产前磁共振成像和产后Gesell发育时间表评分对轻中度单纯性双侧胎儿脑室肿大的价值。

Zhi Li, Liming Pan, Yaning Chen, Diyun Meng, Yuqin Liu, Lan Li, Mingsong Liu, Zhiqin Luo
{"title":"产前磁共振成像和产后Gesell发育时间表评分对轻中度单纯性双侧胎儿脑室肿大的价值。","authors":"Zhi Li,&nbsp;Liming Pan,&nbsp;Yaning Chen,&nbsp;Diyun Meng,&nbsp;Yuqin Liu,&nbsp;Lan Li,&nbsp;Mingsong Liu,&nbsp;Zhiqin Luo","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2021.1910657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the relationship of mild-to-moderate simple bilateral fetal ventriculomegaly with postnatal neurological development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cases of simple lateral ventricular dilatation (273) were divided into bilateral mild dilatation (10.0-12.0 mm, 62), bilateral moderate dilatation (12.1-15.0 mm, 29), unilateral mild dilatation (133), and unilateral moderate dilatation (49) groups. The control group comprised 50 normal fetuses. Neurological development was assessed using Gesell Developmental Schedules (GDS) at postnatal 3, 6, 12, and 18 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At postnatal 6, 12, and 18 months, the GDS score was higher for bilateral than for unilateral dilatation (<i>p</i> < .05). At postnatal 3 and 6 months, the GDS score was higher for the bilateral dilatation groups than for the control group (<i>p</i> < .05). At postnatal 6, 12, and 18 months, the GDS score was higher for the bilateral moderate dilatation group than for the unilateral moderate dilatation group (<i>p</i> < .05). Further, at postnatal 3, 6, 12, and 18 months, the GDS score was higher for the bilateral moderate dilatation group than for the control group (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At postnatal month 6, the GDS evaluation results of the bilateral dilatation groups were significantly inferior compared to those of the unilateral dilatation group.</p>","PeriodicalId":520807,"journal":{"name":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","volume":" ","pages":"6229-6235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1910657","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging and postnatal follow-up using Gesell Developmental Schedules score for mild-to-moderate simple bilateral fetal ventriculomegaly.\",\"authors\":\"Zhi Li,&nbsp;Liming Pan,&nbsp;Yaning Chen,&nbsp;Diyun Meng,&nbsp;Yuqin Liu,&nbsp;Lan Li,&nbsp;Mingsong Liu,&nbsp;Zhiqin Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2021.1910657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the relationship of mild-to-moderate simple bilateral fetal ventriculomegaly with postnatal neurological development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cases of simple lateral ventricular dilatation (273) were divided into bilateral mild dilatation (10.0-12.0 mm, 62), bilateral moderate dilatation (12.1-15.0 mm, 29), unilateral mild dilatation (133), and unilateral moderate dilatation (49) groups. The control group comprised 50 normal fetuses. Neurological development was assessed using Gesell Developmental Schedules (GDS) at postnatal 3, 6, 12, and 18 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At postnatal 6, 12, and 18 months, the GDS score was higher for bilateral than for unilateral dilatation (<i>p</i> < .05). At postnatal 3 and 6 months, the GDS score was higher for the bilateral dilatation groups than for the control group (<i>p</i> < .05). At postnatal 6, 12, and 18 months, the GDS score was higher for the bilateral moderate dilatation group than for the unilateral moderate dilatation group (<i>p</i> < .05). Further, at postnatal 3, 6, 12, and 18 months, the GDS score was higher for the bilateral moderate dilatation group than for the control group (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At postnatal month 6, the GDS evaluation results of the bilateral dilatation groups were significantly inferior compared to those of the unilateral dilatation group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6229-6235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1910657\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1910657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1910657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:探讨轻中度单纯性双侧胎儿脑室肿大与产后神经发育的关系。方法:单纯侧脑室扩张273例,分为双侧轻度扩张组(10.0 ~ 12.0 mm, 62例)、双侧中度扩张组(12.1 ~ 15.0 mm, 29例)、单侧轻度扩张组(133例)、单侧中度扩张组(49例)。对照组为50例正常胎儿。在出生后3、6、12和18个月使用Gesell发育时间表(GDS)评估神经发育。结果:产后6、12、18个月时,双侧扩张组GDS评分高于单侧扩张组(p p p p)。结论:产后6个月时,双侧扩张组GDS评分明显低于单侧扩张组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The value of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging and postnatal follow-up using Gesell Developmental Schedules score for mild-to-moderate simple bilateral fetal ventriculomegaly.

Objective: To investigate the relationship of mild-to-moderate simple bilateral fetal ventriculomegaly with postnatal neurological development.

Methods: Cases of simple lateral ventricular dilatation (273) were divided into bilateral mild dilatation (10.0-12.0 mm, 62), bilateral moderate dilatation (12.1-15.0 mm, 29), unilateral mild dilatation (133), and unilateral moderate dilatation (49) groups. The control group comprised 50 normal fetuses. Neurological development was assessed using Gesell Developmental Schedules (GDS) at postnatal 3, 6, 12, and 18 months.

Results: At postnatal 6, 12, and 18 months, the GDS score was higher for bilateral than for unilateral dilatation (p < .05). At postnatal 3 and 6 months, the GDS score was higher for the bilateral dilatation groups than for the control group (p < .05). At postnatal 6, 12, and 18 months, the GDS score was higher for the bilateral moderate dilatation group than for the unilateral moderate dilatation group (p < .05). Further, at postnatal 3, 6, 12, and 18 months, the GDS score was higher for the bilateral moderate dilatation group than for the control group (p < .05).

Conclusion: At postnatal month 6, the GDS evaluation results of the bilateral dilatation groups were significantly inferior compared to those of the unilateral dilatation group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信