确保安全区域远程医疗模式的关键考虑因素:系统回顾。

Siggy Haveland, Shahidul Islam
{"title":"确保安全区域远程医疗模式的关键考虑因素:系统回顾。","authors":"Siggy Haveland, Shahidul Islam","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2020.0580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\n <b>\n <i>Background:</i>\n </b>\n <i>This literature review sets out to increase the knowledge on patient safety within the telehealth modality of care, to inform the relevant local health service departments on the key considerations to minimize patient harm.</i>\n <b>\n <i>Methods:</i>\n </b>\n <i>A systematic search in Medline and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google Scholar, and the University of New England (UNE) Library Search was conducted. A combination of key terms \"Telehealth\" OR \"Telecare\" OR \"Telemedicine\" AND \"patient safety\" AND \"rural\" was used. Based on the screening and eligibility criteria, 21 peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2015 and 2020 were included in the review.</i>\n <b>\n <i>Results and Discussion:</i>\n </b>\n <i>On evaluating the included studies, three main themes and various corresponding subthemes emerged. The main themes were that of telehealth experience (TE), telehealth outcomes (TO), and telehealth risks (TR), with the corresponding subthemes of telehealth experience from a patient perspective (TE-PT), telehealth experience from a carer perspective (TE-CR), telehealth experience from a clinician perspective (TE-CN), positive telehealth (TO-P), and negative telehealth outcomes (TO-N), and patient (TR-PT) and clinician telehealth risks (TR-CN).</i>\n <b>\n <i>Conclusions:</i>\n </b>\n <i>The results suggest that patients generally have positive experiences and are accepting telehealth as a modality of care. Furthermore, patient outcomes appear to be comparable with in-person care, with additional benefits of lower costs to both the service and patients.</i>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"602-612"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key Considerations in Ensuring a Safe Regional Telehealth Care Model: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Siggy Haveland, Shahidul Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2020.0580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>\\n <b>\\n <i>Background:</i>\\n </b>\\n <i>This literature review sets out to increase the knowledge on patient safety within the telehealth modality of care, to inform the relevant local health service departments on the key considerations to minimize patient harm.</i>\\n <b>\\n <i>Methods:</i>\\n </b>\\n <i>A systematic search in Medline and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google Scholar, and the University of New England (UNE) Library Search was conducted. A combination of key terms \\\"Telehealth\\\" OR \\\"Telecare\\\" OR \\\"Telemedicine\\\" AND \\\"patient safety\\\" AND \\\"rural\\\" was used. Based on the screening and eligibility criteria, 21 peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2015 and 2020 were included in the review.</i>\\n <b>\\n <i>Results and Discussion:</i>\\n </b>\\n <i>On evaluating the included studies, three main themes and various corresponding subthemes emerged. The main themes were that of telehealth experience (TE), telehealth outcomes (TO), and telehealth risks (TR), with the corresponding subthemes of telehealth experience from a patient perspective (TE-PT), telehealth experience from a carer perspective (TE-CR), telehealth experience from a clinician perspective (TE-CN), positive telehealth (TO-P), and negative telehealth outcomes (TO-N), and patient (TR-PT) and clinician telehealth risks (TR-CN).</i>\\n <b>\\n <i>Conclusions:</i>\\n </b>\\n <i>The results suggest that patients generally have positive experiences and are accepting telehealth as a modality of care. Furthermore, patient outcomes appear to be comparable with in-person care, with additional benefits of lower costs to both the service and patients.</i>\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"602-612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本文献综述旨在提高远程医疗护理方式中患者安全方面的知识,告知相关地方卫生服务部门减少患者伤害的关键考虑因素。方法:系统检索Medline、chinese journal Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)、谷歌Scholar、New England University Library search (UNE)。使用了“远程保健”、“远程医疗”或“远程医疗”、“患者安全”和“农村”等关键词的组合。根据筛选和资格标准,2015年至2020年期间发表的21篇英文同行评议文章被纳入评审。结果与讨论:在评价纳入的研究时,出现了三个主要主题和各种相应的副主题。主要主题为远程医疗体验(TE)、远程医疗结果(TO)和远程医疗风险(TR),相应的子主题为患者视角的远程医疗体验(TE- pt)、护理者视角的远程医疗体验(TE- cr)、临床医生视角的远程医疗体验(TE- cn)、积极远程医疗结果(TO- p)和消极远程医疗结果(TO- n),以及患者(TR- pt)和临床医生远程医疗风险(TR- cn)。结论:结果表明,患者普遍有积极的经验,并接受远程医疗作为一种模式的护理。此外,患者的结果似乎与亲自护理相当,对服务和患者都有更低成本的额外好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key Considerations in Ensuring a Safe Regional Telehealth Care Model: A Systematic Review.

Background: This literature review sets out to increase the knowledge on patient safety within the telehealth modality of care, to inform the relevant local health service departments on the key considerations to minimize patient harm. Methods: A systematic search in Medline and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google Scholar, and the University of New England (UNE) Library Search was conducted. A combination of key terms "Telehealth" OR "Telecare" OR "Telemedicine" AND "patient safety" AND "rural" was used. Based on the screening and eligibility criteria, 21 peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2015 and 2020 were included in the review. Results and Discussion: On evaluating the included studies, three main themes and various corresponding subthemes emerged. The main themes were that of telehealth experience (TE), telehealth outcomes (TO), and telehealth risks (TR), with the corresponding subthemes of telehealth experience from a patient perspective (TE-PT), telehealth experience from a carer perspective (TE-CR), telehealth experience from a clinician perspective (TE-CN), positive telehealth (TO-P), and negative telehealth outcomes (TO-N), and patient (TR-PT) and clinician telehealth risks (TR-CN). Conclusions: The results suggest that patients generally have positive experiences and are accepting telehealth as a modality of care. Furthermore, patient outcomes appear to be comparable with in-person care, with additional benefits of lower costs to both the service and patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信