Jeffrey C L Looi, Stephen Allison, Tarun Bastiampillai, Stephen R Kisely
{"title":"澳大利亚青年心理健康网络Headspace:加拿大心理保健的经验教训。","authors":"Jeffrey C L Looi, Stephen Allison, Tarun Bastiampillai, Stephen R Kisely","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe political advocacy and scientific debate about headspace, a non-governmental organisational (NGO) substantially funded by the Australian federal government that has significantly impacted the youth mental healthcare landscape. Access Open Minds is a Canadian clinical research initiative for youth mental health partially based on headspace. Lessons from the Australian experience may thus prove useful for Canadian stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Australian healthcare system, mental health policy and governance for youth mental healthcare are contextually described. The structure and promulgation of the headspace NGO is detailed, as a parallel provider of primary mental healthcare outside of existing public and private mental health services. A review of the existing research on the evaluation of headspace was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Headspace has expanded rapidly due to successful political advocacy on behalf of the youth early intervention model, with limited coordination in terms of governance, planning and implementation with existing mental health services. In spite of consuming considerable resources, there has been limited evidence of effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Canadians should be wary of large youth programs that operate outside mainstream mental healthcare because of similar dangers such as poor co-ordination with existing government-funded services, duplication of care, the substantial consumption of resources, and limited evaluation of outcomes. As Access Open Minds is a clinical research project, there is the opportunity for Canada to evaluate the efficacy of the model before further adoption by governments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47053,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":"30 2","pages":"116-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056954/pdf/ccap30_p0116.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Headspace, an Australian Youth Mental Health Network: Lessons for Canadian Mental Healthcare.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey C L Looi, Stephen Allison, Tarun Bastiampillai, Stephen R Kisely\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe political advocacy and scientific debate about headspace, a non-governmental organisational (NGO) substantially funded by the Australian federal government that has significantly impacted the youth mental healthcare landscape. Access Open Minds is a Canadian clinical research initiative for youth mental health partially based on headspace. Lessons from the Australian experience may thus prove useful for Canadian stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Australian healthcare system, mental health policy and governance for youth mental healthcare are contextually described. The structure and promulgation of the headspace NGO is detailed, as a parallel provider of primary mental healthcare outside of existing public and private mental health services. A review of the existing research on the evaluation of headspace was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Headspace has expanded rapidly due to successful political advocacy on behalf of the youth early intervention model, with limited coordination in terms of governance, planning and implementation with existing mental health services. In spite of consuming considerable resources, there has been limited evidence of effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Canadians should be wary of large youth programs that operate outside mainstream mental healthcare because of similar dangers such as poor co-ordination with existing government-funded services, duplication of care, the substantial consumption of resources, and limited evaluation of outcomes. As Access Open Minds is a clinical research project, there is the opportunity for Canada to evaluate the efficacy of the model before further adoption by governments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"116-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056954/pdf/ccap30_p0116.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:描述关于头部空间的政治倡导和科学辩论,这是一个由澳大利亚联邦政府大量资助的非政府组织(NGO),对青少年心理保健领域产生了重大影响。开放思想是加拿大针对青年心理健康的一项临床研究倡议,部分基于头顶空间。因此,澳大利亚的经验教训可能对加拿大的利益相关者有用。方法:澳大利亚的医疗保健系统,心理健康政策和治理的青少年心理健康是上下文描述。详细介绍了headspace非政府组织的结构和颁布情况,作为现有公共和私人精神卫生服务之外的平行初级精神卫生保健提供者。综述了国内外对顶空评价的研究现状。结果:由于代表青年早期干预模式的成功政治宣传,在治理、规划和实施方面与现有精神卫生服务的协调有限,“顶空”迅速扩大。尽管耗费了大量资源,但有效性的证据有限。结论:加拿大人应该警惕在主流精神卫生保健之外运作的大型青少年项目,因为存在类似的危险,如与现有政府资助的服务协调不佳、重复护理、大量消耗资源和结果评估有限。由于Access Open Minds是一个临床研究项目,加拿大有机会在政府进一步采用该模式之前评估其有效性。
Headspace, an Australian Youth Mental Health Network: Lessons for Canadian Mental Healthcare.
Objective: To describe political advocacy and scientific debate about headspace, a non-governmental organisational (NGO) substantially funded by the Australian federal government that has significantly impacted the youth mental healthcare landscape. Access Open Minds is a Canadian clinical research initiative for youth mental health partially based on headspace. Lessons from the Australian experience may thus prove useful for Canadian stakeholders.
Method: The Australian healthcare system, mental health policy and governance for youth mental healthcare are contextually described. The structure and promulgation of the headspace NGO is detailed, as a parallel provider of primary mental healthcare outside of existing public and private mental health services. A review of the existing research on the evaluation of headspace was conducted.
Results: Headspace has expanded rapidly due to successful political advocacy on behalf of the youth early intervention model, with limited coordination in terms of governance, planning and implementation with existing mental health services. In spite of consuming considerable resources, there has been limited evidence of effectiveness.
Conclusions: Canadians should be wary of large youth programs that operate outside mainstream mental healthcare because of similar dangers such as poor co-ordination with existing government-funded services, duplication of care, the substantial consumption of resources, and limited evaluation of outcomes. As Access Open Minds is a clinical research project, there is the opportunity for Canada to evaluate the efficacy of the model before further adoption by governments.