建立护理学科认识论的知识模式:Chinn和Kramer工作中的过度解释和简化。

IF 0.2 Q4 Medicine
Nicolas Vonarx
{"title":"建立护理学科认识论的知识模式:Chinn和Kramer工作中的过度解释和简化。","authors":"Nicolas Vonarx","doi":"10.3917/rsi.144.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Every academic discipline nurturing its own science draws on the development and dissemination of a knowledge. In pursuit of this project, the nursing discipline has proposed various conceptualizations of knowledge. The one developed by Chinn and Kramer, following Carper&#8217;s work, is without doubt the most prominent and most often borrowed concept in discussing the epistemological foundations of the discipline. This thoughtful article proposes an in-depth critical analysis of this theoretical development by focusing on &#8220;personal&#8221; and &#8220;esthetic&#8221; knowledge. As part of the analysis, the author scrutinizes the inherent logics that support these patterns of knowing. Finally, the author highlights some overinterpretations and discrepancies with regard to nursing practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":44071,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","volume":"144 1","pages":"44-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Des modes de savoir pour affirmer une épistémologie disciplinaire infirmière : des surinterprétations et réductions dans les travaux de Chinn et Kramer.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Vonarx\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/rsi.144.0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Every academic discipline nurturing its own science draws on the development and dissemination of a knowledge. In pursuit of this project, the nursing discipline has proposed various conceptualizations of knowledge. The one developed by Chinn and Kramer, following Carper&#8217;s work, is without doubt the most prominent and most often borrowed concept in discussing the epistemological foundations of the discipline. This thoughtful article proposes an in-depth critical analysis of this theoretical development by focusing on &#8220;personal&#8221; and &#8220;esthetic&#8221; knowledge. As part of the analysis, the author scrutinizes the inherent logics that support these patterns of knowing. Finally, the author highlights some overinterpretations and discrepancies with regard to nursing practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers\",\"volume\":\"144 1\",\"pages\":\"44-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.144.0044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.144.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

每一门学科都在发展和传播一种知识。在追求这个项目,护理学科提出了各种概念的知识。Chinn和Kramer在carper的工作之后提出的概念,无疑是讨论该学科的认识论基础时最突出和最常被借用的概念。这篇深思熟虑的文章提出了对这一理论发展的深入批判性分析,重点关注个人”和& # 8220;审美# 8221;知识。作为分析的一部分,作者仔细审视了支持这些认知模式的内在逻辑。最后,作者强调了一些关于护理实践的过度解释和差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Des modes de savoir pour affirmer une épistémologie disciplinaire infirmière : des surinterprétations et réductions dans les travaux de Chinn et Kramer.

Every academic discipline nurturing its own science draws on the development and dissemination of a knowledge. In pursuit of this project, the nursing discipline has proposed various conceptualizations of knowledge. The one developed by Chinn and Kramer, following Carper’s work, is without doubt the most prominent and most often borrowed concept in discussing the epistemological foundations of the discipline. This thoughtful article proposes an in-depth critical analysis of this theoretical development by focusing on “personal” and “esthetic” knowledge. As part of the analysis, the author scrutinizes the inherent logics that support these patterns of knowing. Finally, the author highlights some overinterpretations and discrepancies with regard to nursing practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信