比较等渗与低渗静脉液体维持液体治疗大于或等于34孕周的新生儿-一项随机临床试验。

Krishna Dathan, Mangalabharathi Sundaram
{"title":"比较等渗与低渗静脉液体维持液体治疗大于或等于34孕周的新生儿-一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Krishna Dathan,&nbsp;Mangalabharathi Sundaram","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2021.1911998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The use of hypotonic fluids as maintenance therapy in the neonatal population has been in practice for a long time, but there is a lack of evidence for the choice of this fluid in neonates. This study compared isotonic (sodium chloride, 0.9%, and dextrose, 5%) versus hypotonic (sodium chloride, 0.15%, and dextrose, 5%) intravenous fluid for maintenance fluid therapy in neonates more than or equal to 34 weeks of gestational age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this triple-blind randomized clinical trial, we recruited 60 neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care children's hospital from June 2017 through May 2018 with normal baseline serum sodium levels, anticipated to require intravenous maintenance fluids for 24 hours or longer (intention-to-treat analyses). Patients were randomized to receive isotonic or hypotonic intravenous fluid at maintenance rates for 72 hours. The primary outcome was the incidence of hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium <135mEq/L) at 24 hours in both groups. The secondary outcomes were incidence of hypernatremia at 24 hours (defined as serum sodium >145 mEq/L), the incidence of hypo and hypernatremia at 48 and 72 hours, mean serum sodium at 24, 48, and 72 hours, rate of change of serum sodium during the study period, mean serum osmolality at the end of the study period, the absolute difference in osmolality during the study period, the absolute difference in weight during the study period and edema during the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 60 enrolled neonates, 31 received isotonic fluids and 29 received hypotonic fluids. Three patients in the hypotonic group developed hyponatremia and none in isotonic group at 24 h (RR = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.007 - 2.485; <i>p</i> = .106). Fourteen neonates developed hypernatremia in the isotonic group and one in hypotonic group at 24 h (RR = 13.09; 95% CI = 1.83 - 93.4; <i>p</i> = .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study results do not support the hypothesis that isotonic fluid is superior to hypotonic fluid in reducing the proportion of neonates developing hyponatremia after 24 hours of intravenous fluid therapy. The proportion of neonates developing hypernatremia is significantly higher after using isotonic fluid for maintenance therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION CTRI/2017/05/008585.</p>","PeriodicalId":520807,"journal":{"name":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","volume":" ","pages":"6338-6345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1911998","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of isotonic versus hypotonic intravenous fluid for maintenance fluid therapy in neonates more than or equal to 34 weeks of gestational age - a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Krishna Dathan,&nbsp;Mangalabharathi Sundaram\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2021.1911998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The use of hypotonic fluids as maintenance therapy in the neonatal population has been in practice for a long time, but there is a lack of evidence for the choice of this fluid in neonates. This study compared isotonic (sodium chloride, 0.9%, and dextrose, 5%) versus hypotonic (sodium chloride, 0.15%, and dextrose, 5%) intravenous fluid for maintenance fluid therapy in neonates more than or equal to 34 weeks of gestational age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this triple-blind randomized clinical trial, we recruited 60 neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care children's hospital from June 2017 through May 2018 with normal baseline serum sodium levels, anticipated to require intravenous maintenance fluids for 24 hours or longer (intention-to-treat analyses). Patients were randomized to receive isotonic or hypotonic intravenous fluid at maintenance rates for 72 hours. The primary outcome was the incidence of hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium <135mEq/L) at 24 hours in both groups. The secondary outcomes were incidence of hypernatremia at 24 hours (defined as serum sodium >145 mEq/L), the incidence of hypo and hypernatremia at 48 and 72 hours, mean serum sodium at 24, 48, and 72 hours, rate of change of serum sodium during the study period, mean serum osmolality at the end of the study period, the absolute difference in osmolality during the study period, the absolute difference in weight during the study period and edema during the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 60 enrolled neonates, 31 received isotonic fluids and 29 received hypotonic fluids. Three patients in the hypotonic group developed hyponatremia and none in isotonic group at 24 h (RR = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.007 - 2.485; <i>p</i> = .106). Fourteen neonates developed hypernatremia in the isotonic group and one in hypotonic group at 24 h (RR = 13.09; 95% CI = 1.83 - 93.4; <i>p</i> = .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study results do not support the hypothesis that isotonic fluid is superior to hypotonic fluid in reducing the proportion of neonates developing hyponatremia after 24 hours of intravenous fluid therapy. The proportion of neonates developing hypernatremia is significantly higher after using isotonic fluid for maintenance therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION CTRI/2017/05/008585.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6338-6345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1911998\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1911998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1911998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景和目的:在新生儿人群中使用低渗液体作为维持治疗已经实践了很长时间,但缺乏证据表明新生儿选择这种液体。本研究比较了等渗(氯化钠,0.9%,葡萄糖,5%)和低渗(氯化钠,0.15%,葡萄糖,5%)静脉输液对大于或等于34孕周的新生儿的维持液治疗。方法:在这项三盲随机临床试验中,我们招募了60名从2017年6月至2018年5月在一家三级儿童医院新生儿重症监护病房住院的新生儿,这些新生儿的基线血清钠水平正常,预计需要静脉维持液24小时或更长时间(意向治疗分析)。患者随机接受等渗或低渗静脉输液维持72小时。主要结局是低钠血症的发生率(定义为血清钠145 mEq/L)、48和72小时低钠血症和高钠血症的发生率、24、48和72小时的平均血清钠、研究期间血清钠的变化率、研究结束时的平均血清渗透压、研究期间渗透压的绝对差值、研究期间体重和研究期间水肿的绝对差值。结果:60例新生儿中,31例接受等渗补液,29例接受低渗补液。低渗组24 h出现低钠血症3例,等渗组无一例(RR = 0.13;95% ci = 0.007 - 2.485;p = .106)。等渗组24 h出现高钠血症14例,低渗组1例(RR = 13.09;95% ci = 1.83 - 93.4;p = 0.0001)。结论:我们的研究结果不支持等渗液优于低渗液在降低新生儿在24小时静脉输液后发生低钠血症的比例方面的假设。使用等渗液维持治疗后,新生儿发生高钠血症的比例明显较高。试验注册ctri /2017/05/008585。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of isotonic versus hypotonic intravenous fluid for maintenance fluid therapy in neonates more than or equal to 34 weeks of gestational age - a randomized clinical trial.

