of a medication-assisted treatment (MAT) in reducing the relapse and harm reduction when comparing the use of buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone? In 2017, it was estimated that 1.7 million individuals suffer from overuse of prescription opiates, 652,000 individuals suffer from heroin use disorder, and greater than 130 individuals die from opiate overdose daily (National Institutes of Health, 2019). Using a systematic literature review, the following results were found. Buprenorphine is currently the second most effective MAT in harm reduction and relapse prevention, can be initiated and maintained through primary care, has a low risk for overdose, but needs to be started only when moderate withdrawals have begun. Methadone is currently the gold standard in MAT and can be started in any stage of withdrawal; however, titrating to effective dose is a lengthy process, and it must be administered at a specialty clinic. Naltrexone in oral form has not been shown to be effective because of lack of adherence; however, the extended-release intramuscular injection form has been shown to reduce relapse and increase the quality of life before initiation individuals must be opioid free for 7-14 days. Choosing the proper MAT is highly individualized. It is recommended that more research be conducted in comparing all MAT options, looking at the quality of life on each MAT, researching motivations to stay on MAT and remain opioid free, and looking at the impact of external reward on adherence to the MAT program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Addictions Nursing (JAN) – JAN is the official journal of IntNSA and is a peer-reviewed quarterly international journal publishing original articles on current research issues, practices and innovations as they related to the field of addictions. Submissions are solicited from professional nurses and other health-care professionals engaged in treatment, prevention, education, research and consultation. Each issue of the Journal of Addictions Nursing contains original full-length papers as well as several regular features sections: · Perspectives features points of view and commentaries on relevant issues · Media Watch provides summaries and critiques of print and digital resources. · Innovative Roles examines unique roles that nurses in addictions are implementing · Research Reviews offers summaries and critiques of research studies in the field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信