利用妊娠期调整投影法预测胎儿头围。

Michelle N Lende, Ariana G Munger, Craig M Zelig
{"title":"利用妊娠期调整投影法预测胎儿头围。","authors":"Michelle N Lende,&nbsp;Ariana G Munger,&nbsp;Craig M Zelig","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2021.1926450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine if the gestation adjusted projection (GAP) method applied to a fetal head circumference (FHC) measured on ultrasound between 32 and 36 weeks and 6 days gestation can predict birth head circumference, specifically ≥ 35 cm, which is a known risk factor for Cesarean.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective chart review of 60 pregnancies from January to December 2019. Eligible patients delivered a singleton term neonate and received two ultrasounds, one at 32-36 weeks and 6 days gestation (period 1) and a second within 7 days of a term birth (period 2). Fetal head circumference was predicted two ways, by applying (1) the GAP method to the period 1 ultrasound and (2) by direct measurement with a period 2 ultrasound. These estimates were compared to the birth head circumference (HC<sub>BIRTH</sub>) by measures of error and with paired <i>t</i>-tests. McNemar's test compared the ability to predict head circumference (HC) ≥ 35 cm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the measures of error were significantly different between the GAP and the period 2 ultrasound, including the ability to predict HC ≥ 35 cm. In patients who delivered at ≥ 39 weeks, the period 2 ultrasound performed poorly while the GAP's performance remained good.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GAP method applied to an early third trimester ultrasound predicts HC<sub>BIRTH</sub> with accuracy similar to an ultrasound performed seven days from delivery and may be superior for deliveries ≥ 39 weeks. The ability to predict HC<sub>BIRTH</sub> could improve clinical management of affected pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520807,"journal":{"name":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","volume":" ","pages":"6836-6840"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1926450","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of gestation adjusted projection method for predicting fetal head circumference.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle N Lende,&nbsp;Ariana G Munger,&nbsp;Craig M Zelig\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2021.1926450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine if the gestation adjusted projection (GAP) method applied to a fetal head circumference (FHC) measured on ultrasound between 32 and 36 weeks and 6 days gestation can predict birth head circumference, specifically ≥ 35 cm, which is a known risk factor for Cesarean.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective chart review of 60 pregnancies from January to December 2019. Eligible patients delivered a singleton term neonate and received two ultrasounds, one at 32-36 weeks and 6 days gestation (period 1) and a second within 7 days of a term birth (period 2). Fetal head circumference was predicted two ways, by applying (1) the GAP method to the period 1 ultrasound and (2) by direct measurement with a period 2 ultrasound. These estimates were compared to the birth head circumference (HC<sub>BIRTH</sub>) by measures of error and with paired <i>t</i>-tests. McNemar's test compared the ability to predict head circumference (HC) ≥ 35 cm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the measures of error were significantly different between the GAP and the period 2 ultrasound, including the ability to predict HC ≥ 35 cm. In patients who delivered at ≥ 39 weeks, the period 2 ultrasound performed poorly while the GAP's performance remained good.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GAP method applied to an early third trimester ultrasound predicts HC<sub>BIRTH</sub> with accuracy similar to an ultrasound performed seven days from delivery and may be superior for deliveries ≥ 39 weeks. The ability to predict HC<sub>BIRTH</sub> could improve clinical management of affected pregnancies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6836-6840\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1926450\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1926450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1926450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定妊娠调整投影(GAP)方法应用于妊娠32 ~ 36周和6天超声测量的胎儿头围(FHC)是否可以预测出生头围,特别是≥35 cm,这是已知的剖宫产的危险因素。方法:对2019年1月至12月60例妊娠进行回顾性图表分析。符合条件的患者分娩了一名单胎足月新生儿,并接受了两次超声检查,一次在妊娠32-36周6天(第1期),另一次在足月分娩后7天内(第2期)。通过两种方法预测胎儿头围,(1)应用GAP方法进行第1期超声检查,(2)使用第2期超声直接测量。这些估计值通过误差测量和配对t检验与出生头围(HCBIRTH)进行比较。McNemar试验比较了预测头围(HC)≥35 cm的能力。结果:GAP和第2期超声在预测HC≥35 cm的能力方面均无显著差异。在分娩≥39周的患者中,第2期超声表现不佳,而GAP表现良好。结论:GAP方法应用于妊娠晚期早期超声预测HCBIRTH的准确性与分娩后7天的超声预测相似,对于分娩≥39周的超声预测可能更好。预测HCBIRTH的能力可以改善受影响妊娠的临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of gestation adjusted projection method for predicting fetal head circumference.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine if the gestation adjusted projection (GAP) method applied to a fetal head circumference (FHC) measured on ultrasound between 32 and 36 weeks and 6 days gestation can predict birth head circumference, specifically ≥ 35 cm, which is a known risk factor for Cesarean.

Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of 60 pregnancies from January to December 2019. Eligible patients delivered a singleton term neonate and received two ultrasounds, one at 32-36 weeks and 6 days gestation (period 1) and a second within 7 days of a term birth (period 2). Fetal head circumference was predicted two ways, by applying (1) the GAP method to the period 1 ultrasound and (2) by direct measurement with a period 2 ultrasound. These estimates were compared to the birth head circumference (HCBIRTH) by measures of error and with paired t-tests. McNemar's test compared the ability to predict head circumference (HC) ≥ 35 cm.

Results: None of the measures of error were significantly different between the GAP and the period 2 ultrasound, including the ability to predict HC ≥ 35 cm. In patients who delivered at ≥ 39 weeks, the period 2 ultrasound performed poorly while the GAP's performance remained good.

Conclusion: The GAP method applied to an early third trimester ultrasound predicts HCBIRTH with accuracy similar to an ultrasound performed seven days from delivery and may be superior for deliveries ≥ 39 weeks. The ability to predict HCBIRTH could improve clinical management of affected pregnancies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信