Mana Modares, Kate Hanneman, Maral Ouzounian, Jennifer Chung, Elsie T Nguyen
{"title":"急性主动脉综合征的计算机断层血管造影评估:分类、鉴别成像特征和成像解释缺陷。","authors":"Mana Modares, Kate Hanneman, Maral Ouzounian, Jennifer Chung, Elsie T Nguyen","doi":"10.1177/08465371211001525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is an important life-threatening condition that requires early detection and management. Acute intramural hematoma (IMH), aortic dissection (AD) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) are included in AAS. ADs can be classified using the well-known Stanford or DeBakey classification systems. However, these classification systems omit description of arch dissections, anatomic variants, and morphologic features that impact outcome. The Society for Vascular Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (SVS-STS) have recently introduced a classification system that classifies ADs according to the location of the entry tear (primary intimomedial tear, PIT) and the proximal and distal extent of involvement, but does not include description of all morphologic features that may have diagnostic and prognostic significance. This review describes these classification systems for ADs and other AAS entities as well as their limitations. Typical computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging appearance and differentiating features of ADs, limited intimal tears (LITs), IMHs, intramural blood pools (IBPs), ulcer-like projections (ULPs), and PAUs will be discussed. Furthermore, this review highlights common imaging interpretation pitfalls, what should be included in a comprehensive CTA report, and provides a brief overview of current management options.</p>","PeriodicalId":444006,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes","volume":" ","pages":"228-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/08465371211001525","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computed Tomography Angiography Assessment of Acute Aortic Syndromes: Classification, Differentiating Imaging Features, and Imaging Interpretation Pitfalls.\",\"authors\":\"Mana Modares, Kate Hanneman, Maral Ouzounian, Jennifer Chung, Elsie T Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08465371211001525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is an important life-threatening condition that requires early detection and management. Acute intramural hematoma (IMH), aortic dissection (AD) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) are included in AAS. ADs can be classified using the well-known Stanford or DeBakey classification systems. However, these classification systems omit description of arch dissections, anatomic variants, and morphologic features that impact outcome. The Society for Vascular Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (SVS-STS) have recently introduced a classification system that classifies ADs according to the location of the entry tear (primary intimomedial tear, PIT) and the proximal and distal extent of involvement, but does not include description of all morphologic features that may have diagnostic and prognostic significance. This review describes these classification systems for ADs and other AAS entities as well as their limitations. Typical computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging appearance and differentiating features of ADs, limited intimal tears (LITs), IMHs, intramural blood pools (IBPs), ulcer-like projections (ULPs), and PAUs will be discussed. Furthermore, this review highlights common imaging interpretation pitfalls, what should be included in a comprehensive CTA report, and provides a brief overview of current management options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":444006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"228-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/08465371211001525\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371211001525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371211001525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
急性主动脉综合征(AAS)是一种重要的危及生命的疾病,需要早期发现和治疗。急性壁内血肿(IMH)、主动脉夹层(AD)和穿透性动脉粥样硬化性溃疡(PAU)包括在AAS中。ADs可以使用著名的Stanford或DeBakey分类系统进行分类。然而,这些分类系统忽略了对足弓解剖、解剖变异和影响结果的形态学特征的描述。血管外科学会(Society for Vascular Surgery)和胸外科学会(Society of Thoracic Surgeons, SVS-STS)最近推出了一种分类系统,根据进入性撕裂的位置(原发性内膜撕裂,PIT)和近端和远端受损伤程度对ad进行分类,但不包括可能具有诊断和预后意义的所有形态学特征的描述。本文综述了这些分类系统对ad和其他AAS实体及其局限性。本文将讨论典型的计算机断层血管造影(CTA)图像表现和ad、有限内膜撕裂(LITs)、IMHs、内部血池(IBPs)、溃疡样突出(ULPs)和PAUs的鉴别特征。此外,本综述强调了常见的成像解释缺陷,这些缺陷应包括在全面的CTA报告中,并提供了当前管理选择的简要概述。
Computed Tomography Angiography Assessment of Acute Aortic Syndromes: Classification, Differentiating Imaging Features, and Imaging Interpretation Pitfalls.
An acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is an important life-threatening condition that requires early detection and management. Acute intramural hematoma (IMH), aortic dissection (AD) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) are included in AAS. ADs can be classified using the well-known Stanford or DeBakey classification systems. However, these classification systems omit description of arch dissections, anatomic variants, and morphologic features that impact outcome. The Society for Vascular Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (SVS-STS) have recently introduced a classification system that classifies ADs according to the location of the entry tear (primary intimomedial tear, PIT) and the proximal and distal extent of involvement, but does not include description of all morphologic features that may have diagnostic and prognostic significance. This review describes these classification systems for ADs and other AAS entities as well as their limitations. Typical computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging appearance and differentiating features of ADs, limited intimal tears (LITs), IMHs, intramural blood pools (IBPs), ulcer-like projections (ULPs), and PAUs will be discussed. Furthermore, this review highlights common imaging interpretation pitfalls, what should be included in a comprehensive CTA report, and provides a brief overview of current management options.