埃塞俄比亚Mizan-Tepi大学教学医院剖宫产与阴道分娩的特点和结果比较

Margo S Harrison, Ephrem Kirub, Tewodros Liyew, Biruk Teshome, Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano, Margaret Muldrow, Teklemariam Yarinbab
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚Mizan-Tepi大学教学医院剖宫产与阴道分娩的特点和结果比较","authors":"Margo S Harrison,&nbsp;Ephrem Kirub,&nbsp;Tewodros Liyew,&nbsp;Biruk Teshome,&nbsp;Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano,&nbsp;Margaret Muldrow,&nbsp;Teklemariam Yarinbab","doi":"10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study was to observe characteristics and outcomes associated with cesarean birth as compared to vaginal birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective hospital-based cross-sectional analysis of a convenience sample of 1, 000 women. Data was collected on admission, delivery, and discharge by trained physician data collectors on paper forms through chart review and patient interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data on mode of delivery was available for 993/1000 women (0.7% missing data), 23.4% of whom underwent cesarean. These women were less likely to have labored (84.5% versus 87.4%), more likely to have been transferred (62.0% versus 45.2%), more likely to have been admitted in early labor (53.0% versus 48.6%), more likely to be in labor for longer than 24 hours (10.7% versus 3.3%) and were less likely to have multiple gestation (7.7% versus 3.9%), p < 0.05. In a Poisson model, history of cesarean (aRR 2.0, p < 0.001), transfer during labor (RR 1.5, p = 0.003), labor longer than 24 hours and larger birthweight (RR 2.7, p 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of cesarean.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis suggests cesarean birth is being used among women with a history of prior cesarean and in cases of labor complications (prolonged labor or transfer), but fresh stillbirth is still common in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":74017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health and development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8143043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics and Outcomes Associated with Cesarean Birth as Compared to Vaginal Birth at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Margo S Harrison,&nbsp;Ephrem Kirub,&nbsp;Tewodros Liyew,&nbsp;Biruk Teshome,&nbsp;Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano,&nbsp;Margaret Muldrow,&nbsp;Teklemariam Yarinbab\",\"doi\":\"10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study was to observe characteristics and outcomes associated with cesarean birth as compared to vaginal birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective hospital-based cross-sectional analysis of a convenience sample of 1, 000 women. Data was collected on admission, delivery, and discharge by trained physician data collectors on paper forms through chart review and patient interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data on mode of delivery was available for 993/1000 women (0.7% missing data), 23.4% of whom underwent cesarean. These women were less likely to have labored (84.5% versus 87.4%), more likely to have been transferred (62.0% versus 45.2%), more likely to have been admitted in early labor (53.0% versus 48.6%), more likely to be in labor for longer than 24 hours (10.7% versus 3.3%) and were less likely to have multiple gestation (7.7% versus 3.9%), p < 0.05. In a Poisson model, history of cesarean (aRR 2.0, p < 0.001), transfer during labor (RR 1.5, p = 0.003), labor longer than 24 hours and larger birthweight (RR 2.7, p 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of cesarean.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis suggests cesarean birth is being used among women with a history of prior cesarean and in cases of labor complications (prolonged labor or transfer), but fresh stillbirth is still common in this setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health and development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8143043/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health and development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本研究的目的是观察剖宫产与阴道分娩的特点和结果。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性的基于医院的横断面分析,样本为1000名妇女。入院、分娩和出院的数据由训练有素的医生数据收集人员通过图表审查和患者访谈收集纸质表格。结果:993/1000名妇女可获得分娩方式数据(0.7%缺失数据),其中23.4%接受剖宫产。这些妇女分娩的可能性较小(84.5%对87.4%),转移的可能性较大(62.0%对45.2%),早期分娩时入院的可能性较大(53.0%对48.6%),分娩时间超过24小时的可能性较大(10.7%对3.3%),多胎妊娠的可能性较小(7.7%对3.9%),p < 0.05。在泊松模型中,剖宫产史(aRR 2.0, p < 0.001)、分娩时转移(RR 1.5, p = 0.003)、分娩时间超过24小时和出生体重较大(RR 2.7, p = 0.001)与剖宫产风险增加相关。结论:我们的分析表明,有剖宫产史和分娩并发症(延长分娩或转移)的妇女正在使用剖宫产,但在这种情况下新鲜死产仍然很常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Characteristics and Outcomes Associated with Cesarean Birth as Compared to Vaginal Birth at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia.

Characteristics and Outcomes Associated with Cesarean Birth as Compared to Vaginal Birth at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia.

Introduction: The objective of this study was to observe characteristics and outcomes associated with cesarean birth as compared to vaginal birth.

Methods: This study was a prospective hospital-based cross-sectional analysis of a convenience sample of 1, 000 women. Data was collected on admission, delivery, and discharge by trained physician data collectors on paper forms through chart review and patient interview.

Results: Data on mode of delivery was available for 993/1000 women (0.7% missing data), 23.4% of whom underwent cesarean. These women were less likely to have labored (84.5% versus 87.4%), more likely to have been transferred (62.0% versus 45.2%), more likely to have been admitted in early labor (53.0% versus 48.6%), more likely to be in labor for longer than 24 hours (10.7% versus 3.3%) and were less likely to have multiple gestation (7.7% versus 3.9%), p < 0.05. In a Poisson model, history of cesarean (aRR 2.0, p < 0.001), transfer during labor (RR 1.5, p = 0.003), labor longer than 24 hours and larger birthweight (RR 2.7, p 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of cesarean.

Conclusion: Our analysis suggests cesarean birth is being used among women with a history of prior cesarean and in cases of labor complications (prolonged labor or transfer), but fresh stillbirth is still common in this setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信