慢性神经肌肉疾病患者的咳嗽增强技术。

Brenda Morrow, Andrew Argent, Marco Zampoli, Anri Human, Lieselotte Corten, Michel Toussaint
{"title":"慢性神经肌肉疾病患者的咳嗽增强技术。","authors":"Brenda Morrow,&nbsp;Andrew Argent,&nbsp;Marco Zampoli,&nbsp;Anri Human,&nbsp;Lieselotte Corten,&nbsp;Michel Toussaint","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD013170.pub2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with neuromuscular disorders may have a weak, ineffective cough predisposing them to respiratory complications. Cough augmentation techniques aim to improve cough effectiveness and mucous clearance, reduce the frequency and duration of respiratory infections requiring hospital admission, and improve quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the efficacy and safety of cough augmentation techniques in adults and children with chronic neuromuscular disorders.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>On 13 April 2020, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and randomised cross-over trials.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included trials of cough augmentation techniques compared to no treatment, alternative techniques, or combinations thereof, in adults and children with chronic neuromuscular disorders.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcomes were the number and duration of unscheduled hospitalisations for acute respiratory exacerbations. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The review included 11 studies involving 287 adults and children, aged three to 73 years. Inadequately reported cross-over studies and the limited additional information provided by authors severely restricted the number of analyses that could be performed. Studies compared manually assisted cough, mechanical insufflation, manual and mechanical breathstacking, mechanical insufflation-exsufflation, glossopharyngeal breathing, and combination techniques to unassisted cough and alternative or sham interventions. None of the included studies reported on the primary outcomes of this review (number and duration of unscheduled hospital admissions) or listed 'adverse events' as primary or secondary outcome measures. The evidence suggests that a range of cough augmentation techniques may increase peak cough flow compared to unassisted cough (199 participants, 8 RCTs), but the evidence is very uncertain. There may be little to no difference in peak cough flow outcomes between alternative cough augmentation techniques (216 participants, 9 RCTs). There was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of interventions on measures of gaseous exchange, pulmonary function, quality of life, general function, or participant preference and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>We are very uncertain about the safety and efficacy of cough augmentation techniques in adults and children with chronic neuromuscular disorders and further studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":515753,"journal":{"name":"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews","volume":" ","pages":"CD013170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/14651858.CD013170.pub2","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cough augmentation techniques for people with chronic neuromuscular disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Brenda Morrow,&nbsp;Andrew Argent,&nbsp;Marco Zampoli,&nbsp;Anri Human,&nbsp;Lieselotte Corten,&nbsp;Michel Toussaint\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/14651858.CD013170.pub2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with neuromuscular disorders may have a weak, ineffective cough predisposing them to respiratory complications. Cough augmentation techniques aim to improve cough effectiveness and mucous clearance, reduce the frequency and duration of respiratory infections requiring hospital admission, and improve quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the efficacy and safety of cough augmentation techniques in adults and children with chronic neuromuscular disorders.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>On 13 April 2020, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and randomised cross-over trials.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We included trials of cough augmentation techniques compared to no treatment, alternative techniques, or combinations thereof, in adults and children with chronic neuromuscular disorders.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcomes were the number and duration of unscheduled hospitalisations for acute respiratory exacerbations. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The review included 11 studies involving 287 adults and children, aged three to 73 years. Inadequately reported cross-over studies and the limited additional information provided by authors severely restricted the number of analyses that could be performed. Studies compared manually assisted cough, mechanical insufflation, manual and mechanical breathstacking, mechanical insufflation-exsufflation, glossopharyngeal breathing, and combination techniques to unassisted cough and alternative or sham interventions. None of the included studies reported on the primary outcomes of this review (number and duration of unscheduled hospital admissions) or listed 'adverse events' as primary or secondary outcome measures. The evidence suggests that a range of cough augmentation techniques may increase peak cough flow compared to unassisted cough (199 participants, 8 RCTs), but the evidence is very uncertain. There may be little to no difference in peak cough flow outcomes between alternative cough augmentation techniques (216 participants, 9 RCTs). There was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of interventions on measures of gaseous exchange, pulmonary function, quality of life, general function, or participant preference and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>We are very uncertain about the safety and efficacy of cough augmentation techniques in adults and children with chronic neuromuscular disorders and further studies are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":515753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"CD013170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/14651858.CD013170.pub2\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013170.pub2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cochrane database of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013170.pub2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:患有神经肌肉疾病的人可能有微弱、无效的咳嗽,使他们容易出现呼吸系统并发症。咳嗽增强技术旨在提高咳嗽效果和粘液清除,减少需要住院的呼吸道感染的频率和持续时间,提高生活质量。目的:探讨成人和儿童慢性神经肌肉疾病的咳嗽增强技术的有效性和安全性。检索方法:2020年4月13日,我们检索了Cochrane神经肌肉专业注册、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和ClinicalTrials.gov,检索了随机对照试验(rct)、准rct和随机交叉试验。选择标准:在慢性神经肌肉疾病的成人和儿童中,我们纳入了咳嗽增强技术与无治疗、替代技术或其组合的比较试验。数据收集和分析:两位综述作者独立评估试验资格、提取数据和评估偏倚风险。主要结局是急性呼吸恶化非计划住院的次数和持续时间。我们使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。主要结果:本综述纳入了11项研究,涉及287名成人和儿童,年龄在3至73岁之间。交叉研究报告不充分,作者提供的额外信息有限,严重限制了可以进行的分析的数量。研究比较了手动辅助咳嗽、机械吸气、手动和机械呼吸叠加、机械吸气-呼气、舌咽部呼吸和联合技术与无辅助咳嗽和替代或假干预的效果。纳入的研究均未报告本综述的主要结局(计划外住院次数和持续时间),也未将“不良事件”列为主要或次要结局指标。有证据表明,与无辅助咳嗽相比,一系列咳嗽增强技术可能会增加峰值咳嗽流量(199名参与者,8项随机对照试验),但证据非常不确定。在不同的咳嗽增强技术之间,峰值咳嗽流结果可能几乎没有差异(216名参与者,9项随机对照试验)。没有足够的证据来确定干预措施对气体交换、肺功能、生活质量、一般功能或参与者偏好和满意度的影响。作者的结论:我们非常不确定咳嗽增强技术对慢性神经肌肉疾病的成人和儿童的安全性和有效性,需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cough augmentation techniques for people with chronic neuromuscular disorders.

