使用检查表评估经胫骨假体的满意度。

Erwin C Baars, Jan H Geertzen, Pieter U Dijkstra
{"title":"使用检查表评估经胫骨假体的满意度。","authors":"Erwin C Baars,&nbsp;Jan H Geertzen,&nbsp;Pieter U Dijkstra","doi":"10.2340/20030711-1000057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess satisfaction of prosthesis users with their prostheses, and the problems they experience with the residual limb, using a checklist, in order to evaluate potential benefits of checklist use and to summarize issues and problems with the prosthesis and/or residual limb presented by prosthesis users.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Participants were adult trans-tibial prosthesis users (<i>n</i> = 82) and certified prosthetist orthotist (<i>n</i> = 19) experienced in fitting lower-limb prostheses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prosthesis users reported their reasons for consultation and factors concerning prosthesis (dis)satisfaction and residual limb problems, using a checklist. Checklist use was evaluated by certified prosthetist orthotists and prosthesis users and the significance of evaluation scores was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Checklist use identified 126 issues/problems, most of which concerned prosthesis fit (33%) and pressure points on the residual limb skin (26%). Evaluation scores were significantly higher than neutral regarding the checklist helping the certified prosthetist orthotist to gather more information and to make clear with which issues the prosthesis user was dissatisfied. Prosthesis users reported that checklist use made them feel more understood by the certified prosthetist orthotist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Checklist use in the assessment of trans-tibial prostheses is beneficial in identifying factors related to dissatisfaction, and improves the quality of certified prosthetist orthotists' consultation. The implementation of checklist use is, however, challenging.</p>","PeriodicalId":73929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6d/07/JRMCC-4-1000057.PMC8091939.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHECKLIST USE FOR ASSESSMENT OF SATISFACTION WITH TRANS-TIBIAL PROSTHESES.\",\"authors\":\"Erwin C Baars,&nbsp;Jan H Geertzen,&nbsp;Pieter U Dijkstra\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/20030711-1000057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess satisfaction of prosthesis users with their prostheses, and the problems they experience with the residual limb, using a checklist, in order to evaluate potential benefits of checklist use and to summarize issues and problems with the prosthesis and/or residual limb presented by prosthesis users.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Participants were adult trans-tibial prosthesis users (<i>n</i> = 82) and certified prosthetist orthotist (<i>n</i> = 19) experienced in fitting lower-limb prostheses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prosthesis users reported their reasons for consultation and factors concerning prosthesis (dis)satisfaction and residual limb problems, using a checklist. Checklist use was evaluated by certified prosthetist orthotists and prosthesis users and the significance of evaluation scores was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Checklist use identified 126 issues/problems, most of which concerned prosthesis fit (33%) and pressure points on the residual limb skin (26%). Evaluation scores were significantly higher than neutral regarding the checklist helping the certified prosthetist orthotist to gather more information and to make clear with which issues the prosthesis user was dissatisfied. Prosthesis users reported that checklist use made them feel more understood by the certified prosthetist orthotist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Checklist use in the assessment of trans-tibial prostheses is beneficial in identifying factors related to dissatisfaction, and improves the quality of certified prosthetist orthotists' consultation. The implementation of checklist use is, however, challenging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6d/07/JRMCC-4-1000057.PMC8091939.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/20030711-1000057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/20030711-1000057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用检查表评估义肢使用者对义肢的满意度,以及他们在残肢方面遇到的问题,以评估使用检查表的潜在益处,并总结义肢使用者在义肢和/或残肢方面遇到的问题。设计:横断面研究。对象:参与者为成年经胫骨假体使用者(n = 82)和具有下肢假体装配经验的认证假体矫形师(n = 19)。方法:义肢使用者使用检查表报告问诊原因、义肢满意度及残肢问题的影响因素。通过认证义肢矫形师和义肢使用者对检查表的使用情况进行评估,并确定评估分数的意义。结果:使用检查表确定了126个问题,其中大部分涉及假体贴合(33%)和残肢皮肤压力点(26%)。评估分数显著高于中立,关于检查表帮助认证义肢矫形师收集更多信息,并明确哪些问题是义肢使用者不满意的。义肢使用者报告说,使用检查表使他们感到更容易被认证义肢矫形师理解。结论:将检查表应用于胫骨假体评估中,有助于识别患者不满意的相关因素,提高认证义肢矫形师的咨询质量。然而,使用检查表的实现是具有挑战性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

CHECKLIST USE FOR ASSESSMENT OF SATISFACTION WITH TRANS-TIBIAL PROSTHESES.

CHECKLIST USE FOR ASSESSMENT OF SATISFACTION WITH TRANS-TIBIAL PROSTHESES.

Objective: To assess satisfaction of prosthesis users with their prostheses, and the problems they experience with the residual limb, using a checklist, in order to evaluate potential benefits of checklist use and to summarize issues and problems with the prosthesis and/or residual limb presented by prosthesis users.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Subjects: Participants were adult trans-tibial prosthesis users (n = 82) and certified prosthetist orthotist (n = 19) experienced in fitting lower-limb prostheses.

Methods: Prosthesis users reported their reasons for consultation and factors concerning prosthesis (dis)satisfaction and residual limb problems, using a checklist. Checklist use was evaluated by certified prosthetist orthotists and prosthesis users and the significance of evaluation scores was determined.

Results: Checklist use identified 126 issues/problems, most of which concerned prosthesis fit (33%) and pressure points on the residual limb skin (26%). Evaluation scores were significantly higher than neutral regarding the checklist helping the certified prosthetist orthotist to gather more information and to make clear with which issues the prosthesis user was dissatisfied. Prosthesis users reported that checklist use made them feel more understood by the certified prosthetist orthotist.

Conclusion: Checklist use in the assessment of trans-tibial prostheses is beneficial in identifying factors related to dissatisfaction, and improves the quality of certified prosthetist orthotists' consultation. The implementation of checklist use is, however, challenging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信