Agharza Ashurov, Melanie Hundhammer, Walter Sekundo, Stephan Schulze
{"title":"[各种玻璃体视网膜疾病硅油去除术后复发性视网膜脱离的原因及危险因素]。","authors":"Agharza Ashurov, Melanie Hundhammer, Walter Sekundo, Stephan Schulze","doi":"10.1007/s00347-021-01420-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pars plana vitrectomy (ppV) combined with silicone oil tamponade is a standard technique in the treatment of complicated retinal detachment. There are still recurrent cases of retinal detachment after silicone oil removal or redetachment with in situ oil tamponade.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to identify possible risk factors for retinal redetachment and to use the knowledge for optimizing treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of data from patients who were treated with ppV and silicone oil tamponade in the University Department of Ophthalmology in Marburg during 2010-2015 and who had a retinal redetachment during this period. The results were divided into two groups, redetachment with oil in situ and redetachment after oil removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 cases (15.6%) had a redetachment, which included 22/43 cases (50%) with a redetachment after oil removal and 21/43 cases (50%) with redetachment with oil in situ. The cause for the renewed detachment was given as proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in 90.6% (39/43) of the cases, new foramina in 20.9% (9/43) and persisting foramina in 25.5% (11/43).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vitreoretinal scar formation (PVR reaction) was the main risk factor for renewed retinal detachment. Persisting foramina were also named as a frequent cause. Recurrent retinal detachment represents a significant challenge for vitreoretinal surgeons and for the patients considering the economic and emotional burden due to multiple interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54676,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologe","volume":"119 2","pages":"170-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00347-021-01420-6","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Reasons and risk factors for recurrent retinal detachment after removal of silicon oil in various vitreoretinal diseases].\",\"authors\":\"Agharza Ashurov, Melanie Hundhammer, Walter Sekundo, Stephan Schulze\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00347-021-01420-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pars plana vitrectomy (ppV) combined with silicone oil tamponade is a standard technique in the treatment of complicated retinal detachment. There are still recurrent cases of retinal detachment after silicone oil removal or redetachment with in situ oil tamponade.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to identify possible risk factors for retinal redetachment and to use the knowledge for optimizing treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of data from patients who were treated with ppV and silicone oil tamponade in the University Department of Ophthalmology in Marburg during 2010-2015 and who had a retinal redetachment during this period. The results were divided into two groups, redetachment with oil in situ and redetachment after oil removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 cases (15.6%) had a redetachment, which included 22/43 cases (50%) with a redetachment after oil removal and 21/43 cases (50%) with redetachment with oil in situ. The cause for the renewed detachment was given as proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in 90.6% (39/43) of the cases, new foramina in 20.9% (9/43) and persisting foramina in 25.5% (11/43).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vitreoretinal scar formation (PVR reaction) was the main risk factor for renewed retinal detachment. Persisting foramina were also named as a frequent cause. Recurrent retinal detachment represents a significant challenge for vitreoretinal surgeons and for the patients considering the economic and emotional burden due to multiple interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmologe\",\"volume\":\"119 2\",\"pages\":\"170-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00347-021-01420-6\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmologe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01420-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologe","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01420-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Reasons and risk factors for recurrent retinal detachment after removal of silicon oil in various vitreoretinal diseases].
Background: Pars plana vitrectomy (ppV) combined with silicone oil tamponade is a standard technique in the treatment of complicated retinal detachment. There are still recurrent cases of retinal detachment after silicone oil removal or redetachment with in situ oil tamponade.
Objective: The aim was to identify possible risk factors for retinal redetachment and to use the knowledge for optimizing treatment.
Methods: Analysis of data from patients who were treated with ppV and silicone oil tamponade in the University Department of Ophthalmology in Marburg during 2010-2015 and who had a retinal redetachment during this period. The results were divided into two groups, redetachment with oil in situ and redetachment after oil removal.
Results: A total of 43 cases (15.6%) had a redetachment, which included 22/43 cases (50%) with a redetachment after oil removal and 21/43 cases (50%) with redetachment with oil in situ. The cause for the renewed detachment was given as proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in 90.6% (39/43) of the cases, new foramina in 20.9% (9/43) and persisting foramina in 25.5% (11/43).
Conclusion: Vitreoretinal scar formation (PVR reaction) was the main risk factor for renewed retinal detachment. Persisting foramina were also named as a frequent cause. Recurrent retinal detachment represents a significant challenge for vitreoretinal surgeons and for the patients considering the economic and emotional burden due to multiple interventions.
期刊介绍:
Der Ophthalmologe is an internationally recognized journal dealing with all aspects of ophthalmology. The journal serves both the scientific exchange and the continuing education of ophthalmologists.
Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve scientific exchange.
Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy.
Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.