[金融行业压力检查项目中压力调查反应态度的相关因素]。

Q3 Medicine
Kosuke Kawamura, Aya Shimada, Ikuharu Morioka
{"title":"[金融行业压力检查项目中压力调查反应态度的相关因素]。","authors":"Kosuke Kawamura,&nbsp;Aya Shimada,&nbsp;Ikuharu Morioka","doi":"10.1265/jjh.20011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to clarify the factors related to attitudes toward responses to a stress survey in the Stress Check Program, which is used to screen for workers with high psychosocial stress at the workplace.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted on 1,800 regular staff member of a financial industry (valid response rate: 72.0%). The questionnaire items were the brief job stress questionnaire (BJSQ), the sense of coherence (SOC-13), the Japanese version of the Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES-J), attitudes toward responses to the stress survey, and the concerns of subjects regarding the stress check program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stress in interpersonal relationships at the workplace in the BJSQ, \"concerns about leaking results to the company\", \"concerns about receiving persistent calls for an interview\", and \"concerns about a disadvantageous treatment by the company\" were positively related to 'writing general truths', whereas the support from the boss in the BJSQ and the subscales of SOC-13 were negatively related to 'writing general truths'. The stress in interpersonal relationships at the workplace and \"concerns about receiving persistent calls for an interview\" were positively related to 'writing falsehoods', but the \"dedication\" in UWES-J was negatively related to 'writing falsehoods'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To obtain authentic answers in the stress survey, it is important (1) to smooth relationships at the workplace, (2) to devise operation systems such as an interview guidance, and (3) to provide support that enhances the ability of workers to cope with stress and work engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":35643,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Factors Related to Attitudes toward Responses to Stress Survey in Stress Check Program in Financial Industry].\",\"authors\":\"Kosuke Kawamura,&nbsp;Aya Shimada,&nbsp;Ikuharu Morioka\",\"doi\":\"10.1265/jjh.20011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to clarify the factors related to attitudes toward responses to a stress survey in the Stress Check Program, which is used to screen for workers with high psychosocial stress at the workplace.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted on 1,800 regular staff member of a financial industry (valid response rate: 72.0%). The questionnaire items were the brief job stress questionnaire (BJSQ), the sense of coherence (SOC-13), the Japanese version of the Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES-J), attitudes toward responses to the stress survey, and the concerns of subjects regarding the stress check program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stress in interpersonal relationships at the workplace in the BJSQ, \\\"concerns about leaking results to the company\\\", \\\"concerns about receiving persistent calls for an interview\\\", and \\\"concerns about a disadvantageous treatment by the company\\\" were positively related to 'writing general truths', whereas the support from the boss in the BJSQ and the subscales of SOC-13 were negatively related to 'writing general truths'. The stress in interpersonal relationships at the workplace and \\\"concerns about receiving persistent calls for an interview\\\" were positively related to 'writing falsehoods', but the \\\"dedication\\\" in UWES-J was negatively related to 'writing falsehoods'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To obtain authentic answers in the stress survey, it is important (1) to smooth relationships at the workplace, (2) to devise operation systems such as an interview guidance, and (3) to provide support that enhances the ability of workers to cope with stress and work engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Hygiene\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1265/jjh.20011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1265/jjh.20011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是阐明压力检查计划中对压力调查反应态度的相关因素,该计划用于筛选工作场所高心理社会压力的工人。方法:对某金融行业1800名正式工作人员进行匿名问卷调查,有效回复率为72.0%。问卷项目包括简要工作压力问卷(BJSQ)、连贯性感问卷(SOC-13)、日文版乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-J)、对压力调查反应的态度以及被试对压力检查程序的关注。结果:在BJSQ中,职场人际关系压力、“担心向公司泄露结果”、“担心不断接到面试电话”和“担心受到公司不利待遇”与“写一般事实”呈正相关,而在BJSQ和SOC-13量表中,老板的支持与“写一般事实”呈负相关。职场人际关系压力和“担心不断接到面试电话”与“写假话”呈正相关,而UWES-J中的“奉献精神”与“写假话”呈负相关。结论:为了在压力调查中获得真实的答案,重要的是:(1)疏通职场关系,(2)设计面试指导等操作系统,(3)提供支持,提高员工应对压力和工作投入的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Factors Related to Attitudes toward Responses to Stress Survey in Stress Check Program in Financial Industry].

Objective: The purpose of this study is to clarify the factors related to attitudes toward responses to a stress survey in the Stress Check Program, which is used to screen for workers with high psychosocial stress at the workplace.

Methods: An anonymous self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted on 1,800 regular staff member of a financial industry (valid response rate: 72.0%). The questionnaire items were the brief job stress questionnaire (BJSQ), the sense of coherence (SOC-13), the Japanese version of the Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES-J), attitudes toward responses to the stress survey, and the concerns of subjects regarding the stress check program.

Results: The stress in interpersonal relationships at the workplace in the BJSQ, "concerns about leaking results to the company", "concerns about receiving persistent calls for an interview", and "concerns about a disadvantageous treatment by the company" were positively related to 'writing general truths', whereas the support from the boss in the BJSQ and the subscales of SOC-13 were negatively related to 'writing general truths'. The stress in interpersonal relationships at the workplace and "concerns about receiving persistent calls for an interview" were positively related to 'writing falsehoods', but the "dedication" in UWES-J was negatively related to 'writing falsehoods'.

Conclusions: To obtain authentic answers in the stress survey, it is important (1) to smooth relationships at the workplace, (2) to devise operation systems such as an interview guidance, and (3) to provide support that enhances the ability of workers to cope with stress and work engagement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Hygiene
Japanese Journal of Hygiene Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信