Background and objectives: The use of hypotonic fluids as maintenance therapy in the neonatal population has been in practice for a long time, but there is a lack of evidence for the choice of this fluid in neonates. This study compared isotonic (sodium chloride, 0.9%, and dextrose, 5%) versus hypotonic (sodium chloride, 0.15%, and dextrose, 5%) intravenous fluid for maintenance fluid therapy in neonates more than or equal to 34 weeks of gestational age.

Methods: In this triple-blind randomized clinical trial, we recruited 60 neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care children's hospital from June 2017 through May 2018 with normal baseline serum sodium levels, anticipated to require intravenous maintenance fluids for 24 hours or longer (intention-to-treat analyses). Patients were randomized to receive isotonic or hypotonic intravenous fluid at maintenance rates for 72 hours. The primary outcome was the incidence of hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium <135mEq/L) at 24 hours in both groups. The secondary outcomes were incidence of hypernatremia at 24 hours (defined as serum sodium >145 mEq/L), the incidence of hypo and hypernatremia at 48 and 72 hours, mean serum sodium at 24, 48, and 72 hours, rate of change of serum sodium during the study period, mean serum osmolality at the end of the study period, the absolute difference in osmolality during the study period, the absolute difference in weight during the study period and edema during the study period.

Results: Of 60 enrolled neonates, 31 received isotonic fluids and 29 received hypotonic fluids. Three patients in the hypotonic group developed hyponatremia and none in isotonic group at 24 h (RR = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.007 - 2.485; p = .106). Fourteen neonates developed hypernatremia in the isotonic group and one in hypotonic group at 24 h (RR = 13.09; 95% CI = 1.83 - 93.4; p = .0001).

Conclusions: Our study results do not support the hypothesis that isotonic fluid is superior to hypotonic fluid in reducing the proportion of neonates developing hyponatremia after 24 hours of intravenous fluid therapy. The proportion of neonates developing hypernatremia is significantly higher after using isotonic fluid for maintenance therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION CTRI/2017/05/008585.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信