Background: People with neuromuscular disorders may have a weak, ineffective cough predisposing them to respiratory complications. Cough augmentation techniques aim to improve cough effectiveness and mucous clearance, reduce the frequency and duration of respiratory infections requiring hospital admission, and improve quality of life.

Objectives: To determine the efficacy and safety of cough augmentation techniques in adults and children with chronic neuromuscular disorders.

Search methods: On 13 April 2020, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and randomised cross-over trials.

Selection criteria: We included trials of cough augmentation techniques compared to no treatment, alternative techniques, or combinations thereof, in adults and children with chronic neuromuscular disorders.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcomes were the number and duration of unscheduled hospitalisations for acute respiratory exacerbations. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

Main results: The review included 11 studies involving 287 adults and children, aged three to 73 years. Inadequately reported cross-over studies and the limited additional information provided by authors severely restricted the number of analyses that could be performed. Studies compared manually assisted cough, mechanical insufflation, manual and mechanical breathstacking, mechanical insufflation-exsufflation, glossopharyngeal breathing, and combination techniques to unassisted cough and alternative or sham interventions. None of the included studies reported on the primary outcomes of this review (number and duration of unscheduled hospital admissions) or listed 'adverse events' as primary or secondary outcome measures. The evidence suggests that a range of cough augmentation techniques may increase peak cough flow compared to unassisted cough (199 participants, 8 RCTs), but the evidence is very uncertain. There may be little to no difference in peak cough flow outcomes between alternative cough augmentation techniques (216 participants, 9 RCTs). There was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of interventions on measures of gaseous exchange, pulmonary function, quality of life, general function, or participant preference and satisfaction.

Authors' conclusions: We are very uncertain about the safety and efficacy of cough augmentation techniques in adults and children with chronic neuromuscular disorders and further studies are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信