分娩镇痛对新生儿听力筛查假阳性的影响。

Pinar Kadirogullari, Pinar Yalcin Bahat, Emine Karabuk, Kubra Bagci Cakmak, Kerem Doga Seckin
{"title":"分娩镇痛对新生儿听力筛查假阳性的影响。","authors":"Pinar Kadirogullari,&nbsp;Pinar Yalcin Bahat,&nbsp;Emine Karabuk,&nbsp;Kubra Bagci Cakmak,&nbsp;Kerem Doga Seckin","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2021.1910661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Newborn hearing screening may fail due to some perinatal and neonatal factors. False positivity of newborn hearing screening increases costs, familial concerns and anxiety. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of pethidine administered in the mother for labor analgesia on the false positivity rates of the newborn hearing screening test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was designed as a retrospective and cross-sectional study. A total of 75 pregnant women scheduled for vaginal delivery who received 50 mg intramuscular pethidine at the beginning of the active phase of the labor were included as the patient group and 68 pregnant women who did not receive pethidine as the control group. A total of 143 infants born with vaginal delivery were evaluated with otoacoustic emission (OAE) test before discharge. Perinatal and neonatal variables and test outcomes were recorded, and the correlation between false positivity rate and pethidine usage was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, system records of 148 healthy term newborns were screened. Four patients who failed in both OAE tests and were referred to the Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) test and one patient who failed in all tests (first OAE, control OAE and AABR) and was referred to an upper center for further investigations and treatment were excluded from the study. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of birth features. First stage OAE test was reported as 'passed' in 8 (10.7%) and 58 (85.3%) newborns in the study and control groups, respectively; while OAE was reported as 'referred' and 'passed' in the second test in 67 (89.3%) and 10 (14.7%) newborns in the study and control groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of false positivity ratio (<i>p</i> < 0.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pethidine significantly decreases the duration of the active phase, providing a good analgesic effect for pain management during labor. Therefore, it seems that pethidine can be used as an acceptable agent during labor. However, it may have neonatal effects after the delivery, causing false positivity in newborn hearing screening tests. The results of this study support the opinion that the OAE test should be performed in postpartum later dates in order to increase OAE passing rates and minimize costs and parents' concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":520807,"journal":{"name":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","volume":" ","pages":"6254-6259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1910661","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of analgesia with pethidine during labour on false positivity of newborn hearing screening test.\",\"authors\":\"Pinar Kadirogullari,&nbsp;Pinar Yalcin Bahat,&nbsp;Emine Karabuk,&nbsp;Kubra Bagci Cakmak,&nbsp;Kerem Doga Seckin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2021.1910661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Newborn hearing screening may fail due to some perinatal and neonatal factors. False positivity of newborn hearing screening increases costs, familial concerns and anxiety. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of pethidine administered in the mother for labor analgesia on the false positivity rates of the newborn hearing screening test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was designed as a retrospective and cross-sectional study. A total of 75 pregnant women scheduled for vaginal delivery who received 50 mg intramuscular pethidine at the beginning of the active phase of the labor were included as the patient group and 68 pregnant women who did not receive pethidine as the control group. A total of 143 infants born with vaginal delivery were evaluated with otoacoustic emission (OAE) test before discharge. Perinatal and neonatal variables and test outcomes were recorded, and the correlation between false positivity rate and pethidine usage was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, system records of 148 healthy term newborns were screened. Four patients who failed in both OAE tests and were referred to the Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) test and one patient who failed in all tests (first OAE, control OAE and AABR) and was referred to an upper center for further investigations and treatment were excluded from the study. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of birth features. First stage OAE test was reported as 'passed' in 8 (10.7%) and 58 (85.3%) newborns in the study and control groups, respectively; while OAE was reported as 'referred' and 'passed' in the second test in 67 (89.3%) and 10 (14.7%) newborns in the study and control groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of false positivity ratio (<i>p</i> < 0.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pethidine significantly decreases the duration of the active phase, providing a good analgesic effect for pain management during labor. Therefore, it seems that pethidine can be used as an acceptable agent during labor. However, it may have neonatal effects after the delivery, causing false positivity in newborn hearing screening tests. The results of this study support the opinion that the OAE test should be performed in postpartum later dates in order to increase OAE passing rates and minimize costs and parents' concerns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6254-6259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1910661\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1910661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1910661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:新生儿听力筛查可能由于一些围产期和新生儿因素而失败。新生儿听力筛查假阳性增加了费用、家庭担忧和焦虑。本研究的目的是确定哌替啶对产妇分娩镇痛对新生儿听力筛查试验假阳性率的影响。方法:本研究采用回顾性和横断面研究。共有75名计划阴道分娩的孕妇在分娩活跃期开始时接受50mg肌肉注射哌替啶作为患者组,68名未接受哌替啶的孕妇作为对照组。对143例阴道分娩新生儿进行出院前耳声发射(OAE)测试。记录围产期和新生儿变量及检测结果,并评估假阳性率与哌替啶使用的相关性。结果:初步筛选了148例健康足月新生儿的系统记录。四名在两项OAE测试中均失败并被转至自动听觉脑干反应(AABR)测试的患者和一名在所有测试(首次OAE,对照OAE和AABR)中均失败并被转至上层中心进行进一步调查和治疗的患者被排除在研究之外。在出生特征方面,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。第一阶段OAE测试在研究组和对照组中分别有8例(10.7%)和58例(85.3%)新生儿“通过”;而在研究组和对照组中,分别有67名(89.3%)和10名(14.7%)新生儿的OAE在第二次测试中被“提及”和“通过”。两组假阳性率比较,差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:哌替啶可显著缩短产妇活动性持续时间,对分娩疼痛管理有良好的镇痛效果。因此,哌替啶似乎可以作为一种可接受的药物在分娩期间使用。然而,它可能在分娩后对新生儿产生影响,导致新生儿听力筛查测试的假阳性。本研究结果支持在产后后期进行OAE检测,以提高OAE合格率,减少成本和家长的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of analgesia with pethidine during labour on false positivity of newborn hearing screening test.

