耳鼻喉科医生口腔过敏综合征实践模式。

IF 2.3 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Allergy & Rhinology Pub Date : 2021-05-28 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21526567211021305
Yunjia Zhang Md, Haidy Marzouk Md
{"title":"耳鼻喉科医生口腔过敏综合征实践模式。","authors":"Yunjia Zhang Md, Haidy Marzouk Md","doi":"10.1177/21526567211021305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral allergy syndrome is a unique type of food allergy caused by cross-sensitivity between inhalant allergens and food allergens. Despite its significant prevalence and potentially serious outcome, the knowledge base and practice patterns on OAS are not well known among otolaryngologists. Our study is designed to understand the practice patterns of otolaryngologists in screening, testing, and treating OAS through a web-based survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three thousand otolaryngologists were randomly selected from a membership list of the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. A survey was designed to include demographic questions and questions about OAS understanding, screening, and management. Surveys were sent to selected otolaryngologists via mail. Responses were de-identified and analyzed using SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 50 survey responses, 46 reported treating environmental allergy in their practices. Twenty eight out of 46 reported knowing about OAS (60.9%). Fifteen out of the 28 physicians screened for OAS (53.6%). Out of the responders who knew about OAS, 12 (42.9%) reported diagnosing under 5 cases in the past year, 7 (25%) diagnosed 5 to 10 cases, and 7 (25%) reported diagnosed more than 10 cases in the past year. Eleven (39.3%) reported ordering component allergy testing for food allergies. Twenty six (92.9%) reported using avoidance, 18 (64.3%) prescribed oral antihistamine medications, 14 (50%) prescribed epi-pen, and 19 (67.9%) desensitized patients to environmental allergies as a treatment for OAS. 26 (93%) reported using more than one of the listed treatments. 10 (36%) reported using all four methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only 60.9% of the responders had a knowledge of OAS. Only 53.6% of those screened for OAS. Current treatment for OAS includes avoidance of allergens, desensitization of environmental allergens, prescription of oral antihistamine and epi-pen. Nearly everyone (93%) reported using more than one treatment method.</p>","PeriodicalId":45192,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/1d/10.1177_21526567211021305.PMC8165865.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Otolaryngologists Practice Pattern on Oral Allergy Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Yunjia Zhang Md, Haidy Marzouk Md\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21526567211021305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral allergy syndrome is a unique type of food allergy caused by cross-sensitivity between inhalant allergens and food allergens. Despite its significant prevalence and potentially serious outcome, the knowledge base and practice patterns on OAS are not well known among otolaryngologists. Our study is designed to understand the practice patterns of otolaryngologists in screening, testing, and treating OAS through a web-based survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three thousand otolaryngologists were randomly selected from a membership list of the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. A survey was designed to include demographic questions and questions about OAS understanding, screening, and management. Surveys were sent to selected otolaryngologists via mail. Responses were de-identified and analyzed using SPSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 50 survey responses, 46 reported treating environmental allergy in their practices. Twenty eight out of 46 reported knowing about OAS (60.9%). Fifteen out of the 28 physicians screened for OAS (53.6%). Out of the responders who knew about OAS, 12 (42.9%) reported diagnosing under 5 cases in the past year, 7 (25%) diagnosed 5 to 10 cases, and 7 (25%) reported diagnosed more than 10 cases in the past year. Eleven (39.3%) reported ordering component allergy testing for food allergies. Twenty six (92.9%) reported using avoidance, 18 (64.3%) prescribed oral antihistamine medications, 14 (50%) prescribed epi-pen, and 19 (67.9%) desensitized patients to environmental allergies as a treatment for OAS. 26 (93%) reported using more than one of the listed treatments. 10 (36%) reported using all four methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only 60.9% of the responders had a knowledge of OAS. Only 53.6% of those screened for OAS. Current treatment for OAS includes avoidance of allergens, desensitization of environmental allergens, prescription of oral antihistamine and epi-pen. Nearly everyone (93%) reported using more than one treatment method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy & Rhinology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/1d/10.1177_21526567211021305.PMC8165865.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy & Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21526567211021305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21526567211021305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:口腔过敏综合征是一种独特的食物过敏类型,由吸入性过敏原和食物过敏原之间的交叉过敏引起。尽管口腔过敏综合征的发病率很高,并可能造成严重后果,但耳鼻喉科医生对其知识基础和诊疗模式却知之甚少。我们的研究旨在通过网络调查了解耳鼻喉科医生在筛查、检测和治疗 OAS 方面的实践模式:方法:我们从美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会的会员名单中随机抽取了三千名耳鼻喉科医生。调查内容包括人口统计学问题以及有关对 OAS 的理解、筛查和管理的问题。调查表通过邮件发送给选定的耳鼻喉科医生。调查结果:在 50 份调查回复中,有 46 份回复称他们在诊疗过程中治疗环境过敏。46 位医生中有 28 位表示了解 OAS(60.9%)。28 位医生中有 15 位接受过 OAS 筛查(53.6%)。在了解 OAS 的受访者中,有 12 人(42.9%)表示在过去一年中诊断出 5 例以下病例,7 人(25%)诊断出 5 至 10 例病例,7 人(25%)表示在过去一年中诊断出 10 例以上病例。11人(39.3%)报告说,他们订购了针对食物过敏的过敏成分检测。26 人(92.9%)报告使用了回避疗法,18 人(64.3%)处方了口服抗组胺药物,14 人(50%)处方了肾上腺素笔,19 人(67.9%)对患者进行了环境过敏脱敏治疗。26人(93%)报告使用了一种以上的治疗方法。10人(36%)报告使用了所有四种方法:只有 60.9% 的受访者了解 OAS。只有 53.6% 的人接受过 OAS 筛查。目前治疗 OAS 的方法包括避免接触过敏原、对环境过敏原进行脱敏治疗、处方口服抗组胺药和肾上腺素笔。几乎所有人(93%)都表示使用了一种以上的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Otolaryngologists Practice Pattern on Oral Allergy Syndrome.

