膝关节骨性关节炎的步态改变策略:通过通用和特定患者肌肉骨骼模型缩放技术对关节负荷进行比较。

Q2 Medicine
C M Dzialo, M Mannisi, K S Halonen, M de Zee, J Woodburn, M S Andersen
{"title":"膝关节骨性关节炎的步态改变策略:通过通用和特定患者肌肉骨骼模型缩放技术对关节负荷进行比较。","authors":"C M Dzialo, M Mannisi, K S Halonen, M de Zee, J Woodburn, M S Andersen","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2019.1629839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gait modifications and laterally wedged insoles are non-invasive approaches used to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. However, the outcome of these alterations is still a controversial topic. This study investigates how gait alteration techniques may have a unique effect on individual patients; and furthermore, the way we scale our musculoskeletal models to estimate the medial joint contact force may influence knee loading conditions. Five patients with clinical evidence of medial knee osteoarthritis were asked to walk at a normal walking speed over force plates and simultaneously 3D motion was captured during seven conditions (0°-, 5°-, 10°-insoles, shod, toe-in, toe-out, and wide stance). We developed patient-specific musculoskeletal models, using segmentations from magnetic resonance imaging to morph a generic model to patient-specific bone geometries and applied this morphing to estimate muscle insertion sites. Additionally, models were created of these patients using a simple linear scaling method. When examining the patients' medial compartment contact force (peak and impulse) during stance phase, a 'one-size-fits-all' gait alteration aimed to reduce medial knee loading did not exist. Moreover, the different scaling methods lead to differences in medial contact forces; highlighting the importance of further investigation of musculoskeletal modeling methods prior to use in the clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"6 1","pages":"54-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gait alteration strategies for knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of joint loading via generic and patient-specific musculoskeletal model scaling techniques.\",\"authors\":\"C M Dzialo, M Mannisi, K S Halonen, M de Zee, J Woodburn, M S Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23335432.2019.1629839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gait modifications and laterally wedged insoles are non-invasive approaches used to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. However, the outcome of these alterations is still a controversial topic. This study investigates how gait alteration techniques may have a unique effect on individual patients; and furthermore, the way we scale our musculoskeletal models to estimate the medial joint contact force may influence knee loading conditions. Five patients with clinical evidence of medial knee osteoarthritis were asked to walk at a normal walking speed over force plates and simultaneously 3D motion was captured during seven conditions (0°-, 5°-, 10°-insoles, shod, toe-in, toe-out, and wide stance). We developed patient-specific musculoskeletal models, using segmentations from magnetic resonance imaging to morph a generic model to patient-specific bone geometries and applied this morphing to estimate muscle insertion sites. Additionally, models were created of these patients using a simple linear scaling method. When examining the patients' medial compartment contact force (peak and impulse) during stance phase, a 'one-size-fits-all' gait alteration aimed to reduce medial knee loading did not exist. Moreover, the different scaling methods lead to differences in medial contact forces; highlighting the importance of further investigation of musculoskeletal modeling methods prior to use in the clinical setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"54-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7857308/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2019.1629839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2019.1629839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

步态调整和侧向楔形鞋垫是用于治疗膝关节内侧室骨关节炎的非侵入性方法。然而,这些改变的结果仍是一个有争议的话题。本研究探讨了步态改变技术如何对个别患者产生独特的影响;此外,我们对肌肉骨骼模型进行缩放以估算内侧关节接触力的方法可能会影响膝关节负荷情况。我们要求五名有临床证据表明患有膝关节内侧骨关节炎的患者以正常行走速度在受力板上行走,并同时捕捉七种情况下(0°-、5°-、10°-鞋垫、穿鞋、趾入、趾出和宽站立)的三维运动。我们利用磁共振成像的分段将通用模型变形为患者特定的骨骼几何形状,并应用这种变形来估计肌肉插入部位,从而建立了患者特定的肌肉骨骼模型。此外,还使用简单的线性缩放方法创建了这些患者的模型。在检查患者站立阶段的内侧室接触力(峰值和脉冲)时,并不存在旨在减少膝关节内侧负荷的 "一刀切 "步态改变。此外,不同的缩放方法导致了内侧接触力的差异;这突出了在临床应用之前进一步研究肌肉骨骼建模方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gait alteration strategies for knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of joint loading via generic and patient-specific musculoskeletal model scaling techniques.

Gait alteration strategies for knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of joint loading via generic and patient-specific musculoskeletal model scaling techniques.

Gait alteration strategies for knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of joint loading via generic and patient-specific musculoskeletal model scaling techniques.

Gait alteration strategies for knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of joint loading via generic and patient-specific musculoskeletal model scaling techniques.

Gait modifications and laterally wedged insoles are non-invasive approaches used to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. However, the outcome of these alterations is still a controversial topic. This study investigates how gait alteration techniques may have a unique effect on individual patients; and furthermore, the way we scale our musculoskeletal models to estimate the medial joint contact force may influence knee loading conditions. Five patients with clinical evidence of medial knee osteoarthritis were asked to walk at a normal walking speed over force plates and simultaneously 3D motion was captured during seven conditions (0°-, 5°-, 10°-insoles, shod, toe-in, toe-out, and wide stance). We developed patient-specific musculoskeletal models, using segmentations from magnetic resonance imaging to morph a generic model to patient-specific bone geometries and applied this morphing to estimate muscle insertion sites. Additionally, models were created of these patients using a simple linear scaling method. When examining the patients' medial compartment contact force (peak and impulse) during stance phase, a 'one-size-fits-all' gait alteration aimed to reduce medial knee loading did not exist. Moreover, the different scaling methods lead to differences in medial contact forces; highlighting the importance of further investigation of musculoskeletal modeling methods prior to use in the clinical setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Biomechanics
International Biomechanics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: International Biomechanics is a fully Open Access biomechanics journal that aims to foster innovation, debate and collaboration across the full spectrum of biomechanics. We publish original articles, reviews, and short communications in all areas of biomechanics and welcome papers that explore: Bio-fluid mechanics, Continuum Biomechanics, Biotribology, Cellular Biomechanics, Mechanobiology, Mechano-transduction, Tissue Mechanics, Comparative Biomechanics and Functional Anatomy, Allometry, Animal locomotion in biomechanics, Gait analysis in biomechanics, Musculoskeletal and Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Cardiovascular Biomechanics, Plant Biomechanics, Injury Biomechanics, Impact Biomechanics, Sport and Exercise Biomechanics, Kinesiology, Rehabilitation in biomechanics, Quantitative Ergonomics, Human Factors engineering, Occupational Biomechanics, Developmental Biomechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信