{"title":"稳定型冠状动脉疾病和糖尿病患者的冠状动脉血运重建。","authors":"Salman Bhat, Yan Yatsynovich, Umesh C Sharma","doi":"10.1177/14791641211002469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of study: </strong>Diabetes mellitus accelerates the development of atherosclerosis. Patients with diabetes mellitus have higher incidence and mortality rates from cardiovascular disease and undergo a disproportionately higher number of coronary interventions compared to the general population. Proper selection of treatment modalities is thus paramount. Treatment strategies include medical management and interventional approaches including coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The purpose of this review is to assimilate emerging evidence comparing CABG to PCI in patients with diabetes and present an outlook on the latest advances in percutaneous interventions, in addition to the optimal medical therapies in patients with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Key methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE was performed to identify prospective, randomized trials comparing outcomes of CABG and PCI, and also PCI with different generations of stents used in patients with diabetes. Additional review of bibliography of selected studies was also performed.</p><p><strong>Main conclusions: </strong>Most of the trials discussed above demonstrate a survival advantage of CABG over PCI in patients with diabetes. However, recent advances in PCI technology are starting to challenge this narrative. Superior stent designs, use of specific drug-eluting stents, image-guided stent deployment, and the use of contemporary antiplatelet and lipid-lowering therapies are continuing to improve the PCI outcomes. Prospective data for such emerging interventional technologies in diabetes is however lacking currently and is the need of the hour.</p>","PeriodicalId":11092,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"14791641211002469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/cc/10.1177_14791641211002469.PMC8482730.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coronary revascularization in patients with stable coronary disease and diabetes mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Salman Bhat, Yan Yatsynovich, Umesh C Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14791641211002469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of study: </strong>Diabetes mellitus accelerates the development of atherosclerosis. Patients with diabetes mellitus have higher incidence and mortality rates from cardiovascular disease and undergo a disproportionately higher number of coronary interventions compared to the general population. Proper selection of treatment modalities is thus paramount. Treatment strategies include medical management and interventional approaches including coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The purpose of this review is to assimilate emerging evidence comparing CABG to PCI in patients with diabetes and present an outlook on the latest advances in percutaneous interventions, in addition to the optimal medical therapies in patients with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Key methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE was performed to identify prospective, randomized trials comparing outcomes of CABG and PCI, and also PCI with different generations of stents used in patients with diabetes. Additional review of bibliography of selected studies was also performed.</p><p><strong>Main conclusions: </strong>Most of the trials discussed above demonstrate a survival advantage of CABG over PCI in patients with diabetes. However, recent advances in PCI technology are starting to challenge this narrative. Superior stent designs, use of specific drug-eluting stents, image-guided stent deployment, and the use of contemporary antiplatelet and lipid-lowering therapies are continuing to improve the PCI outcomes. Prospective data for such emerging interventional technologies in diabetes is however lacking currently and is the need of the hour.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"14791641211002469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/cc/10.1177_14791641211002469.PMC8482730.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14791641211002469\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14791641211002469","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的糖尿病会加速动脉粥样硬化的发展。与普通人群相比,糖尿病患者的心血管疾病发病率和死亡率较高,接受冠状动脉介入治疗的人数也高得不成比例。因此,正确选择治疗方式至关重要。治疗策略包括药物治疗和介入治疗,包括冠状动脉旁路移植手术(CABG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。本综述的目的是吸收新出现的证据,将糖尿病患者的冠状动脉旁路移植手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗进行比较,并展望经皮介入治疗的最新进展,以及糖尿病患者的最佳药物疗法:主要方法:对PubMed、Web of Science和EMBASE进行了系统检索,以确定前瞻性随机试验,比较CABG和PCI的疗效,以及PCI与糖尿病患者使用的不同代支架的疗效。此外,还对部分研究的参考书目进行了补充审查:主要结论:上述讨论的大多数试验表明,在糖尿病患者中,CABG 比 PCI 更能提高患者的生存率。然而,PCI 技术的最新进展开始挑战这一说法。卓越的支架设计、特定药物洗脱支架的使用、图像引导下的支架部署以及当代抗血小板和降脂疗法的使用都在不断改善 PCI 的治疗效果。然而,目前还缺乏此类新兴介入技术在糖尿病患者中应用的前瞻性数据,这是当务之急。
Coronary revascularization in patients with stable coronary disease and diabetes mellitus.
Purpose of study: Diabetes mellitus accelerates the development of atherosclerosis. Patients with diabetes mellitus have higher incidence and mortality rates from cardiovascular disease and undergo a disproportionately higher number of coronary interventions compared to the general population. Proper selection of treatment modalities is thus paramount. Treatment strategies include medical management and interventional approaches including coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The purpose of this review is to assimilate emerging evidence comparing CABG to PCI in patients with diabetes and present an outlook on the latest advances in percutaneous interventions, in addition to the optimal medical therapies in patients with diabetes.
Key methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE was performed to identify prospective, randomized trials comparing outcomes of CABG and PCI, and also PCI with different generations of stents used in patients with diabetes. Additional review of bibliography of selected studies was also performed.
Main conclusions: Most of the trials discussed above demonstrate a survival advantage of CABG over PCI in patients with diabetes. However, recent advances in PCI technology are starting to challenge this narrative. Superior stent designs, use of specific drug-eluting stents, image-guided stent deployment, and the use of contemporary antiplatelet and lipid-lowering therapies are continuing to improve the PCI outcomes. Prospective data for such emerging interventional technologies in diabetes is however lacking currently and is the need of the hour.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research is the first international peer-reviewed journal to unite diabetes and vascular disease in a single title. The journal publishes original papers, research letters and reviews. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)