临床决策支持在减少心力衰竭患者再入院中的应用:一项准实验研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Contemporary Nurse Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-05 DOI:10.1080/10376178.2021.1919161
Susan R Giscombe, Diana-Lyn Baptiste, Binu Koirala, Reiko Asano, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah
{"title":"临床决策支持在减少心力衰竭患者再入院中的应用:一项准实验研究。","authors":"Susan R Giscombe,&nbsp;Diana-Lyn Baptiste,&nbsp;Binu Koirala,&nbsp;Reiko Asano,&nbsp;Yvonne Commodore-Mensah","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2021.1919161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure is a chronic, progressive condition which affects over six million Americans and 26 million people worldwide. Evidence-based guidelines, protocols, and decision-support tools are available to enhance the quality of care delivery but are not implemented consistently.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the effect of clinical decision-making support during patient discharge on 30-day hospital readmission among patients admitted with heart failure and evaluate provider utilization and satisfaction of clinical decision support tool.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A quasi-experimental study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An intervention group of hospitalized patients (<i>N</i> = 55) with heart failure were provided the intervention over a 3-month period and compared to the pre-intervention comparison group (<i>N</i> = 109) of patients who did not receive the intervention. An evidence-based discharge checklist and a pocket guide was implemented by an advanced practice nurse to assist health providers with clinical decision making. Descriptive statistics among samples, 30-day readmission rates, and provider utilization and satisfaction were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Readmission rates slightly decreased (<i>N</i> = 109, 9.2% vs. <i>N</i> = 55, 9.1%) in the post-intervention period, but no significant difference. Heterogeneity between the two groups were minimal related to use of specific medications, age, length-of-stay and comorbidities. Descriptively, there was a significant difference the use of diuretics among each group (<i>p</i> = .002).The discharge checklist was used regularly by 67% of (<i>N</i> = 15) providers, and 93% expressed satisfaction with use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant reduction in 30-day readmission rates between both groups. However, a slight reduction was noted which indicates the need for further examination into how the use of checklists for clinical decision support can reduce readmissions. A well-designed evidence-based discharge plan remains a critical component of the patient discharge process. Advance practice nurses are uniquely qualified to implement evidence-based interventions that promote practice change among health care providers and improve health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55633,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Nurse","volume":"57 1-2","pages":"39-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10376178.2021.1919161","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of clinical decision support in reducing readmissions for patients with heart failure: a quasi-experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"Susan R Giscombe,&nbsp;Diana-Lyn Baptiste,&nbsp;Binu Koirala,&nbsp;Reiko Asano,&nbsp;Yvonne Commodore-Mensah\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10376178.2021.1919161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure is a chronic, progressive condition which affects over six million Americans and 26 million people worldwide. Evidence-based guidelines, protocols, and decision-support tools are available to enhance the quality of care delivery but are not implemented consistently.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the effect of clinical decision-making support during patient discharge on 30-day hospital readmission among patients admitted with heart failure and evaluate provider utilization and satisfaction of clinical decision support tool.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A quasi-experimental study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An intervention group of hospitalized patients (<i>N</i> = 55) with heart failure were provided the intervention over a 3-month period and compared to the pre-intervention comparison group (<i>N</i> = 109) of patients who did not receive the intervention. An evidence-based discharge checklist and a pocket guide was implemented by an advanced practice nurse to assist health providers with clinical decision making. Descriptive statistics among samples, 30-day readmission rates, and provider utilization and satisfaction were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Readmission rates slightly decreased (<i>N</i> = 109, 9.2% vs. <i>N</i> = 55, 9.1%) in the post-intervention period, but no significant difference. Heterogeneity between the two groups were minimal related to use of specific medications, age, length-of-stay and comorbidities. Descriptively, there was a significant difference the use of diuretics among each group (<i>p</i> = .002).The discharge checklist was used regularly by 67% of (<i>N</i> = 15) providers, and 93% expressed satisfaction with use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant reduction in 30-day readmission rates between both groups. However, a slight reduction was noted which indicates the need for further examination into how the use of checklists for clinical decision support can reduce readmissions. A well-designed evidence-based discharge plan remains a critical component of the patient discharge process. Advance practice nurses are uniquely qualified to implement evidence-based interventions that promote practice change among health care providers and improve health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Nurse\",\"volume\":\"57 1-2\",\"pages\":\"39-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10376178.2021.1919161\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Nurse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.1919161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.1919161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心力衰竭是一种慢性进行性疾病,影响着600多万美国人和全世界2600万人。基于证据的指南、方案和决策支持工具可用于提高医疗服务质量,但没有得到一致的实施。目的:探讨出院时临床决策支持对心力衰竭患者30天再入院的影响,评价临床决策支持工具的使用率和满意度。设计:准实验研究。方法:对住院心力衰竭患者(55例)进行为期3个月的干预,并与未进行干预的干预前对照组(109例)进行比较。一名高级执业护士实施了循证出院清单和袖珍指南,以协助医疗服务提供者进行临床决策。对样本间的描述性统计、30天再入院率、提供者利用率和满意度进行了检查。结果:干预后患者再入院率略有下降(N = 109, 9.2% vs. N = 55, 9.1%),但差异无统计学意义。两组之间的异质性与使用特定药物、年龄、住院时间和合并症的关系最小。描述性地,两组间利尿剂的使用有显著差异(p = 0.002)。67% (N = 15)的医生定期使用出院检查表,93%的医生对出院检查表的使用表示满意。结论:两组患者30天再入院率无显著降低。然而,注意到略有减少,这表明需要进一步研究如何使用核对表进行临床决策支持以减少再入院。一个精心设计的循证出院计划仍然是病人出院过程的关键组成部分。高级执业护士是唯一有资格实施以证据为基础的干预措施,促进卫生保健提供者的实践改变和改善健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of clinical decision support in reducing readmissions for patients with heart failure: a quasi-experimental study.

