足部传感器鞋垫测量全膝关节置换术后功能结果的研究。

Lauren M Chu, Peter S Walker, Richard Iorio, Joseph D Zuckerman, James D Slover, Claudette M Lajam, Ran Schwarzkopf
{"title":"足部传感器鞋垫测量全膝关节置换术后功能结果的研究。","authors":"Lauren M Chu,&nbsp;Peter S Walker,&nbsp;Richard Iorio,&nbsp;Joseph D Zuckerman,&nbsp;James D Slover,&nbsp;Claudette M Lajam,&nbsp;Ran Schwarzkopf","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To measure functional outcome, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are most often used but biomechanical tests can provide valuable supplementary data. The objective of this study was to investigate instrumented insoles for measuring ground-to-foot forces during basic activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three groups were evaluated: normal controls, preoperative, and postoperative total knees. The Knee Society Scoring System (KSS) Short Form was used, and with foot pressure sensor insoles, a timed-up-and-go (TUG) test and a sit-to-stand (STS) test was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing preoperative to postoperative and control groups, there were significant differences in most parameters. There were no significant differences between controls and postoperative knees. Of the 33 correlation coefficients between three PROM parameters and six biomechanical parameters for the three groups, only five coefficients were greater than 0.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The biomechanical data was substantially independent of the PROM data and provided additional functional evaluation. The most useful parameters were the left-right force ratios during sit-to stand (STS) and the timed-up-and-go (TUG) time.</p>","PeriodicalId":72481,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of Foot Sensor Insoles for Measuring Functional Outcome After Total Knee Replacement.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren M Chu,&nbsp;Peter S Walker,&nbsp;Richard Iorio,&nbsp;Joseph D Zuckerman,&nbsp;James D Slover,&nbsp;Claudette M Lajam,&nbsp;Ran Schwarzkopf\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To measure functional outcome, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are most often used but biomechanical tests can provide valuable supplementary data. The objective of this study was to investigate instrumented insoles for measuring ground-to-foot forces during basic activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three groups were evaluated: normal controls, preoperative, and postoperative total knees. The Knee Society Scoring System (KSS) Short Form was used, and with foot pressure sensor insoles, a timed-up-and-go (TUG) test and a sit-to-stand (STS) test was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing preoperative to postoperative and control groups, there were significant differences in most parameters. There were no significant differences between controls and postoperative knees. Of the 33 correlation coefficients between three PROM parameters and six biomechanical parameters for the three groups, only five coefficients were greater than 0.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The biomechanical data was substantially independent of the PROM data and provided additional functional evaluation. The most useful parameters were the left-right force ratios during sit-to stand (STS) and the timed-up-and-go (TUG) time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了测量功能结果,患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)是最常用的方法,但生物力学测试可以提供有价值的补充数据。本研究的目的是研究在基本活动中测量地对足力的仪器鞋垫。方法:对正常对照组、术前组和术后全膝组进行评价。使用膝关节学会评分系统(KSS)短表,并使用足部压力传感器鞋垫,进行计时起身(TUG)测试和坐立(STS)测试。结果:术前与术后、对照组比较,多数参数差异有统计学意义。对照组与术后膝关节无显著差异。在3组的3个PROM参数与6个生物力学参数的33个相关系数中,只有5个系数大于0.5。结论:生物力学数据基本上独立于PROM数据,并提供了额外的功能评估。最有用的参数是坐立(STS)时的左右力比和起跑计时(TUG)时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of Foot Sensor Insoles for Measuring Functional Outcome After Total Knee Replacement.

Background: To measure functional outcome, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are most often used but biomechanical tests can provide valuable supplementary data. The objective of this study was to investigate instrumented insoles for measuring ground-to-foot forces during basic activities.

Methods: Three groups were evaluated: normal controls, preoperative, and postoperative total knees. The Knee Society Scoring System (KSS) Short Form was used, and with foot pressure sensor insoles, a timed-up-and-go (TUG) test and a sit-to-stand (STS) test was used.

Results: Comparing preoperative to postoperative and control groups, there were significant differences in most parameters. There were no significant differences between controls and postoperative knees. Of the 33 correlation coefficients between three PROM parameters and six biomechanical parameters for the three groups, only five coefficients were greater than 0.5.

Conclusions: The biomechanical data was substantially independent of the PROM data and provided additional functional evaluation. The most useful parameters were the left-right force ratios during sit-to stand (STS) and the timed-up-and-go (TUG) time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信