喂养方法及其对早产儿输血相关坏死性小肠结肠炎的影响。

Emma Killion
{"title":"喂养方法及其对早产儿输血相关坏死性小肠结肠炎的影响。","authors":"Emma Killion","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000000872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions have been implicated in the development of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants. Some evidence exists to support that withholding feedings during transfusion reduces the risk of subsequent NEC development.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review the most recent literature on this topic to determine best evidence-based practice regarding withholding or not withholding feedings during RBC transfusions.</p><p><strong>Methods/search strategy: </strong>Four databases were searched using keywords and MeSH terms including \"necrotizing enterocolitis,\" \"NEC,\" \"NPO,\" and \"transfusion,\" with specifications limiting the search to articles published in the last 10 years and limiting the population to neonates.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Four studies did not demonstrate a reduction in transfusion-associated necrotizing enterocolitis (TANEC) with the implementation of feeding protocols during packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions. One study concluded that it could not confirm the benefit of withholding feeds during transfusion to reduce the risk of TANEC. A 2020 randomized controlled trial (RCT) found no difference in splanchnic oxygenation when enteral feeds are withheld, continued, or restricted during a PRBC transfusion. Holding feedings during PRBC transfusions did not result in adverse nutritional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>To determine best evidence-based practice surrounding feeding protocols during RBC transfusions in very low-birth-weight and premature infants less than 37 weeks' gestation.</p><p><strong>Implications for research: </strong>It is recommended that large, multicentered, adequately powered RCTs be conducted in this area. Individual institutions should standardize their practice to improve quality, safety, and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520547,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"356-364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feeding Practices and Effects on Transfusion-Associated Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Premature Neonates.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Killion\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANC.0000000000000872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions have been implicated in the development of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants. Some evidence exists to support that withholding feedings during transfusion reduces the risk of subsequent NEC development.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review the most recent literature on this topic to determine best evidence-based practice regarding withholding or not withholding feedings during RBC transfusions.</p><p><strong>Methods/search strategy: </strong>Four databases were searched using keywords and MeSH terms including \\\"necrotizing enterocolitis,\\\" \\\"NEC,\\\" \\\"NPO,\\\" and \\\"transfusion,\\\" with specifications limiting the search to articles published in the last 10 years and limiting the population to neonates.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Four studies did not demonstrate a reduction in transfusion-associated necrotizing enterocolitis (TANEC) with the implementation of feeding protocols during packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions. One study concluded that it could not confirm the benefit of withholding feeds during transfusion to reduce the risk of TANEC. A 2020 randomized controlled trial (RCT) found no difference in splanchnic oxygenation when enteral feeds are withheld, continued, or restricted during a PRBC transfusion. Holding feedings during PRBC transfusions did not result in adverse nutritional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>To determine best evidence-based practice surrounding feeding protocols during RBC transfusions in very low-birth-weight and premature infants less than 37 weeks' gestation.</p><p><strong>Implications for research: </strong>It is recommended that large, multicentered, adequately powered RCTs be conducted in this area. Individual institutions should standardize their practice to improve quality, safety, and patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"356-364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:红细胞(RBC)输注与早产儿坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)的发展有关。一些证据支持输血期间不喂奶可降低随后NEC发展的风险。目的:回顾关于这一主题的最新文献,以确定在红细胞输注期间扣留或不扣留喂养的最佳循证实践。方法/检索策略:使用关键词和MeSH检索四个数据库,包括“坏死性小肠结肠炎”、“NEC”、“NPO”和“输血”,规范将检索限制在最近10年发表的文章,并将人群限制在新生儿。研究结果:四项研究没有证明在填充红细胞(PRBC)输注过程中实施喂养方案可以减少输注相关的坏死性小肠结肠炎(TANEC)。一项研究得出的结论是,它不能证实在输血期间停止喂养以降低TANEC风险的好处。2020年的一项随机对照试验(RCT)发现,在PRBC输血期间,暂停、继续或限制肠内喂养对内脏氧合没有影响。在PRBC输注期间保持喂养不会导致不良的营养结果。实践意义:确定在极低出生体重和小于37周妊娠早产儿输血期间喂养方案的最佳循证实践。对研究的启示:建议在这一领域开展大型、多中心、充分有力的随机对照试验。个别机构应使其实践标准化,以提高质量、安全性和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feeding Practices and Effects on Transfusion-Associated Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Premature Neonates.

Background: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions have been implicated in the development of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants. Some evidence exists to support that withholding feedings during transfusion reduces the risk of subsequent NEC development.

Purpose: To review the most recent literature on this topic to determine best evidence-based practice regarding withholding or not withholding feedings during RBC transfusions.

Methods/search strategy: Four databases were searched using keywords and MeSH terms including "necrotizing enterocolitis," "NEC," "NPO," and "transfusion," with specifications limiting the search to articles published in the last 10 years and limiting the population to neonates.

Findings: Four studies did not demonstrate a reduction in transfusion-associated necrotizing enterocolitis (TANEC) with the implementation of feeding protocols during packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions. One study concluded that it could not confirm the benefit of withholding feeds during transfusion to reduce the risk of TANEC. A 2020 randomized controlled trial (RCT) found no difference in splanchnic oxygenation when enteral feeds are withheld, continued, or restricted during a PRBC transfusion. Holding feedings during PRBC transfusions did not result in adverse nutritional outcomes.

Implications for practice: To determine best evidence-based practice surrounding feeding protocols during RBC transfusions in very low-birth-weight and premature infants less than 37 weeks' gestation.

Implications for research: It is recommended that large, multicentered, adequately powered RCTs be conducted in this area. Individual institutions should standardize their practice to improve quality, safety, and patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信