使用中位数与平均值计算乳腺癌ERBB2 FISH结果的影响

Cancer medicine journal Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-15
Jie Song, Alexander Yu, Diana Munoz, Song Han, Manjunath Nimmakayalu, Peter C Hu, Jianli Dong
{"title":"使用中位数与平均值计算乳腺癌ERBB2 FISH结果的影响","authors":"Jie Song,&nbsp;Alexander Yu,&nbsp;Diana Munoz,&nbsp;Song Han,&nbsp;Manjunath Nimmakayalu,&nbsp;Peter C Hu,&nbsp;Jianli Dong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) testing is used to measure the status of ERBB2 gene expression and DNA amplification. Test results have been reported with a discrepancy as high as 20%. The purpose of this study was to improve ERBB2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) sensitivity by evaluating results generated by median as well as mean calculations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified breast cancer cases at our institution in which ERBB2 FISH testing was performed in-house from June 2018 to May 2020. FISH results were classified using the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines: groups 1 and 5 are FISH positive and negative, respectively, and groups 2-4 are equivocal requiring additional work-up. FISH counting sheets were collected and regrouped by median ERBB2 copy number counts and median ERBB2/CEP17 ratio and compared with the mean ERBB2 and mean ERBB2/CEP17 ratio. Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and CEP17 copy number gain (CEP17 ≥3) were assessed to see if they affect the discrepancy between median and mean groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two breast cancer cases were collected and evaluated. Eleven cases (11 of 72 [15%]) had discrepant grouping by mean and median calculations. A significant number of discrepancies were found for CEP17 copy number gain (p = 0.027) but not for ERBB2 (p = 0.411), the ERBB2/CEP17 ratio (p = 0.445), FISH results (p = 0.194), or genetic heterogeneity (p = 0.465). Among the four cases regrouped to median group 1, 2 were from mean group 3 and underwent anti-ERBB2 targeted therapy and 2 were from mean groups 4 and 5 may have benefitted from targeted therapy with more than 30% amplified cells. The median may be better to reflect the monosomy subclone within tumor tissues for the case 387 moved from mean group 5 to median group 2. The 6 cases moved from mean group 5 to median group 4 with CEP17 copy number gain may have had a poor prognosis based on other study result.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Including the median calculation may increase ERBB2 sensitivity and identification of CEP17 copy number gain. Further clinical studies are necessary to examine the outcome of including median in calculating ERBB2/CEP17 values.</p>","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8171267/pdf/nihms-1695277.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Using Median vs. Mean in Calculating ERBB2 FISH Results in Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jie Song,&nbsp;Alexander Yu,&nbsp;Diana Munoz,&nbsp;Song Han,&nbsp;Manjunath Nimmakayalu,&nbsp;Peter C Hu,&nbsp;Jianli Dong\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) testing is used to measure the status of ERBB2 gene expression and DNA amplification. Test results have been reported with a discrepancy as high as 20%. The purpose of this study was to improve ERBB2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) sensitivity by evaluating results generated by median as well as mean calculations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified breast cancer cases at our institution in which ERBB2 FISH testing was performed in-house from June 2018 to May 2020. FISH results were classified using the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines: groups 1 and 5 are FISH positive and negative, respectively, and groups 2-4 are equivocal requiring additional work-up. FISH counting sheets were collected and regrouped by median ERBB2 copy number counts and median ERBB2/CEP17 ratio and compared with the mean ERBB2 and mean ERBB2/CEP17 ratio. Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and CEP17 copy number gain (CEP17 ≥3) were assessed to see if they affect the discrepancy between median and mean groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two breast cancer cases were collected and evaluated. Eleven cases (11 of 72 [15%]) had discrepant grouping by mean and median calculations. A significant number of discrepancies were found for CEP17 copy number gain (p = 0.027) but not for ERBB2 (p = 0.411), the ERBB2/CEP17 ratio (p = 0.445), FISH results (p = 0.194), or genetic heterogeneity (p = 0.465). Among the four cases regrouped to median group 1, 2 were from mean group 3 and underwent anti-ERBB2 targeted therapy and 2 were from mean groups 4 and 5 may have benefitted from targeted therapy with more than 30% amplified cells. The median may be better to reflect the monosomy subclone within tumor tissues for the case 387 moved from mean group 5 to median group 2. The 6 cases moved from mean group 5 to median group 4 with CEP17 copy number gain may have had a poor prognosis based on other study result.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Including the median calculation may increase ERBB2 sensitivity and identification of CEP17 copy number gain. Further clinical studies are necessary to examine the outcome of including median in calculating ERBB2/CEP17 values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer medicine journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8171267/pdf/nihms-1695277.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer medicine journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Erb-b2受体酪氨酸激酶2 (ERBB2)检测用于检测ERBB2基因表达和DNA扩增情况。报告的测试结果差异高达20%。本研究的目的是通过评估中位数和平均值计算产生的结果来提高ERBB2荧光原位杂交(FISH)的灵敏度。方法:我们回顾性地确定了2018年6月至2020年5月在我们机构内部进行ERBB2 FISH检测的乳腺癌病例。FISH结果根据2018年美国临床肿瘤学会/美国病理学家学会指南进行分类:第1组和第5组分别为FISH阳性和阴性,第2-4组模棱两可,需要额外的检查。收集FISH计数片,按ERBB2拷贝数中位数和ERBB2/CEP17中位数比率重新分组,并与ERBB2平均值和ERBB2/CEP17平均值进行比较。评估肿瘤内遗传异质性和CEP17拷贝数增益(CEP17≥3)是否影响中位数组和平均值组之间的差异。结果:收集并评价72例乳腺癌病例。11例(72例中的11例[15%])通过均值和中位数计算存在差异分组。在CEP17拷贝数增益(p = 0.027)方面存在显著差异,但在ERBB2 (p = 0.411)、ERBB2/CEP17比值(p = 0.445)、FISH结果(p = 0.194)或遗传异质性(p = 0.465)方面没有显著差异。在重新分组为中位组1的4例患者中,2例来自平均组3并接受了抗erbb2靶向治疗,2例来自平均组4和5可能受益于靶向治疗,扩增细胞超过30%。中位数可能更好地反映肿瘤组织内的单体亚克隆,因为病例387从平均组5转移到中位数组2。从CEP17拷贝数增加的6例从平均组5转移到中位数组4,从其他研究结果来看,可能预后较差。结论:加入中位数计算可提高ERBB2的敏感性和CEP17拷贝数的识别增益。需要进一步的临床研究来检验计算ERBB2/CEP17值时纳入中位数的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of Using Median vs. Mean in Calculating ERBB2 FISH Results in Breast Cancer.

