病理性忧虑者的信息加工和决策及其在广泛性焦虑障碍机制中的潜在作用。

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Advances in Cognitive Psychology Pub Date : 2020-10-19 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.5709/acp-0308-7
Jacek Gierus
{"title":"病理性忧虑者的信息加工和决策及其在广泛性焦虑障碍机制中的潜在作用。","authors":"Jacek Gierus","doi":"10.5709/acp-0308-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systematic information processing and decision-making under uncertainty are key constructs of new conceptions explaining the severity of pathological worry. The current study attempted to analyze their usefulness in subclinical and clinical groups. In the first phase of the study (<i>N</i> = 251) participants were examined with the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), a GP consultationrelated survey, and a screening survey for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). In the second phase (<i>N</i> = 220), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the PSWQ, and tasks measuring systematic information processing (SIP) versus heuristic reasoning (HR) were applied. In the third phase (<i>N</i> = 60), GAD (<i>n</i> = 30) and healthy control (n = 30) groups were examined with the above methods and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). In the low risk group, a relationship between mood and the representativeness heuristic (<i>ρ</i> = 0.50), as well as anchoring and adjustment heuristic (anxiety-related stimuli) was found (<i>ρ</i> = -0.53). In the GAD group, significant correlations between the PSWQ score, the IGT loss avoidance score (<i>ρ</i> = 0.40), and total IGT score (<i>ρ</i> = 0.48) were found. The results did not confirm a particular usefulness of the systematic/heuristic information processing construct in subclinical and clinical groups. Theory-consistent results were rather found in the nonclinical groups. Nevertheless, the data revealed some interesting findings supporting potential explanatory power of some theoretical models.</p>","PeriodicalId":51754,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/15/acp-16-4-311.PMC8085684.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Processing and Decision-Making in Pathological Worriers and their Potential Role in Mechanisms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Jacek Gierus\",\"doi\":\"10.5709/acp-0308-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Systematic information processing and decision-making under uncertainty are key constructs of new conceptions explaining the severity of pathological worry. The current study attempted to analyze their usefulness in subclinical and clinical groups. In the first phase of the study (<i>N</i> = 251) participants were examined with the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), a GP consultationrelated survey, and a screening survey for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). In the second phase (<i>N</i> = 220), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the PSWQ, and tasks measuring systematic information processing (SIP) versus heuristic reasoning (HR) were applied. In the third phase (<i>N</i> = 60), GAD (<i>n</i> = 30) and healthy control (n = 30) groups were examined with the above methods and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). In the low risk group, a relationship between mood and the representativeness heuristic (<i>ρ</i> = 0.50), as well as anchoring and adjustment heuristic (anxiety-related stimuli) was found (<i>ρ</i> = -0.53). In the GAD group, significant correlations between the PSWQ score, the IGT loss avoidance score (<i>ρ</i> = 0.40), and total IGT score (<i>ρ</i> = 0.48) were found. The results did not confirm a particular usefulness of the systematic/heuristic information processing construct in subclinical and clinical groups. Theory-consistent results were rather found in the nonclinical groups. Nevertheless, the data revealed some interesting findings supporting potential explanatory power of some theoretical models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/15/acp-16-4-311.PMC8085684.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0308-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0308-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

不确定性下的系统信息处理和决策是解释病理性忧虑严重性新概念的关键构建。目前的研究试图分析它们在亚临床组和临床组中的有效性。在研究的第一阶段(N = 251)参与者接受了宾夕法尼亚州立大学焦虑问卷(PSWQ)、全科医生咨询相关调查和广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)筛查调查。在第二阶段(N = 220),采用状态-特质焦虑量表、PSWQ和系统信息处理(SIP)与启发式推理(HR)的任务测量。在第三阶段(N = 60), GAD组(N = 30)和健康对照组(N = 30)采用上述方法和爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)进行检查。在低风险组中,情绪与代表性启发式(ρ = 0.50)以及锚定和调整启发式(焦虑相关刺激)之间存在关系(ρ = -0.53)。在GAD组中,PSWQ评分、IGT损失避免评分(ρ = 0.40)和总IGT评分(ρ = 0.48)之间存在显著相关性。结果并没有证实系统/启发式信息处理结构在亚临床组和临床组中的特别有用性。在非临床组中发现了与理论一致的结果。然而,数据揭示了一些有趣的发现,支持一些理论模型的潜在解释力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Information Processing and Decision-Making in Pathological Worriers and their Potential Role in Mechanisms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

Information Processing and Decision-Making in Pathological Worriers and their Potential Role in Mechanisms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

Information Processing and Decision-Making in Pathological Worriers and their Potential Role in Mechanisms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

Information Processing and Decision-Making in Pathological Worriers and their Potential Role in Mechanisms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

Systematic information processing and decision-making under uncertainty are key constructs of new conceptions explaining the severity of pathological worry. The current study attempted to analyze their usefulness in subclinical and clinical groups. In the first phase of the study (N = 251) participants were examined with the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), a GP consultationrelated survey, and a screening survey for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). In the second phase (N = 220), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the PSWQ, and tasks measuring systematic information processing (SIP) versus heuristic reasoning (HR) were applied. In the third phase (N = 60), GAD (n = 30) and healthy control (n = 30) groups were examined with the above methods and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). In the low risk group, a relationship between mood and the representativeness heuristic (ρ = 0.50), as well as anchoring and adjustment heuristic (anxiety-related stimuli) was found (ρ = -0.53). In the GAD group, significant correlations between the PSWQ score, the IGT loss avoidance score (ρ = 0.40), and total IGT score (ρ = 0.48) were found. The results did not confirm a particular usefulness of the systematic/heuristic information processing construct in subclinical and clinical groups. Theory-consistent results were rather found in the nonclinical groups. Nevertheless, the data revealed some interesting findings supporting potential explanatory power of some theoretical models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Cognitive Psychology
Advances in Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信