当前使用,感知障碍和学习偏好的护理点超声(POCUS)在急诊医学在卡塔尔-一个混合设计。

Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM Pub Date : 2021-05-18 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S304153
Khalid Bashir, Aftab Mohammad Azad, Ayman Hereiz, Mohammed Talha Bashir, Maarij Masood, Amr Elmoheen
{"title":"当前使用,感知障碍和学习偏好的护理点超声(POCUS)在急诊医学在卡塔尔-一个混合设计。","authors":"Khalid Bashir,&nbsp;Aftab Mohammad Azad,&nbsp;Ayman Hereiz,&nbsp;Mohammed Talha Bashir,&nbsp;Maarij Masood,&nbsp;Amr Elmoheen","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S304153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has been a part of emergency medicine (EM) training for almost two decades. EM training program has a very broad and rigorous POCUS curricula which, in several cases, does not translate to routine application in clinical settings. This study therefore sought to compare the indications, utilization, barriers, and preferred POCUS educational method in a large Middle Eastern academic EM.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A validated questionnaire was emailed to 50 EM faculties between April and May 2019. Volunteer faculty members partook in a semi-structured interview to better understand the indications, current use, barriers, and preferred learning method. Responses were anonymous, and data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This was a mixed design study. 30/50 (60%) of faculty responded to the survey, with a mean age of 39.2 years and a mean number of years in practice, 13.1. 55% (n=28) completed POCUS training in less than five years, while 45% completed more than five years ago and 5% never completed it. Forty percent of EM physicians were trained in Africa, while 55% were qualified in Asia and 5% completed their training in Europe. The indications and frequently performed procedures were consistent with the previous research. The common barrier reported was lack of time, lack of credentialing, lack of quality assurance, and national guidelines. The majority of the faculty preferred a blended learning approach for POCUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS perceived barriers to its full use include time constraints, lack of national guidelines, and credentialing (awarding POCUS qualifications) of the faculty. Blended learning appears to be the preferred approach towards acquiring the knowledge and skills of POCUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":503614,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","volume":"13 ","pages":"177-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/55/48/oaem-13-177.PMC8140913.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Use, Perceived Barriers, and Learning Preference of Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in the Emergency Medicine in Qatar - A Mixed Design.\",\"authors\":\"Khalid Bashir,&nbsp;Aftab Mohammad Azad,&nbsp;Ayman Hereiz,&nbsp;Mohammed Talha Bashir,&nbsp;Maarij Masood,&nbsp;Amr Elmoheen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAEM.S304153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has been a part of emergency medicine (EM) training for almost two decades. EM training program has a very broad and rigorous POCUS curricula which, in several cases, does not translate to routine application in clinical settings. This study therefore sought to compare the indications, utilization, barriers, and preferred POCUS educational method in a large Middle Eastern academic EM.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A validated questionnaire was emailed to 50 EM faculties between April and May 2019. Volunteer faculty members partook in a semi-structured interview to better understand the indications, current use, barriers, and preferred learning method. Responses were anonymous, and data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This was a mixed design study. 30/50 (60%) of faculty responded to the survey, with a mean age of 39.2 years and a mean number of years in practice, 13.1. 55% (n=28) completed POCUS training in less than five years, while 45% completed more than five years ago and 5% never completed it. Forty percent of EM physicians were trained in Africa, while 55% were qualified in Asia and 5% completed their training in Europe. The indications and frequently performed procedures were consistent with the previous research. The common barrier reported was lack of time, lack of credentialing, lack of quality assurance, and national guidelines. The majority of the faculty preferred a blended learning approach for POCUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS perceived barriers to its full use include time constraints, lack of national guidelines, and credentialing (awarding POCUS qualifications) of the faculty. Blended learning appears to be the preferred approach towards acquiring the knowledge and skills of POCUS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":503614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"177-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/55/48/oaem-13-177.PMC8140913.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S304153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S304153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

导读:近二十年来,护理点超声(POCUS)一直是急诊医学(EM)培训的一部分。EM培训计划具有非常广泛和严格的POCUS课程,在某些情况下,这些课程不能转化为临床环境中的常规应用。因此,本研究旨在比较中东大型学术EM的适应症、使用情况、障碍和首选POCUS教育方法。方法:2019年4月至5月期间,通过电子邮件向50个EM学院发送了一份经过验证的问卷。志愿者教师参加了一个半结构化的访谈,以更好地了解适应症、当前使用、障碍和首选的学习方法。回答是匿名的,数据用描述性统计进行分析。结果:这是一项混合设计研究。30/50(60%)的教师回应了调查,平均年龄为39.2岁,平均实习年限为13.1年。55% (n=28)在不到5年的时间内完成了POCUS培训,45%在5年前完成培训,5%从未完成培训。40%的急诊医生在非洲接受培训,55%在亚洲获得资格,5%在欧洲完成培训。适应症和经常执行的程序与先前的研究一致。常见的障碍是缺乏时间、缺乏资格、缺乏质量保证和国家指导方针。大多数教师更喜欢POCUS的混合学习方法。结论:POCUS认为充分利用的障碍包括时间限制,缺乏国家指导方针,以及教员的资格认证(授予POCUS资格)。混合学习似乎是获得POCUS知识和技能的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Current Use, Perceived Barriers, and Learning Preference of Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in the Emergency Medicine in Qatar - A Mixed Design.

Current Use, Perceived Barriers, and Learning Preference of Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in the Emergency Medicine in Qatar - A Mixed Design.

Introduction: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has been a part of emergency medicine (EM) training for almost two decades. EM training program has a very broad and rigorous POCUS curricula which, in several cases, does not translate to routine application in clinical settings. This study therefore sought to compare the indications, utilization, barriers, and preferred POCUS educational method in a large Middle Eastern academic EM.

Methodology: A validated questionnaire was emailed to 50 EM faculties between April and May 2019. Volunteer faculty members partook in a semi-structured interview to better understand the indications, current use, barriers, and preferred learning method. Responses were anonymous, and data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.

Results: This was a mixed design study. 30/50 (60%) of faculty responded to the survey, with a mean age of 39.2 years and a mean number of years in practice, 13.1. 55% (n=28) completed POCUS training in less than five years, while 45% completed more than five years ago and 5% never completed it. Forty percent of EM physicians were trained in Africa, while 55% were qualified in Asia and 5% completed their training in Europe. The indications and frequently performed procedures were consistent with the previous research. The common barrier reported was lack of time, lack of credentialing, lack of quality assurance, and national guidelines. The majority of the faculty preferred a blended learning approach for POCUS.

Conclusion: POCUS perceived barriers to its full use include time constraints, lack of national guidelines, and credentialing (awarding POCUS qualifications) of the faculty. Blended learning appears to be the preferred approach towards acquiring the knowledge and skills of POCUS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信