完全性全肺切除术治疗第二原发性/原发性肺癌和局部复发肺癌。

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-05 DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.063
Naofumi Miyahara, Kazuhito Nii, Alberto Benazzo, Akinori Iwasaki, Walter Klepetko, Konrad Hoetzenecker
{"title":"完全性全肺切除术治疗第二原发性/原发性肺癌和局部复发肺癌。","authors":"Naofumi Miyahara,&nbsp;Kazuhito Nii,&nbsp;Alberto Benazzo,&nbsp;Akinori Iwasaki,&nbsp;Walter Klepetko,&nbsp;Konrad Hoetzenecker","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Completion pneumonectomy (CP) for second primary/primary lung cancer (SPLC) and local recurrence lung cancer (LRLC) is still controversial. Although several case series on such a practice exist, the oncological benefit is under debate. The purpose of this study was to review available literatures on CP for SPLC and LRLC and evaluate postoperative and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were reviewed for eligible studies in January 2021. Studies were included if they indicated outcomes of patients with lung cancer undergoing CP. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included operative morbidity and 30-day mortality. Random-effects meta-analysis based on a binomial distribution was used to create pooled estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two eligible studies including 1157 patients were identified. These studies were uniformly retrospective reports. Pooled estimates for 3-year and 5-year OS were 50.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.7%-66.5%) and 38.9% (95% CI, 32.2%-46.1%) in SPLC patients. When the SPLC was a stage I tumor, pooled 5-year OS was favorable with 60.7% (95% CI, 43.2%-75.9%). In LRLC, pooled 3-year and 5-year OS were 47.6% (95% CI, 36.1%-59.4%) and 33.8% (95% CI, 26.8%-41.5%), respectively. Pooled morbidity and 30-day mortality was reported in 38.2% (95% CI, 32.0%-44.9%), and 10.0% (95% CI, 8.1%-12.3%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CP for SPLC and LRLC is a challenging procedure with significant perioperative morbimortality. However, published evidence indicates good long-term survival for selected patients. Further studies are needed to identify patient subgroups which benefit most from CP.</p>","PeriodicalId":501669,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1073-1083"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.063","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Completion Pneumonectomy for Second Primary/Primary Lung Cancer and Local Recurrence Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Naofumi Miyahara,&nbsp;Kazuhito Nii,&nbsp;Alberto Benazzo,&nbsp;Akinori Iwasaki,&nbsp;Walter Klepetko,&nbsp;Konrad Hoetzenecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Completion pneumonectomy (CP) for second primary/primary lung cancer (SPLC) and local recurrence lung cancer (LRLC) is still controversial. Although several case series on such a practice exist, the oncological benefit is under debate. The purpose of this study was to review available literatures on CP for SPLC and LRLC and evaluate postoperative and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were reviewed for eligible studies in January 2021. Studies were included if they indicated outcomes of patients with lung cancer undergoing CP. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included operative morbidity and 30-day mortality. Random-effects meta-analysis based on a binomial distribution was used to create pooled estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two eligible studies including 1157 patients were identified. These studies were uniformly retrospective reports. Pooled estimates for 3-year and 5-year OS were 50.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.7%-66.5%) and 38.9% (95% CI, 32.2%-46.1%) in SPLC patients. When the SPLC was a stage I tumor, pooled 5-year OS was favorable with 60.7% (95% CI, 43.2%-75.9%). In LRLC, pooled 3-year and 5-year OS were 47.6% (95% CI, 36.1%-59.4%) and 33.8% (95% CI, 26.8%-41.5%), respectively. Pooled morbidity and 30-day mortality was reported in 38.2% (95% CI, 32.0%-44.9%), and 10.0% (95% CI, 8.1%-12.3%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CP for SPLC and LRLC is a challenging procedure with significant perioperative morbimortality. However, published evidence indicates good long-term survival for selected patients. Further studies are needed to identify patient subgroups which benefit most from CP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1073-1083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.063\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:完全性全肺切除术(CP)治疗第二原发性/原发性肺癌(SPLC)和局部复发肺癌(LRLC)仍存在争议。尽管存在一些关于这种做法的案例系列,但其肿瘤益处仍在争论中。本研究的目的是回顾关于SPLC和LRLC的CP的现有文献,并评估术后和长期预后。方法:在2021年1月检索MEDLINE、SCOPUS和Web of Science中符合条件的研究。如果研究表明肺癌患者接受CP的结局,则纳入研究。总生存期(OS)被定义为主要终点;次要终点包括手术发病率和30天死亡率。基于二项分布的随机效应荟萃分析用于创建汇总估计。结果:纳入32项符合条件的研究,包括1157例患者。这些研究均为回顾性报告。SPLC患者3年和5年OS的汇总估计分别为50.6%(95%可信区间[CI], 34.7%-66.5%)和38.9% (95% CI, 32.2%-46.1%)。当SPLC为I期肿瘤时,5年总生存率为60.7% (95% CI, 43.2%-75.9%)。在LRLC中,3年和5年总OS分别为47.6% (95% CI, 36.1%-59.4%)和33.8% (95% CI, 26.8%-41.5%)。合并发病率和30天死亡率分别为38.2% (95% CI, 32.0%-44.9%)和10.0% (95% CI, 8.1%-12.3%)。结论:对于SPLC和LRLC的CP是一项具有挑战性的手术,其围手术期死亡率很高。然而,已发表的证据表明,选定的患者有良好的长期生存率。需要进一步的研究来确定从CP中获益最多的患者亚组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Completion Pneumonectomy for Second Primary/Primary Lung Cancer and Local Recurrence Lung Cancer.

Background: Completion pneumonectomy (CP) for second primary/primary lung cancer (SPLC) and local recurrence lung cancer (LRLC) is still controversial. Although several case series on such a practice exist, the oncological benefit is under debate. The purpose of this study was to review available literatures on CP for SPLC and LRLC and evaluate postoperative and long-term outcomes.

Methods: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were reviewed for eligible studies in January 2021. Studies were included if they indicated outcomes of patients with lung cancer undergoing CP. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included operative morbidity and 30-day mortality. Random-effects meta-analysis based on a binomial distribution was used to create pooled estimates.

Results: Thirty-two eligible studies including 1157 patients were identified. These studies were uniformly retrospective reports. Pooled estimates for 3-year and 5-year OS were 50.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.7%-66.5%) and 38.9% (95% CI, 32.2%-46.1%) in SPLC patients. When the SPLC was a stage I tumor, pooled 5-year OS was favorable with 60.7% (95% CI, 43.2%-75.9%). In LRLC, pooled 3-year and 5-year OS were 47.6% (95% CI, 36.1%-59.4%) and 33.8% (95% CI, 26.8%-41.5%), respectively. Pooled morbidity and 30-day mortality was reported in 38.2% (95% CI, 32.0%-44.9%), and 10.0% (95% CI, 8.1%-12.3%), respectively.

Conclusions: CP for SPLC and LRLC is a challenging procedure with significant perioperative morbimortality. However, published evidence indicates good long-term survival for selected patients. Further studies are needed to identify patient subgroups which benefit most from CP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信