副肿瘤神经综合征的最新诊断标准。

Francesc Graus, Alberto Vogrig, Sergio Muñiz-Castrillo, Jean-Christophe G Antoine, Virginie Desestret, Divyanshu Dubey, Bruno Giometto, Sarosh R Irani, Bastien Joubert, Frank Leypoldt, Andrew McKeon, Harald Prüss, Dimitri Psimaras, Laure Thomas, Maarten J Titulaer, Christian A Vedeler, Jan J Verschuuren, Josep Dalmau, Jerome Honnorat
{"title":"副肿瘤神经综合征的最新诊断标准。","authors":"Francesc Graus, Alberto Vogrig, Sergio Muñiz-Castrillo, Jean-Christophe G Antoine, Virginie Desestret, Divyanshu Dubey, Bruno Giometto, Sarosh R Irani, Bastien Joubert, Frank Leypoldt, Andrew McKeon, Harald Prüss, Dimitri Psimaras, Laure Thomas, Maarten J Titulaer, Christian A Vedeler, Jan J Verschuuren, Josep Dalmau, Jerome Honnorat","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000001014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The contemporary diagnosis of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNSs) requires an increasing understanding of their clinical, immunologic, and oncologic heterogeneity. The 2004 PNS criteria are partially outdated due to advances in PNS research in the last 16 years leading to the identification of new phenotypes and antibodies that have transformed the diagnostic approach to PNS. Here, we propose updated diagnostic criteria for PNS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel of experts developed by consensus a modified set of diagnostic PNS criteria for clinical decision making and research purposes. The panel reappraised the 2004 criteria alongside new knowledge on PNS obtained from published and unpublished data generated by the different laboratories involved in the project.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel proposed to substitute \"classical syndromes\" with the term \"high-risk phenotypes\" for cancer and introduce the concept of \"intermediate-risk phenotypes.\" The term \"onconeural antibody\" was replaced by \"high risk\" (>70% associated with cancer) and \"intermediate risk\" (30%-70% associated with cancer) antibodies. The panel classified 3 levels of evidence for PNS: definite, probable, and possible. Each level can be reached by using the PNS-Care Score, which combines clinical phenotype, antibody type, the presence or absence of cancer, and time of follow-up. With the exception of opsoclonus-myoclonus, the diagnosis of definite PNS requires the presence of high- or intermediate-risk antibodies. Specific recommendations for similar syndromes triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors are also provided.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed criteria and recommendations should be used to enhance the clinical care of patients with PNS and to encourage standardization of research initiatives addressing PNS.</p>","PeriodicalId":520720,"journal":{"name":"Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes.\",\"authors\":\"Francesc Graus, Alberto Vogrig, Sergio Muñiz-Castrillo, Jean-Christophe G Antoine, Virginie Desestret, Divyanshu Dubey, Bruno Giometto, Sarosh R Irani, Bastien Joubert, Frank Leypoldt, Andrew McKeon, Harald Prüss, Dimitri Psimaras, Laure Thomas, Maarten J Titulaer, Christian A Vedeler, Jan J Verschuuren, Josep Dalmau, Jerome Honnorat\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/NXI.0000000000001014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The contemporary diagnosis of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNSs) requires an increasing understanding of their clinical, immunologic, and oncologic heterogeneity. The 2004 PNS criteria are partially outdated due to advances in PNS research in the last 16 years leading to the identification of new phenotypes and antibodies that have transformed the diagnostic approach to PNS. Here, we propose updated diagnostic criteria for PNS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel of experts developed by consensus a modified set of diagnostic PNS criteria for clinical decision making and research purposes. The panel reappraised the 2004 criteria alongside new knowledge on PNS obtained from published and unpublished data generated by the different laboratories involved in the project.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel proposed to substitute \\\"classical syndromes\\\" with the term \\\"high-risk phenotypes\\\" for cancer and introduce the concept of \\\"intermediate-risk phenotypes.\\\" The term \\\"onconeural antibody\\\" was replaced by \\\"high risk\\\" (>70% associated with cancer) and \\\"intermediate risk\\\" (30%-70% associated with cancer) antibodies. The panel classified 3 levels of evidence for PNS: definite, probable, and possible. Each level can be reached by using the PNS-Care Score, which combines clinical phenotype, antibody type, the presence or absence of cancer, and time of follow-up. With the exception of opsoclonus-myoclonus, the diagnosis of definite PNS requires the presence of high- or intermediate-risk antibodies. Specific recommendations for similar syndromes triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors are also provided.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed criteria and recommendations should be used to enhance the clinical care of patients with PNS and to encourage standardization of research initiatives addressing PNS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237398/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:当代副肿瘤神经综合征(PNSs)的诊断需要对其临床、免疫学和肿瘤学异质性有更深入的了解。2004年的PNS标准部分过时,因为在过去16年中,PNS研究取得了进展,发现了新的表型和抗体,改变了PNS的诊断方法。在此,我们提出更新的PNS诊断标准。方法:一个专家小组通过协商一致制定了一套修改后的PNS诊断标准,用于临床决策和研究目的。该小组重新评估了2004年的标准,并从参与该项目的不同实验室产生的已发表和未发表的数据中获得了关于PNS的新知识。结果:专家组建议用术语“高风险表型”代替癌症的“经典综合征”,并引入“中等风险表型”的概念。术语“肿瘤神经抗体”被“高风险”(与癌症相关的约70%)和“中等风险”(与癌症相关的约30%-70%)抗体所取代。专家小组将PNS的证据分为三个级别:确定、可能和可能。每个级别都可以通过使用PNS-Care评分来达到,该评分结合了临床表型、抗体类型、是否存在癌症以及随访时间。除了负阵挛-肌阵挛外,确诊PNS需要有高或中危抗体。对免疫检查点抑制剂引发的类似综合征也提供了具体建议。结论:提出的标准和建议应用于加强PNS患者的临床护理,并鼓励针对PNS的研究活动的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes.

Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes.

Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes.

Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes.

Objective: The contemporary diagnosis of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNSs) requires an increasing understanding of their clinical, immunologic, and oncologic heterogeneity. The 2004 PNS criteria are partially outdated due to advances in PNS research in the last 16 years leading to the identification of new phenotypes and antibodies that have transformed the diagnostic approach to PNS. Here, we propose updated diagnostic criteria for PNS.

Methods: A panel of experts developed by consensus a modified set of diagnostic PNS criteria for clinical decision making and research purposes. The panel reappraised the 2004 criteria alongside new knowledge on PNS obtained from published and unpublished data generated by the different laboratories involved in the project.

Results: The panel proposed to substitute "classical syndromes" with the term "high-risk phenotypes" for cancer and introduce the concept of "intermediate-risk phenotypes." The term "onconeural antibody" was replaced by "high risk" (>70% associated with cancer) and "intermediate risk" (30%-70% associated with cancer) antibodies. The panel classified 3 levels of evidence for PNS: definite, probable, and possible. Each level can be reached by using the PNS-Care Score, which combines clinical phenotype, antibody type, the presence or absence of cancer, and time of follow-up. With the exception of opsoclonus-myoclonus, the diagnosis of definite PNS requires the presence of high- or intermediate-risk antibodies. Specific recommendations for similar syndromes triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors are also provided.

Conclusions: The proposed criteria and recommendations should be used to enhance the clinical care of patients with PNS and to encourage standardization of research initiatives addressing PNS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信