Raquel García Vela, Rosa Cabanas Valdés, Santos Huertas Ríos, Rafel Donat Roca, Pol Monné Cuevas, Luciana Moizé Arcone, Jordi Calvo Sanz
{"title":"[基于实验研究的自滤口罩与外科口罩在医护人员SARS-COV-2患者防护中的调整分析]。","authors":"Raquel García Vela, Rosa Cabanas Valdés, Santos Huertas Ríos, Rafel Donat Roca, Pol Monné Cuevas, Luciana Moizé Arcone, Jordi Calvo Sanz","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2021.24.02.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frontline healthcare workers have a high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, which causes COVID-19. The use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential to prevent this occupational disease. Surgical masks and filtering face piece (FFP) respirators are important parts of this PPE. European standard EN 149 establishes three protection levels for FFP respirators (FFP1, FFP2, FFP3), depending on the particle infiltration degree through their materials, and these, in turn, are based on their filtration effectiveness. The aim of this laboratory test is to determine and quantify the filtration and fit rate of different FFP respirators, singly and in combination with surgical masks, by performing a series of fit tests and consequently, to check whether this combination improves protection levels for healthcare workers who care for COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Several FFP respirators and surgical masks, singly and in combination, were fit tested with a PortaCount Pro + 8038, which fulfills OSHA standards, in a series of tests performed on healthcare workers in seven different breathing situations when taking care on COVID-19 patients, in order to determine and quantify their fit to the workers' face.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Wearing a surgical mask together with a highly efficient FFP respirator provided increased respiratory protection. Interestingly, one of these highly efficient FFP models, combined with a surgical mask, achieved a protection factor over 200 (whereas 100 is the minimum required protection factor).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical masks, when used together with a FFP2 respirator, could significant ly improve the degree of fit of all self-filtering face piece by providing greater filtration efficiency and greater user protection from exposure to aerosols.</p>","PeriodicalId":38326,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","volume":"24 2","pages":"67-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Analysis of the Adjustment of Self-Filtering Masks in Combination with Surgical Masks for the Protection of Health Professionals in the Care of Patients Affected by SARS-COV-2 from an Experimental Study].\",\"authors\":\"Raquel García Vela, Rosa Cabanas Valdés, Santos Huertas Ríos, Rafel Donat Roca, Pol Monné Cuevas, Luciana Moizé Arcone, Jordi Calvo Sanz\",\"doi\":\"10.12961/aprl.2021.24.02.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frontline healthcare workers have a high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, which causes COVID-19. The use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential to prevent this occupational disease. Surgical masks and filtering face piece (FFP) respirators are important parts of this PPE. European standard EN 149 establishes three protection levels for FFP respirators (FFP1, FFP2, FFP3), depending on the particle infiltration degree through their materials, and these, in turn, are based on their filtration effectiveness. The aim of this laboratory test is to determine and quantify the filtration and fit rate of different FFP respirators, singly and in combination with surgical masks, by performing a series of fit tests and consequently, to check whether this combination improves protection levels for healthcare workers who care for COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Several FFP respirators and surgical masks, singly and in combination, were fit tested with a PortaCount Pro + 8038, which fulfills OSHA standards, in a series of tests performed on healthcare workers in seven different breathing situations when taking care on COVID-19 patients, in order to determine and quantify their fit to the workers' face.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Wearing a surgical mask together with a highly efficient FFP respirator provided increased respiratory protection. Interestingly, one of these highly efficient FFP models, combined with a surgical mask, achieved a protection factor over 200 (whereas 100 is the minimum required protection factor).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical masks, when used together with a FFP2 respirator, could significant ly improve the degree of fit of all self-filtering face piece by providing greater filtration efficiency and greater user protection from exposure to aerosols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"67-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2021.24.02.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2021.24.02.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:一线医护人员暴露于导致COVID-19的SARS-CoV-2冠状病毒的风险很高。使用适当的个人防护装备对于预防这种职业病至关重要。医用口罩和过滤式面罩是这种个人防护装备的重要组成部分。欧洲标准EN 149为FFP呼吸器建立了三个防护级别(FFP1, FFP2, FFP3),这取决于颗粒通过其材料的渗透程度,而这些又基于其过滤效果。本实验室测试的目的是通过进行一系列匹配测试,确定和量化不同FFP呼吸器单独使用和与外科口罩结合使用的过滤率和匹配率,从而检查这种组合是否提高了护理COVID-19患者的医护人员的保护水平。材料和方法:在护理COVID-19患者时,在七种不同呼吸情况下对医护人员进行了一系列测试,并使用符合OSHA标准的portaccount Pro + 8038对几种FFP呼吸器和外科口罩进行了单独和组合测试,以确定和量化其与工人面部的契合度。结果:医用外科口罩与高效FFP呼吸器配合使用可增强呼吸保护。有趣的是,其中一种高效FFP模型与外科口罩相结合,实现了超过200的保护系数(而100是最低要求的保护系数)。结论:医用医用口罩与FFP2呼吸器配合使用,可显著提高全自过滤面罩的贴合度,提高过滤效率,增强使用者对气溶胶暴露的防护。
[Analysis of the Adjustment of Self-Filtering Masks in Combination with Surgical Masks for the Protection of Health Professionals in the Care of Patients Affected by SARS-COV-2 from an Experimental Study].
Introduction: Frontline healthcare workers have a high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, which causes COVID-19. The use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential to prevent this occupational disease. Surgical masks and filtering face piece (FFP) respirators are important parts of this PPE. European standard EN 149 establishes three protection levels for FFP respirators (FFP1, FFP2, FFP3), depending on the particle infiltration degree through their materials, and these, in turn, are based on their filtration effectiveness. The aim of this laboratory test is to determine and quantify the filtration and fit rate of different FFP respirators, singly and in combination with surgical masks, by performing a series of fit tests and consequently, to check whether this combination improves protection levels for healthcare workers who care for COVID-19 patients.
Material and methods: Several FFP respirators and surgical masks, singly and in combination, were fit tested with a PortaCount Pro + 8038, which fulfills OSHA standards, in a series of tests performed on healthcare workers in seven different breathing situations when taking care on COVID-19 patients, in order to determine and quantify their fit to the workers' face.
Results: Wearing a surgical mask together with a highly efficient FFP respirator provided increased respiratory protection. Interestingly, one of these highly efficient FFP models, combined with a surgical mask, achieved a protection factor over 200 (whereas 100 is the minimum required protection factor).
Conclusions: Surgical masks, when used together with a FFP2 respirator, could significant ly improve the degree of fit of all self-filtering face piece by providing greater filtration efficiency and greater user protection from exposure to aerosols.