Objectives: Newborn hearing screening may fail due to some perinatal and neonatal factors. False positivity of newborn hearing screening increases costs, familial concerns and anxiety. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of pethidine administered in the mother for labor analgesia on the false positivity rates of the newborn hearing screening test.

Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective and cross-sectional study. A total of 75 pregnant women scheduled for vaginal delivery who received 50 mg intramuscular pethidine at the beginning of the active phase of the labor were included as the patient group and 68 pregnant women who did not receive pethidine as the control group. A total of 143 infants born with vaginal delivery were evaluated with otoacoustic emission (OAE) test before discharge. Perinatal and neonatal variables and test outcomes were recorded, and the correlation between false positivity rate and pethidine usage was evaluated.

Results: Initially, system records of 148 healthy term newborns were screened. Four patients who failed in both OAE tests and were referred to the Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) test and one patient who failed in all tests (first OAE, control OAE and AABR) and was referred to an upper center for further investigations and treatment were excluded from the study. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of birth features. First stage OAE test was reported as 'passed' in 8 (10.7%) and 58 (85.3%) newborns in the study and control groups, respectively; while OAE was reported as 'referred' and 'passed' in the second test in 67 (89.3%) and 10 (14.7%) newborns in the study and control groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of false positivity ratio (p < 0.5).

Conclusion: Pethidine significantly decreases the duration of the active phase, providing a good analgesic effect for pain management during labor. Therefore, it seems that pethidine can be used as an acceptable agent during labor. However, it may have neonatal effects after the delivery, causing false positivity in newborn hearing screening tests. The results of this study support the opinion that the OAE test should be performed in postpartum later dates in order to increase OAE passing rates and minimize costs and parents' concerns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信