Background: Heart failure is a chronic, progressive condition which affects over six million Americans and 26 million people worldwide. Evidence-based guidelines, protocols, and decision-support tools are available to enhance the quality of care delivery but are not implemented consistently.

Aims: To examine the effect of clinical decision-making support during patient discharge on 30-day hospital readmission among patients admitted with heart failure and evaluate provider utilization and satisfaction of clinical decision support tool.

Design: A quasi-experimental study.

Methods: An intervention group of hospitalized patients (N = 55) with heart failure were provided the intervention over a 3-month period and compared to the pre-intervention comparison group (N = 109) of patients who did not receive the intervention. An evidence-based discharge checklist and a pocket guide was implemented by an advanced practice nurse to assist health providers with clinical decision making. Descriptive statistics among samples, 30-day readmission rates, and provider utilization and satisfaction were examined.

Results: Readmission rates slightly decreased (N = 109, 9.2% vs. N = 55, 9.1%) in the post-intervention period, but no significant difference. Heterogeneity between the two groups were minimal related to use of specific medications, age, length-of-stay and comorbidities. Descriptively, there was a significant difference the use of diuretics among each group (p = .002).The discharge checklist was used regularly by 67% of (N = 15) providers, and 93% expressed satisfaction with use.

Conclusion: There was no significant reduction in 30-day readmission rates between both groups. However, a slight reduction was noted which indicates the need for further examination into how the use of checklists for clinical decision support can reduce readmissions. A well-designed evidence-based discharge plan remains a critical component of the patient discharge process. Advance practice nurses are uniquely qualified to implement evidence-based interventions that promote practice change among health care providers and improve health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Nurse
Contemporary Nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Nurse is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to increase nursing skills, knowledge and communication, assist in professional development and to enhance educational standards by publishing stimulating, informative and useful articles on a range of issues influencing professional nursing research, teaching and practice. Contemporary Nurse is a forum for nursing educators, researchers and professionals who require high-quality, peer-reviewed research on emerging research fronts, perspectives and protocols, community and family health, cross-cultural research, recruitment, retention, education, training and practitioner perspectives. Contemporary Nurse publishes original research articles, reviews and discussion papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信