Otolaryngologists Practice Pattern on Oral Allergy Syndrome.

Otolaryngologists Practice Pattern on Oral Allergy Syndrome.

Otolaryngologists Practice Pattern on Oral Allergy Syndrome.

Background: Oral allergy syndrome is a unique type of food allergy caused by cross-sensitivity between inhalant allergens and food allergens. Despite its significant prevalence and potentially serious outcome, the knowledge base and practice patterns on OAS are not well known among otolaryngologists. Our study is designed to understand the practice patterns of otolaryngologists in screening, testing, and treating OAS through a web-based survey.

Methods: Three thousand otolaryngologists were randomly selected from a membership list of the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. A survey was designed to include demographic questions and questions about OAS understanding, screening, and management. Surveys were sent to selected otolaryngologists via mail. Responses were de-identified and analyzed using SPSS.

Results: Out of the 50 survey responses, 46 reported treating environmental allergy in their practices. Twenty eight out of 46 reported knowing about OAS (60.9%). Fifteen out of the 28 physicians screened for OAS (53.6%). Out of the responders who knew about OAS, 12 (42.9%) reported diagnosing under 5 cases in the past year, 7 (25%) diagnosed 5 to 10 cases, and 7 (25%) reported diagnosed more than 10 cases in the past year. Eleven (39.3%) reported ordering component allergy testing for food allergies. Twenty six (92.9%) reported using avoidance, 18 (64.3%) prescribed oral antihistamine medications, 14 (50%) prescribed epi-pen, and 19 (67.9%) desensitized patients to environmental allergies as a treatment for OAS. 26 (93%) reported using more than one of the listed treatments. 10 (36%) reported using all four methods.

Conclusion: Only 60.9% of the responders had a knowledge of OAS. Only 53.6% of those screened for OAS. Current treatment for OAS includes avoidance of allergens, desensitization of environmental allergens, prescription of oral antihistamine and epi-pen. Nearly everyone (93%) reported using more than one treatment method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Allergy & Rhinology
Allergy & Rhinology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
11
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信