Kristen Lagasse Burke , Lauren Thaxton , Joseph E. Potter
{"title":"短效激素避孕药在德克萨斯州低收入产后妇女中的延续","authors":"Kristen Lagasse Burke , Lauren Thaxton , Joseph E. Potter","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective was to assess continuation of the pill, patch, ring or injectable (i.e., short-acting hormonal contraception); characteristics associated with discontinuation; and subsequent method use among low-income postpartum women in Texas.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Using a 24-month cohort study of 1700 women who delivered in eight Texas hospitals and were uninsured or publicly insured at the time of delivery, we focused on 456 women who used short-acting hormonal contraception within 6 months after delivery. We classified this sample according to characteristics and method preference, and estimated rates of discontinuation and associated predictors using life tables and Cox models. We assessed reasons for discontinuation and subsequent contraceptive use among those who discontinued.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Roughly half used the pill and half used the injectable. One hundred seventy-eight (39%) expressed a baseline preference for the method they used, 162 (36%) preferred a long-acting reversible contraception method, and 41 (9%) preferred sterilization. After 1 year, 72% had discontinued [95% confidence interval (CI) 67.1–75.7]. Foreign-born Hispanic women were less likely to discontinue than U.S.-born Hispanics [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.65; 95% CI 0.50–0.84]. Those who wanted a more effective method (aHR, 1.44; 95% CI 1.12–1.85) and those who lost insurance coverage (aHR, 1.47; 95% CI 1.12–1.92) were more likely to discontinue. The most common reasons for discontinuation were side effects and access/cost. Of those who discontinued, 243 (68%) switched to a less effective or no method. Only 47 (13%) switched to their preferred method.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Short-acting hormonal contraceptive discontinuation is high in this population. Many switch to less effective methods after discontinuation despite preferring methods at least as effective as the pill, patch, ring or injectable.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Expanding contraceptive coverage in the 2 years after delivery should be a state and federal policy priority. In clinics, providers should discuss contraceptive preferences throughout pregnancy and the interpregnancy interval.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100052","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-acting hormonal contraceptive continuation among low-income postpartum women in Texas\",\"authors\":\"Kristen Lagasse Burke , Lauren Thaxton , Joseph E. Potter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective was to assess continuation of the pill, patch, ring or injectable (i.e., short-acting hormonal contraception); characteristics associated with discontinuation; and subsequent method use among low-income postpartum women in Texas.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Using a 24-month cohort study of 1700 women who delivered in eight Texas hospitals and were uninsured or publicly insured at the time of delivery, we focused on 456 women who used short-acting hormonal contraception within 6 months after delivery. We classified this sample according to characteristics and method preference, and estimated rates of discontinuation and associated predictors using life tables and Cox models. We assessed reasons for discontinuation and subsequent contraceptive use among those who discontinued.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Roughly half used the pill and half used the injectable. One hundred seventy-eight (39%) expressed a baseline preference for the method they used, 162 (36%) preferred a long-acting reversible contraception method, and 41 (9%) preferred sterilization. After 1 year, 72% had discontinued [95% confidence interval (CI) 67.1–75.7]. Foreign-born Hispanic women were less likely to discontinue than U.S.-born Hispanics [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.65; 95% CI 0.50–0.84]. Those who wanted a more effective method (aHR, 1.44; 95% CI 1.12–1.85) and those who lost insurance coverage (aHR, 1.47; 95% CI 1.12–1.92) were more likely to discontinue. The most common reasons for discontinuation were side effects and access/cost. Of those who discontinued, 243 (68%) switched to a less effective or no method. Only 47 (13%) switched to their preferred method.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Short-acting hormonal contraceptive discontinuation is high in this population. Many switch to less effective methods after discontinuation despite preferring methods at least as effective as the pill, patch, ring or injectable.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Expanding contraceptive coverage in the 2 years after delivery should be a state and federal policy priority. In clinics, providers should discuss contraceptive preferences throughout pregnancy and the interpregnancy interval.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100052\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
目的评估避孕药、贴片、避孕环或注射剂(即短效激素避孕药)的持续使用情况;与停药有关的特征;以及后续方法在德克萨斯州低收入产后妇女中的应用。研究设计:对1700名在德克萨斯州8家医院分娩的妇女进行了为期24个月的队列研究,这些妇女在分娩时没有保险或公共保险,我们重点研究了456名在分娩后6个月内使用短效激素避孕的妇女。我们根据特征和方法偏好对样本进行分类,并使用生命表和Cox模型估计停药率和相关预测因子。我们评估了停药的原因和停药后的避孕药使用情况。结果大约一半的人服用避孕药,一半的人服用注射剂。178人(39%)对他们使用的方法表示基线偏好,162人(36%)倾向于长效可逆避孕方法,41人(9%)倾向于绝育。1年后,72%的患者停药[95%可信区间(CI) 67.1-75.7]。在国外出生的西班牙裔妇女比在美国出生的西班牙裔妇女更不可能停止服用[调整风险比(aHR), 0.65;95% ci 0.50-0.84]。那些想要更有效方法的人(aHR, 1.44;95% CI 1.12-1.85)和失去保险覆盖的患者(aHR, 1.47;95% CI 1.12-1.92)更有可能停止治疗。停药最常见的原因是副作用和可及性/费用。在停止治疗的患者中,243例(68%)改用效果较差的方法或没有方法。只有47人(13%)改用他们喜欢的方法。结论该人群短效激素避孕药停药率较高。许多人在停药后转而使用效果较差的方法,尽管他们更喜欢至少与避孕药、贴片、避孕环或注射剂一样有效的方法。在分娩后2年内扩大避孕覆盖范围应成为州和联邦政策的优先事项。在诊所,提供者应该讨论整个怀孕期间的避孕偏好和妊娠间隔。
Short-acting hormonal contraceptive continuation among low-income postpartum women in Texas
Objective
The objective was to assess continuation of the pill, patch, ring or injectable (i.e., short-acting hormonal contraception); characteristics associated with discontinuation; and subsequent method use among low-income postpartum women in Texas.
Study design
Using a 24-month cohort study of 1700 women who delivered in eight Texas hospitals and were uninsured or publicly insured at the time of delivery, we focused on 456 women who used short-acting hormonal contraception within 6 months after delivery. We classified this sample according to characteristics and method preference, and estimated rates of discontinuation and associated predictors using life tables and Cox models. We assessed reasons for discontinuation and subsequent contraceptive use among those who discontinued.
Results
Roughly half used the pill and half used the injectable. One hundred seventy-eight (39%) expressed a baseline preference for the method they used, 162 (36%) preferred a long-acting reversible contraception method, and 41 (9%) preferred sterilization. After 1 year, 72% had discontinued [95% confidence interval (CI) 67.1–75.7]. Foreign-born Hispanic women were less likely to discontinue than U.S.-born Hispanics [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.65; 95% CI 0.50–0.84]. Those who wanted a more effective method (aHR, 1.44; 95% CI 1.12–1.85) and those who lost insurance coverage (aHR, 1.47; 95% CI 1.12–1.92) were more likely to discontinue. The most common reasons for discontinuation were side effects and access/cost. Of those who discontinued, 243 (68%) switched to a less effective or no method. Only 47 (13%) switched to their preferred method.
Conclusions
Short-acting hormonal contraceptive discontinuation is high in this population. Many switch to less effective methods after discontinuation despite preferring methods at least as effective as the pill, patch, ring or injectable.
Implications
Expanding contraceptive coverage in the 2 years after delivery should be a state and federal policy priority. In clinics, providers should discuss contraceptive preferences throughout pregnancy and the interpregnancy interval.