Impact of Using Median vs. Mean in Calculating ERBB2 FISH Results in Breast Cancer.

Introduction: Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) testing is used to measure the status of ERBB2 gene expression and DNA amplification. Test results have been reported with a discrepancy as high as 20%. The purpose of this study was to improve ERBB2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) sensitivity by evaluating results generated by median as well as mean calculations.

Methods: We retrospectively identified breast cancer cases at our institution in which ERBB2 FISH testing was performed in-house from June 2018 to May 2020. FISH results were classified using the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines: groups 1 and 5 are FISH positive and negative, respectively, and groups 2-4 are equivocal requiring additional work-up. FISH counting sheets were collected and regrouped by median ERBB2 copy number counts and median ERBB2/CEP17 ratio and compared with the mean ERBB2 and mean ERBB2/CEP17 ratio. Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and CEP17 copy number gain (CEP17 ≥3) were assessed to see if they affect the discrepancy between median and mean groups.

Results: Seventy-two breast cancer cases were collected and evaluated. Eleven cases (11 of 72 [15%]) had discrepant grouping by mean and median calculations. A significant number of discrepancies were found for CEP17 copy number gain (p = 0.027) but not for ERBB2 (p = 0.411), the ERBB2/CEP17 ratio (p = 0.445), FISH results (p = 0.194), or genetic heterogeneity (p = 0.465). Among the four cases regrouped to median group 1, 2 were from mean group 3 and underwent anti-ERBB2 targeted therapy and 2 were from mean groups 4 and 5 may have benefitted from targeted therapy with more than 30% amplified cells. The median may be better to reflect the monosomy subclone within tumor tissues for the case 387 moved from mean group 5 to median group 2. The 6 cases moved from mean group 5 to median group 4 with CEP17 copy number gain may have had a poor prognosis based on other study result.

Conclusion: Including the median calculation may increase ERBB2 sensitivity and identification of CEP17 copy number gain. Further clinical studies are necessary to examine the outcome of including median in calculating ERBB2/CEP17 values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信