用于下肢三维步态分析的低成本网络摄像头记录系统的可靠性。

Q2 Medicine
Apiwan Pusara, Sumet Heamawatanachai, Komsak Sinsurin, Chaiyong Jorrakate
{"title":"用于下肢三维步态分析的低成本网络摄像头记录系统的可靠性。","authors":"Apiwan Pusara,&nbsp;Sumet Heamawatanachai,&nbsp;Komsak Sinsurin,&nbsp;Chaiyong Jorrakate","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2019.1671221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purposes of this study were to develop and evaluate the test-retest reliability of a specific low-cost three-dimensional webcam recording system (3D-WCRS) and compare its reliability to a standard motion analysis system. Twenty healthy volunteers comprised of 5 males and 15 females with a mean age of 22.90 years and mean BMI of 22.72 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were investigated for angles of hip, knee and ankle joints in three planes while walking at a self-selected speed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate as well as compare the test-retest reliability of the 3D-WCRS and standard motion analysis system. Standard error of measurement (SEM) was also analyzed for the purposes of the study. The results exhibited excellent test-retest reliability for the 3D-WCRS (ICCs ranged between 0.93 and 0.99, p = 0.001) in the three joints and planes. The standard motion analysis system demonstrated excellent reliability for all joints and planes (ICCs ranged between 0.99 and 1.00, p = 0.001). Minimal SEM values were observed in both the 3D-WCRS and standard motion analysis systems. Therefore, the developed low-cost 3D-WCRS exhibits good to excellent test-retest reliability. The test-retest reliability of the 3D-WCRS is likely to be comparable to a standard motion analysis system.</p>","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"6 1","pages":"85-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2019.1671221","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Apiwan Pusara,&nbsp;Sumet Heamawatanachai,&nbsp;Komsak Sinsurin,&nbsp;Chaiyong Jorrakate\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23335432.2019.1671221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purposes of this study were to develop and evaluate the test-retest reliability of a specific low-cost three-dimensional webcam recording system (3D-WCRS) and compare its reliability to a standard motion analysis system. Twenty healthy volunteers comprised of 5 males and 15 females with a mean age of 22.90 years and mean BMI of 22.72 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were investigated for angles of hip, knee and ankle joints in three planes while walking at a self-selected speed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate as well as compare the test-retest reliability of the 3D-WCRS and standard motion analysis system. Standard error of measurement (SEM) was also analyzed for the purposes of the study. The results exhibited excellent test-retest reliability for the 3D-WCRS (ICCs ranged between 0.93 and 0.99, p = 0.001) in the three joints and planes. The standard motion analysis system demonstrated excellent reliability for all joints and planes (ICCs ranged between 0.99 and 1.00, p = 0.001). Minimal SEM values were observed in both the 3D-WCRS and standard motion analysis systems. Therefore, the developed low-cost 3D-WCRS exhibits good to excellent test-retest reliability. The test-retest reliability of the 3D-WCRS is likely to be comparable to a standard motion analysis system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"85-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2019.1671221\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2019.1671221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2019.1671221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究的目的是开发和评估一种特定的低成本三维网络摄像头记录系统(3D-WCRS)的重测可靠性,并将其与标准运动分析系统的可靠性进行比较。研究了20名健康志愿者,男5名,女15名,平均年龄22.90岁,平均BMI为22.72 kg/m2,在以自行选择的速度行走时,髋关节、膝关节和踝关节在三个平面上的角度。采用类内相关系数(ICCs)评价和比较3D-WCRS与标准运动分析系统的重测信度。为了研究的目的,还分析了测量标准误差(SEM)。结果显示,三维wcrs在三个关节和关节面具有良好的重测信度(ICCs范围在0.93 ~ 0.99之间,p = 0.001)。标准运动分析系统对所有关节和关节面表现出良好的可靠性(ICCs范围在0.99至1.00之间,p = 0.001)。在3D-WCRS和标准运动分析系统中观察到最小的SEM值。因此,开发的低成本3D-WCRS具有良好的重测可靠性。3D-WCRS的重测可靠性可能与标准运动分析系统相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis.

Reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis.

Reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis.

Reliability of a low-cost webcam recording system for three-dimensional lower limb gait analysis.

The purposes of this study were to develop and evaluate the test-retest reliability of a specific low-cost three-dimensional webcam recording system (3D-WCRS) and compare its reliability to a standard motion analysis system. Twenty healthy volunteers comprised of 5 males and 15 females with a mean age of 22.90 years and mean BMI of 22.72 kg/m2 were investigated for angles of hip, knee and ankle joints in three planes while walking at a self-selected speed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate as well as compare the test-retest reliability of the 3D-WCRS and standard motion analysis system. Standard error of measurement (SEM) was also analyzed for the purposes of the study. The results exhibited excellent test-retest reliability for the 3D-WCRS (ICCs ranged between 0.93 and 0.99, p = 0.001) in the three joints and planes. The standard motion analysis system demonstrated excellent reliability for all joints and planes (ICCs ranged between 0.99 and 1.00, p = 0.001). Minimal SEM values were observed in both the 3D-WCRS and standard motion analysis systems. Therefore, the developed low-cost 3D-WCRS exhibits good to excellent test-retest reliability. The test-retest reliability of the 3D-WCRS is likely to be comparable to a standard motion analysis system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Biomechanics
International Biomechanics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: International Biomechanics is a fully Open Access biomechanics journal that aims to foster innovation, debate and collaboration across the full spectrum of biomechanics. We publish original articles, reviews, and short communications in all areas of biomechanics and welcome papers that explore: Bio-fluid mechanics, Continuum Biomechanics, Biotribology, Cellular Biomechanics, Mechanobiology, Mechano-transduction, Tissue Mechanics, Comparative Biomechanics and Functional Anatomy, Allometry, Animal locomotion in biomechanics, Gait analysis in biomechanics, Musculoskeletal and Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Cardiovascular Biomechanics, Plant Biomechanics, Injury Biomechanics, Impact Biomechanics, Sport and Exercise Biomechanics, Kinesiology, Rehabilitation in biomechanics, Quantitative Ergonomics, Human Factors engineering, Occupational Biomechanics, Developmental Biomechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信